Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 32 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,189–1,244 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 16:38
1,238
+22
6 Sept 2026, 20:36
1,216
+5
2 Sept 2026, 10:06
1,211
+1
30 Aug 2026, 03:37
1,210
+4
27 Aug 2026, 08:33
1,206
+8
24 Aug 2026, 18:17
1,198
+3
20 Aug 2026, 20:14
1,195
-3
18 Aug 2026, 04:11
1,198
-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:44
1,199
-2
11 Aug 2026, 01:46
1,201
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 37m
Average length
48m 54s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
369 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
244
66.1%
🔥
71
19.2%
❤🔥
24
6.50%
👍
11
2.98%
🙏
9
2.44%
💯
5
1.36%
🕊
3
0.813%
😁
1
0.271%
🥰
1
0.271%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Лена❤️
Я посмотрела два первых эфира марафона в записи, третий ещё остался, но уже сейчас хочу сказать - ну как же офигенно ты постоянно развиваешься как профессионал!
Я столько твоих марафонов и сессий уже проходила и каждый раз замечаю, как ты растёшь. Но в этот раз прям особенно: ощущение, что у тебя с каждым разом всё больше скорость, уверенность и вообще другой уровень.
Очень понравился эфир! Всё так чётко, во…
ПЕРЕХОД В НОВУЮ МАТРИЦУ
Запись прямого эфира
- Новая матрица
- Баги и эффект Манделы
- Признаки что вы в переходе
- Убираем энергетические блоки и воздействия.
- Как принимать и интегрировать загрузки
- Карма родовая. Род.
- ответы на вопросы
Тебе только что поменяли систему. И ты это уже чувствуешь. 👇
Если последние недели всё как будто «зависает» — привычные способы не работают, силы уходят непонятно куда, а внутри ощущение «что-то изменилось, но не пойму что» — это не совпадение.
Регистрация
Ну что, лидер в голосовании у нас откладывание. И это очень понятно. Типа: «ничего не будет если сделаю это позже»
НО
Мы все переходим а новую матрицу. Массово. На марафоне Врата Льва будем работать с этим в третий день.
А в новой матрице откладывать - это значит начинать каждый раз заново.
То есть так уже не получиться взять недоделанное и доделать. Все по-новому. Как точно все будет работать расскажем на марафон…
Я вот лечу в самолете и вот что думаю про ветки вероятности.
Когда открывается память души они начинают скакать как бешеные собаки.
И это теперь новая реальность.
Рецепт как с ними управляться дам на марафоне в третий день. Урок усвоен.
Если бы вы знали заранее, что тот навык, который мы отрабатывали в группе «Июль. Трекер интеграции» будет основным навыком новой матрицы, вы бы зашли и делали бы задания?
Да, 100%65%
Все равно мне лень11%
Опять я все мимо пропустила 👻27%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Мне показывают глаза и уши, как будто тебе нужно что-то увидеть и услышать благодаря этом у опозданию
❤14🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @meta_consultant_ElenaZotova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Если бы вы знали заранее, что тот навык, который мы отрабатывали в группе «Июль. Трекер интеграции» будет основным навыком новой матрицы, вы бы зашли и делали бы задания?
Да, 100%65%
Все равно мне лень11%
Опять я все мимо пропустила 👻27%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Евгений Теребенин - Терапия Души @eterebenin · 33,882 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Елена Зотова | META-LIFE” (@meta_consultant_ElenaZotova), 1,238 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meta_consultant_ElenaZotova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.