Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for META-KING Results

Channel

META-KING Results

@metakingresults

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

409subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003125054995
TypeChannel
Username@metakingresults
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 25 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/metakingresults

Growth

406409407.57 August 2026 — 406 subscribers7 August 2026 — 406 subscribers15 August 2026 — 408 subscribers23 August 2026 — 409 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 406–409 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 14:43409+1
15 Aug 2026, 00:54408+2
7 Aug 2026, 11:20406no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:47406first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 25 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

13 May 2026, 23:42 UTC448 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#9 — PRIVATE PEPTIDE BRAND 🔥 $570K+ Revenue in 13 Days | 🇨🇦 Canada Peptides Market ➡️13 days. ➡️$16K ad spend. ➡️$570K+ tracked purchase value. ➡️2,098+ purchases. This is one of the strongest e-commerce results we’ve documented under META-KING Results so far. We’re proud to present a private peptide e-commerce campaign in the Canadian market, built, optimized, and scaled by the META-KING. Project Overview A pr

7 Apr 2026, 15:47 UTC397 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 PEPTIDES ADS — RESULTS ARE LIVE 🚨 We’re currently scaling PEPTIDES offers on Meta Ads and the numbers speak for themselves 👇 📈 50+ ROAS 🇨🇦 📈 40+ ROAS 🇺🇸 Real campaigns. Real data. Real profits💵 This niche is printing right now… And we already built the system to scale it. ⚙️ What we handle for you: ➡️ Full Meta Ads management ➡️ High-converting creatives ➡️ Pixel + CAPI + tracking setup ➡️ Daily optimization

13 Jan 2026, 02:17 UTC492 viewsread 7 August 2026

Want your ads to run & perform like the results in this channel? We take your offer LIVE on Meta within 24 hours 🔥 We Handle ALL Restricted Offers⬇️ ⚡️ Casino & Gambling 🔥 CBD & Nutra 🔞 Adult 💸 Crypto / Forex ⚠️ High-Risk & Restricted Niches ✔️ Verified Ad Accounts ✔️ Unlimited Spending ✔️ Full Tracking Setup ✔️ Managed by Senior Meta Experts ✉️ Book your spot now: @clo1king 🚨 Limited availability this month

25 Nov 2025, 16:37 UTC769 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#8 — DIRA CAPITAL 🔥 AI-Powered Investment Funnel | 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia Market We’re proud to present another strong performance under META-KING Results, showcasing one of our latest AI-driven investment funnels. Fully built, optimized, and scaled by the META-KING team for the Saudi market. Project Overview A client from the Investment & Financial Advisory vertical approached us to generate high-quality Saudi leads fo

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @metakingresults. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 501,535 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“META-KING Results” (@metakingresults), 409 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/metakingresults.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.