Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ©Переходник©

Channel

©Переходник©

@mesqueunclubua

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10subscribers

-4,218 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001882128530
TypeChannel
Usernames@mesqueunclubua @viscabarcaua
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mesqueunclubua

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

104,2562,1337 August 2026 — 4,228 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,228 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,232 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,236 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,242 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,250 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,252 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,256 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,250 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,249 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,250 subscribers6 September 2026 — 4,249 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,241 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,243 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 42 days, net -4,218. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 01:4210-4,233
15 Sept 2026, 16:564,243+2
14 Sept 2026, 08:224,241+4,229
11 Sept 2026, 08:5812-4,237
6 Sept 2026, 05:384,249-1
2 Sept 2026, 08:574,250+1
30 Aug 2026, 06:164,249-1
27 Aug 2026, 16:374,250-6
24 Aug 2026, 15:074,256+4
20 Aug 2026, 13:234,252+2
17 Aug 2026, 12:364,250+8
14 Aug 2026, 03:274,242+6
11 Aug 2026, 06:424,236+4
8 Aug 2026, 01:274,232+4
7 Aug 2026, 15:014,228no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:484,228first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11358.8%
avg views ÷ 10 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,140
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026
Posts held55 (6 August 202614 September 2026)
Views total19,310
Reactions total798
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 56s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,818 reactions across 54 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
88323.1%
😁60115.7%
❤‍🔥49312.9%
custom 53709369796659878932927.65%
🤣2887.54%
👍2446.39%
🤯1714.48%
🔥1483.88%
🤩1223.20%
1012.65%
🕊761.99%
custom 5960531441312861970601.57%
🥰541.41%
🤝431.13%
custom 5188612461149856752370.969%
😢340.891%
custom 5221973061275760205320.838%
🙏280.733%
🫡270.707%
custom 5308028116940110860220.576%
13 further kinds621.62%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,818 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Sept 2026, 08:01 UTC411 viewsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🇩🇪 Карім Адеємі — Ян Діоманде 🇨🇮 24 роки — 37 років €22 млн — €140 млн 3 голи — 0 голів 1 асист — 0 асистів 🏆 ФК БАРСЕЛОНА УКРАЇНА

14 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC701 views23 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🇪🇦 «Барселона» була готова продати лівого захисника Алехандро Бальде влітку лише за €40 млн. Клуб не розглядав варіант із орендою, а «Манчестер Юнайтед» не був упевнений, що Бальде є найкращим довгостроковим варіантом. – Фабріціо Романо 🏆 ФК БАРСЕЛОНА УКРАЇНА

20❤‍🔥3

14 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC744 views64 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🇩🇰 Цікавий факт: Відтоді як Флік очолив «Барселону», Андреас Крістенсен уперше зіграв 5 матчів поспіль за каталонський клуб без травм. 🏆 ФК БАРСЕЛОНА УКРАЇНА

51🙏8❤‍🔥3👍2

14 Sept 2026, 06:15 UTC836 views33 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🇪🇦 Після фінального свистка у матчі «Барселони» з «Леванте» вболівальник переліз через огорожу та побіг у бік Пау Кубарсі. Фанат ледь не збив Кубарсі з ніг, після чого втрутилися троє співробітників служби безпеки. Неясно, що саме вболівальник мав намір зробити. – The Touchline 🏆 ФК БАРСЕЛОНА УКРАЇНА

👍25🔥61❤‍🔥1

14 Sept 2026, 05:31 UTC931 views34 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Video

🇩🇪 Флік після матчу: «Ми раді цій перемозі» — Я думаю, що пропущені голи стали наслідком наших помилок. Але в ситуації з першим голом, можливо, помилився саме я. Ми хотіли замінити Шаві, оскільки в нього були судоми, але я попросив почекати. Можливо, якби ми замінили його в той момент, то не пропустили б. Але зрештою команда повернулася в гру й забила четвертий гол. Тепер ми виграли всі свої матчі, і це хороша ситу

❤‍🔥303👍1

14 Sept 2026, 05:00 UTC957 views22 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Сьогоднішні обкладинки газет наших постійних інсайдерів: 🗞 «Ідеальні 15 із 15» 🗞 «Ідеальні 15» 👑👑👑Забирай бездепозитний 👑👑👑бонус в 1000₴ на BETKING 👑👑👑за промокодом BARCA!

18👍3❤‍🔥1

14 Sept 2026, 04:00 UTC≈1,100 views103 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Video

🇪🇸 Ламін Ямал: — Кіліан Мбаппе і я — два найкращі гравці у світі. Але цього року я вважаю, що заслуговую на перемогу в номінації «Золотий м'яч». Я вважаю, що заслуговую на цей «Золотий м'яч» також завдяки титулам, які я виграв і здобув у минулому сезоні. Це моя думка. 🏆 ФК БАРСЕЛОНА УКРАЇНА

custom 537093697966598789366custom 5188612461149856752288❤‍🔥1

13 Sept 2026, 16:44 UTC≈1,390 views37 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🫵 Оцінки за матч від Sofascore. 🏆 ФК БАРСЕЛОНА УКРАЇНА

👍27custom 51886124611498567529❤‍🔥1

13 Sept 2026, 16:26 UTC≈1,410 views30 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🧢 З сьогоднішнього матчу проти «Леванте» я зрозумів, що: Поділіться в коментарях ⤵️ 🏆 ФК БАРСЕЛОНА УКРАЇНА

❤‍🔥282

13 Sept 2026, 16:24 UTC≈1,390 views78 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🇪🇸 Офіційно: Ламін MVP гри. 🏆 ФК БАРСЕЛОНА УКРАЇНА

❤‍🔥705😐3

13 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC≈1,360 views85 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🇪🇸🇪🇸 Леванте 2-4 Барселона ⚽️ 5’: Хаві Еспарт. (0:1) ⚽️ 19’: Ламін Ямал. (0:2) ⚽️ 48’: Ламін Ямал (пен.). (0:3) ⚽️ 79’: Іван Ромеро. (1:3) ⚽️ 88’: Брюгге. (2:3) ⚽️ 90+2’: Адеємі. (2:4) • xG: 1.86–1.97 • Володіння: 26–74% • Передачі: 141–546 • Фоли: 10–11 Леванте пощастило відбутися легко. А нам це також стало хорошим нагадуванням про те, що будь-яке розслаблення чи індивідуальна помилка одразу призводять до покара

74❤‍🔥10custom 53709369796659878931

13 Sept 2026, 16:16 UTC≈1,310 views75 reactionsread 14 September 2026

93ʼ ГООООООООЛ АДЕЄМІ! 4-2 🇩🇪 Берналь асист.

🔥64❤‍🔥4custom 530802811694011086043

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @mesqueunclubua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@mesqueunclubua edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

LATERAL | Футбол України ⚽️
@lateral_footbalI · 64,533
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
ФУТБОЛ УКРАЇНИ
@theukrfoot · 48,824
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Barca Family News
@BarcaFamilyNews · 35,263
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
Футбол 2.0
@football20ua · 27,963
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
Брутальний Футбол ⚽️
@bfootballua · 37,469
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Українська Асоціація Футболу
@uafukraine · 35,256
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Usyk. The Cat. Oleksandr
@Usyk17 · 25,321
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
Barca Family
@barcafamilyyy · 74,956
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
ФК Карпати Львів
@fc_karpaty_lviv · 25,664
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
Барселона - Mes Que Un Club ️
@barcafanru · 38,363
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“©Переходник©” (@mesqueunclubua), 10 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mesqueunclubua.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.