Channel
@mere_protestantism
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,138subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002257383464 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mere_protestantism |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mere_protestantism |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 2,138 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 2,136 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 2,138 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 2,138 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (24 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,875 |
| Reactions total | 289 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
289 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 241 | 83.4% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 6.23% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 6.23% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 2.77% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.692% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.692% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
በመንግሥተ ሰማይ እግዚአብሔር አብ፣ እግዚአብሔር ወልድ እና እግዚአብሔር መንፈስ ቅዱስ፤ በወሰን የለሽ፣ ሊደረስበት በማይቻል እና ለዘላለም በሚኖር ፍቅር በአንድነት ይኖራሉ። 👉 በዚያ እግዚአብሔር አብ፣ የምሕረት አባት በዚህም የፍቅር አባት የሆነው እርሱ፣ ዓለምን እጅግ ከመውደዱ የተነሳ አንድያ ልጁን አሳልፎ እስከ መስጠት ድረስ የወደደው አባት እግዚአብሔር ይኖራል። 👉 በዚያ የእግዚአብሔር በግ፣ የሰላምና የፍቅር መስፍን የሆነው፣ ዓለምን እጅግ ከመውደዱ የተነሳ ደሙን ያፈሰሰውና ነፍሱን ለሰዎች እስከ ሞት አሳልፎ የሰጠው ክርስቶስ ይኖራል። በዚያ መለኮታዊ ፍቅር ሁሉ ወደ ሰዎች የተገለጠበት፣ ታላቁ መካከለኛ ይኖራል። በዚያ ክርስቶስ በሁለቱ ባህሪያቱ፣ በሰው…
❤13
ከሁለት አደገኛ ጽንፎች ራሳችንን እንጠብቅ! 👉 በአንድ በኩል—ራሳቸውን በክርስቶስ ቦታ ተክተው "በአምላክና በሕዝቡ መካከል መካከለኛ ነን" በሚል ለአምልኮ የቀረቡ መሪዎች (Cult of personality)፤ 👉 በአንጻሩ ደግሞ—"ከክርስቶስ ውጭ ማንም አያስፈልገኝም" በሚል ሽፋን ከቤተ ክርስቲያንና ከመንፈሳዊ አመራር ራሳቸውን የሚያገሉ መንፈሳዊ ግለኞች (Individualism)። 💥 እውነታው ግን ይህ ነው፦ * መንፈሳዊ መካከለኛ አያስፈልገንም፦ ወደ አብ ለመድረስ ብቸኛው መካከለኛቻችን ኢየሱስ ክርስቶስ ብቻ ነው። * መንፈሳዊ መሪ ግን ያስፈልገናል፦ ክርስቶስ ለአካሉ እድገትና ጥበቃ መሪዎችን (እረኞችን) ሰጥቷል። 📌 ስለዚህ፤ ከግለኝነትም (indi…
❤32🙏8
ሕይወት ያለ ኢየሱስ ማለት መብራት በሌለበት ከሶኬት ጋር መታገል ማለት ነው። 👇👇👇👇 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4yufopY/
❤13
ትላንት ይህን ቪድዮ ቲክቶክ አጥፍቶት ነበር። እና Appeal አድርጌ ዛሬ ተመልሷል። የሚገርመው ብዙ ሰዎች በቪድዮው የቀረበው ሐሳብ የእነርሱን ሕይወት እንደሚወክል በውስጥ መስክረውልኛል። አንዳንዶቹ ደግሞ በማኅበራዊ ሕይወታቸው በቪድዮው በተዘረዘሩት መንገዶች መኖራቸው የፖርኖግራፊ ሱስ ውጤት እንደሆነ ገና አሁን መረዳታቸውን ገልጸዋል። እንግዲህ እንዲህ ጠቃሚ ከሆነ ተመልሶ እንዳይጠፋና ለብዙዎች እንዲደርስ ቪድዮውን አጋሩት። እና ኮፒ ሊንክ ይደረግ። https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4UVJYgU/
