Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,867–4,932 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 14:20
4,874
-8
15 Sept 2026, 12:59
4,882
-9
11 Sept 2026, 16:39
4,891
-10
7 Sept 2026, 05:00
4,901
+10
2 Sept 2026, 16:14
4,891
-3
30 Aug 2026, 05:28
4,894
+5
27 Aug 2026, 12:17
4,889
-9
24 Aug 2026, 13:54
4,898
-26
20 Aug 2026, 21:46
4,924
+14
18 Aug 2026, 07:27
4,910
-4
15 Aug 2026, 00:46
4,914
+18
11 Aug 2026, 12:25
4,896
+8
8 Aug 2026, 12:42
4,888
+1
7 Aug 2026, 19:48
4,887
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
252 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
125
49.6%
🔥
65
25.8%
👍
38
15.1%
😍
14
5.56%
❤🔥
5
1.98%
⚡
3
1.19%
🏆
2
0.794%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я в шоке от новой версии Seedance 2.5 👀❤️🔥
Это видео создано из 1 изображения по 1 промпту 🔥
Просто шикарно! Идеальная детализация, перенос внешности и товара (костюм для йоги)
Нужен промпт для создания такого видео? 👇🏻 Ставьте реакции, так я пойму, что вам интересно 😍😍😍
Пока не прошли даже сутки после публикации этого поста…
Он уже набрал почти 20 000 просмотров, а в директ начали приходить запросы на сотрудничество👇
❗️Мне постоянно задают один и тот же вопрос:
«Где искать клиентов?»
Но мой опыт показывает, что самые сильные проекты приходят не после холодных сообщений брендам, а тогда, когда ваш контент сам отвечает на вопрос:
«Почему именно вы?»
🎬Этот пост не продавал мои услу…
Как заработать первые
100 000₽ на AI-визуале?🙌🏻
Большинство из вас думает, что бренды ищут человека, который умеет пользоваться нейросетями.
На самом деле — нет! ⤵
Брендам не нужны красивые промпты, сотни случайных генераций и точно не нужны пластиковые лица, шесть пальцев и картинки, которые сразу выдают ИИ.
→ За это никто не платит.. 👌🏻
→ За что тогда готовы платить❓
За умение создавать визуал, который выгляд…
‼️На ИИ невозможно заработать‼️
Наверное, это самая частая фраза, которую я вижу в последнее время👀
Кто-то говорит, что зарабатывают только те, кто продаёт курсы, кто-то пишет, что клиентов нет. А кто-то уверен, что новичку вообще нереально найти первые заказы😭
И в какой-то момент я решила не верить, а просто проверить это на себе 👇🏻
Три месяца назад я полностью ушла в сферу AI: выложила рилс в инсту, что начинаю…
Неделю гуляли по Москве и Питеру, любовались городами и просто отдыхали 😍
Итог поездки:
150 000 шагов✅
мозоли на ногах✅
красивые фотографии✅
и ощущение полной перезагрузки✅
Теперь снова возвращаюсь в рабочий режим. За время отпуска накопилось столько сообщений и проектов, что разгребать буду ещё несколько дней 😅
Но оно того точно стоило ❤️
❤9🔥2😍2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @merzlikina_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Екатерина Мерзликина | ai-creator📁” (@merzlikina_ai), 4,874 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/merzlikina_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.