Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MERN + MEAN Stack Developer

Channel

MERN + MEAN Stack Developer

@mern_mean

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,974subscribers

-72 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001371891219
TypeChannel
Username@mern_mean
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mern_mean

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,9746,0466,01015 August 2026 — 6,046 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,041 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,035 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,025 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,022 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,014 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,005 subscribers5 September 2026 — 5,995 subscribers10 September 2026 — 5,986 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,978 subscribers19 September 2026 — 5,974 subscribers15 August 202619 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 35 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,963–6,057 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 00:215,974-4
14 Sept 2026, 08:155,978-8
10 Sept 2026, 16:385,986-9
5 Sept 2026, 03:175,995-10
1 Sept 2026, 07:136,005-9
29 Aug 2026, 16:036,014-8
26 Aug 2026, 10:526,022-3
23 Aug 2026, 06:566,025-10
19 Aug 2026, 16:376,035-6
16 Aug 2026, 07:196,041-5
15 Aug 2026, 04:456,046first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁5044.2%
3026.5%
👍2824.8%
🔥21.77%
😱21.77%
🤔10.885%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2024 to 16 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2025, 03:13 UTC≈8,090 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Read “Self-Hosting AI Models“ by Harendra on Medium: https://medium.com/@harendra21/self-hosting-ai-models-3d5e7236302a

8

12 Jul 2025, 15:16 UTC≈7,710 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Read “How to Build a Free Personal Cloud Using Open-Source Tools“ by Harendra on Medium: https://medium.com/@harendra21/how-to-build-a-free-personal-cloud-using-open-source-tools-20a449c44481

1

12 Jun 2025, 17:10 UTC≈8,210 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Open source tools for Automation, CMS, File, Reverse Proxy, Docker, and Data management https://medium.com/@harendra21/open-source-tools-i-cant-work-without-7f3a226d6a21?sk=9678e49fa7cab09796b13a7b4d470e16

3🔥2

26 May 2025, 17:40 UTC≈8,110 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Google I/O 2025 updates - AI Mode Search, Project Astra, VEO 3 Model, Google XR Glasses, and Gemini Ultra https://withcodeexample.com/google-i-o-2025-a-new-era-of-ai-driven-experiences/

👍21

23 Apr 2025, 12:11 UTC≈8,160 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

AI Code Writing, Review, and Optimization Tools Discover how AI is revolutionizing code writing with review and optimization tools, improving efficiency and accuracy in software development processes instantly

👍1

19 Apr 2025, 09:15 UTC≈7,590 views19 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁162👍1

10 Apr 2025, 05:17 UTC≈7,330 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Get The Complete Full-Stack Web Development Bootcamp by Dr. Angela Yu 👉 https://bit.ly/4lqVSHi

3👍1

11 Mar 2025, 18:13 UTC≈7,920 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁11🤔1

22 Feb 2025, 21:00 UTC≈7,210 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

MacBook Air M2 (8GB, 512GB) @₹79,990 https://t.me/PriceSlashX/1323 + Extra EMI Discount with Federal/HDFC CC

2👍1

20 Feb 2025, 07:40 UTC≈6,400 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Secure your web application with SafeLine (Semantic Analysis-based WAF rules) https://medium.com/@harendra21/safeline-open-source-web-application-firewall-waf-766ea4d1a5a1

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mern_mean. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

JavaScript
@javascript · 31,168
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
Computer Quiz 💫
@Computer_Awareness_GK · 65,619
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 August 2026
Code Wars
@code_wars_official · 43,827
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
Fresher Jobs Adda
@Fresherjobsadda · 104,813
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MERN + MEAN Stack Developer” (@mern_mean), 5,974 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mern_mean.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.