❤13👍1
ሰሞኑን ማኅበራዊ ሚድያ ላይ ሲመላለስ ለተመለከትነው በ100K እርቃኔን ለማሳየት ዝግጁ ነኝ ለሚለው ቪድዮ የተሰጠ ምላሽ በቲክቶክ አስቀምጫለሁ። ምላሹ ልጅቷ ላይ ያነጣጠረ ሳይሆን ከእርሷ ንግግር በመነሣት በዘመናችን ለወሲባዊ ቀውስ ምክንያት የሆኑ ሦስት ፍልስፍናዊ ውድቀቶች ላይ ትኩረት ያደረገ ነው። በዚህ መልኩ ቪድዮ ሥሠራ የመጀመሪያዬ ነው😁 ተመልከቱት፦ https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4AvJEUu/
❤19
1ኛ ጴጥሮስ ተከታታይ ትምህርት ክፍል 4፦ መንፈሳዊ ብስለት (1፥22-2፥25) 👉 የመንፈሳዊ ብስለት ምንነት 👉 የመንፈሳዊ ብስለት አስፈላጊነት 👉 የመንፈሳዊ ብስለት አቅጣጫዎች
❤10
ይህ የትምህርቱ ማስታወሻ ነው።
❤9
ወደ ፊት እኖራለሁ፤ ወደ ኋላ እረዳለሁ!! የፖርኖሲስ ትውልድ መጽሐፍን ስጽፍ በጥቁር አንበሳ ሆስፒታል የምማረውን የሕክምና ትምህርት አቋርጬ ለረጅም ወራት በአዲስ አበባ በኪራይ ቤት ኖሬያለሁ። አቤት በወቅቱ የነበረው ፈተና!! ብቸኝነት፣ ግራ መጋባት፣ ተስፋ መቁረጥ፣ የቤት ኪራይና ተያያዥ ወጪዎቹ... ምኑ ተቆጥሮ ያልቃል። በወቅቱ የምሻገረው፣ የሚያልፍ ወይም እግዚአብሔር ከእኔ ጋር ያለ ከቶ አይመስልም ነበር! ዛሬ ላይ ቆሜ ወደ ኋላ ስመለከት ግን የእግዚአብሔርን መልካምነት እመለከታለሁ። እግዚአብሔር መልካም ነው የሚለው ቃል አሁን ለእኔ ሕያው የሆነ የሚነዝር ቃል ነው! እርሱ መልካም ነው ስል ያነበብሁትን አይደለም፤ በሕይወቴ ያየሁትን እያወራሁ እንጂ። …
❤27🔥2
አንድ ሰው ፖርኖግራፊ እንደሚመለከት ፍንጭ የሚሰጡ 5 ማኅበራዊ ባሕርያት (አምስቱ መ'ዎች) 👇👇 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4MFDcXD/
❤3🔥2😁2
ዘመናችን የቀውስ ቋት ነው፤ እንደ ትውልድ የሚያተራምሰንም ብዙ ነው፡፡ በመካከላችን መርዛማ ፍሬ የሚያፈራ ክፉ ዛፍ ተተክሏል፡፡ ፖርኖግራፊ ታዲያ የዚህ ዛፍ ጎልቶ የሚታይ ታላቅ ፍሬ እንጂ ሥሩ አይደለም፡፡ የ‘ፖርኖሲስ ትውልድ’ መጽሐፍ ዋና ዓላማ የዛፉን መርዛማ ፍሬ መሬት ላይ ረግፎ እንዲጠፋ መታገል ብቻ አይደለም፤ የክፉውን ዛፍ ሥር ምሶ ከመሠረቱ መንቀል እንጂ! ፖርኖግራፊ በሰፊው የበቀለው በትውልዳችን ውስጥ ከሚታየው የማንነት፣ የምንነት እና የለምንነት ቀውስ ነው፡፡ እርሱ የታላቁ ፍልስፍናዊ ውድቀታችን መገለጫ እንጂ በተነጠለ ደሴት ላይ የቆመ ችግር አይደለም፡፡ የመጽሐፌም ዋና ዒላማ ችግሩን ከነሥር-መሠረቱ ማድረቅ ነው፡፡ የችግሩ መሠረት ታዲያ ምንድን…
❤12
👆ይህ በወንድም አልዓዛር በመጽሐፌ (የፖርኖሲስ ትውልድ) ላይ የተደረገ ድንቅ ግምገማ ነው። ሁላችሁም አንብቡት። በግምገማው ለተነሡት አንዳንድ ጥያቄዎች የሰጠሁትን ምላሽ ደግሞ ከታች አስቀምጣለሁ👇 https://telegra.ph/%E1%89%A0%E1%8B%88%E1%8A%95%E1%8B%B5%E1%88%9D-%E1%8A%A0%E1%88%8D%E1%8B%93%E1%8B%9B%E1%88%AD-%E1%88%88%E1%89%80%E1%88%A8%E1%89%A0%E1%8B%8D-%E1%8B%A8%E1%88%98%E1%8C%BD%E1%88%90%E1%8D%8D-%E1%8C%8D%E1%88%9D%E1%8C%88%E1%88%9B-%E1%8B%A8%E1%89%B0%E1%88%B0%E1%8C%A0-%E1%88%9D%E1%88…
❤11
Click Instant view 🙏🙌 https://telegra.ph/Book-Review-bro-Kennan-Lemma-%E1%8B%A8%E1%8D%93%E1%88%AD%E1%8A%96%E1%88%B2%E1%88%B5-%E1%89%B5%E1%8B%8D%E1%88%8D%E1%8B%B5-07-07
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mere_protestantism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,156,356 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mere- Protestantism” (@mere_protestantism), 2,138 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mere_protestantism.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.