@xavier

Channel
Meta Usernames | @KingZevin
@meta_ai_usernames
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003202904129 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @meta_ai_usernames |
| Description | Generic Meta.ai Usernames | Meta Glasses use Meta AI accounts meta.ai/ |
| Created | 9 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/meta_ai_usernames |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:29 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 9 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2025 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Meta AI Glasses | Meta.ai Usernames 1 @shooter 2 @sunday 3 @six 4 @o00 5 @death 6 @stfu 7 @iii 8 @war 9 @gun 10 @bae 11 @gay 12 @nig 13 @circle 14 @omg 15 @september 16 @russia 17 @february 18 @clit 19 @bed 20 @cock 21 @fry 22 @kkk 23 @meme 24 @t_t 25 @artificialintelligence 26 @yoo 27 @sexual 28 @leg 29 @like 30 @ate 31 @fat 32 @sushi 33 @had 34 @how 35 @pit 36 @rot 37 @zombie 3…
a
Selling the new Instagram Username exploit DM for the bot info Can claim most of the username $250 @xavieranto
Meta AI Glasses | Meta.ai Usernames 1 @shooter 2 @sunday 3 @six 4 @o00 5 @death 6 @stfu 7 @iii 8 @war 9 @gun 10 @bae 11 @gay 12 @nig 13 @circle 14 @omg 15 @september 16 @russia 17 @february 18 @clit 19 @bed 20 @cock 21 @fry 22 @kkk 23 @meme 24 @t_t 25 @artificialintelligence 26 @yoo 27 @sexual 28 @leg 29 @like 30 @ate 31 @fat 32 @sushi 33 @had 34 @how 35 @pit 36 @rot 37 @zombie 3…
🤡1🤣1
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @meta_ai_usernames. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@meta_ai_usernames named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026 · confirmed gone 20 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Meta Usernames | @KingZevin” (@meta_ai_usernames), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meta_ai_usernames.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.