Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Эхо блиндажей

Channel

Эхо блиндажей

@mercOf2k17

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,116subscribers

+468 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002060763708
TypeChannel
Username@mercOf2k17
DescriptionЛюбим Россию, девочек и мемы. Самый гламурный канал милитари движа. Только авторский контент @EchoBlindage_bot - бот обратной связи
Created12 April 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mercOf2k17

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,6269,1168,8716 August 2026 — 8,648 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,646 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,643 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,626 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,631 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,653 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,677 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,726 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,763 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,909 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,959 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,976 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,965 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,974 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,990 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,016 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,036 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,053 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,055 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,064 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,065 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,063 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,082 subscribers9 November 2026 — 9,101 subscribers13 November 2026 — 9,116 subscribers6 August 202613 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 99 days, net +468. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,553–9,190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 14:579,116+15
9 Nov 2026, 07:019,101+19
5 Nov 2026, 12:599,082+19
2 Nov 2026, 03:049,063-2
30 Oct 2026, 03:489,065+1
27 Oct 2026, 06:179,064+9
24 Oct 2026, 05:379,055+2
21 Oct 2026, 10:119,053+17
18 Oct 2026, 05:479,036+20
14 Oct 2026, 22:299,016+26
11 Oct 2026, 19:388,990+16
5 Oct 2026, 17:028,974+9
27 Sept 2026, 17:368,965-11
17 Sept 2026, 23:378,976+17
14 Sept 2026, 01:578,959+50
9 Sept 2026, 22:368,909+146
4 Sept 2026, 16:208,763+37
31 Aug 2026, 23:298,726+49
25 Aug 2026, 15:248,677+24
19 Aug 2026, 05:138,653first reading

Engagement

160 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.0%
avg views ÷ 9,116 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,010
63 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
63
of 160 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 62 of 63 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held160 (23 June 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total189,570
Reactions total3,442
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 01:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,180
Videos
≈400
Links
≈427

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 34s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,545 reactions across 157 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52425790301667493703,93746.1%
custom 52583189428452834742,33027.3%
custom 53011612630977171407228.45%
custom 53393310282992993785866.86%
custom 53800004816470279604735.54%
👍3253.80%
🕊961.12%
🙏420.492%
custom 5325646781457918755340.398%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 158 of the 160 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,545 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 160 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
91
across the posts below
Posts paid on
30
of 160 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mercOf2k17. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 160 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 63 posts held from the last 30 days (9.52%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 10:27 UTC≈1,000 views24 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026
Photo

👍👍👍

custom 525831894284528347419custom 53011612630977171404custom 52425790301667493701

14 Nov 2026, 10:08 UTC≈1,090 views22 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026
Photo

Став жертвой 5g облучения, получив передозировку ИИ-слоп контентом, и находясь под постоянным наблюдением голубей-биороботов, админ сделал себе худи

custom 524257903016674937022

13 Nov 2026, 21:13 UTC≈1,400 views24 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026

Ладно, просто перепись подписчиков. Кто откуда, с каких городов?

custom 530116126309771714023custom 52583189428452834741

13 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTC≈1,870 views77 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Кстати, если бы Кал (именно кал) оф Дути, не было бы куском пропагандистского говна, а главные персонажи оказались бы в нынешних реалиях (СВОу) и воевали против русских, то судьба бы распределилась так: Капитан Прайс - кадровый британский офицер,доехал до передка и даже повоевал. Погиб от FPV-друна. Великопакистания скрыла факт его участия в боевых действиях на Украине и опубликовала скромный некролог, что во время…

custom 524257903016674937074custom 52583189428452834742custom 53011612630977171401

13 Nov 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,730 views25 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

Мне предложили идею: представителей новой субкультуры «слайдеров» привлечь к выполнению задач в зоне СВО. Мое мнение такое, что я не вижу в этом особого смысла, т.к. слайдерам нужен качественный и ровный асфальт. А Украина не имела его еще и до СВО. Так что не знаю, толку от них будет мало. Если у вас есть идеи как адаптировать личный состав слайдеров, то делитесь.

custom 524257903016674937025

13 Nov 2026, 09:51 UTC≈1,560 views72 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @oskolokfugasaPhoto

Осколок Фугаса. Подписаться

custom 524257903016674937063custom 52583189428452834748custom 53011612630977171401

12 Nov 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,780 views38 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 525831894284528347432custom 53011612630977171406

12 Nov 2026, 06:29 UTC≈3,970 views78 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 524257903016674937056custom 525831894284528347416custom 53011612630977171406

12 Nov 2026, 05:55 UTC≈1,670 views21 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @oskolokfugasaPhoto

Выражаю благодарность админу канала: https://t.me/mercOf2k17. Встретил, помог со шмурдяком, вкусно накормил и сводил на фан-встречу с альтушками. Лучший Осколок Фугаса. Подписаться

custom 524257903016674937016custom 52583189428452834743custom 53011612630977171402

12 Nov 2026, 04:26 UTC≈1,820 views66 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026

В ротную кассу скидываемся по 1000 морковок, командир наушники выиграть хочет.

custom 524257903016674937057custom 53011612630977171406custom 52583189428452834743

12 Nov 2026, 04:22 UTC≈2,590 views131 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026
Photo

Военнослужащие по контракту, довожу до вас, что с 2027 года денежное довольствие будет начисляться в морковках ОТ ОЗОНА.

custom 5242579030166749370104custom 525831894284528347423custom 53011612630977171404

11 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,860 views32 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @goidaborea88Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 524257903016674937021custom 52583189428452834747custom 53011612630977171404

Showing the 12 most recent of 160 posts we hold for @mercOf2k17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@mercOf2k17 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 November 2026
Most recent edit
14 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @mercOf2k17 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
20 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
28 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jun 2026, 19:57 UTCAnonymous Poll682 voters

Ладно А админа тут уважают?

  1. 👍👍👍49%
  2. 👎👎👎57%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 160 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FTF
@tactical_flava · 30,978
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 16 September 2026
Гостович 🎖
@ghostovich · 23,089
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 20 September 2026
W. M. P.
@warmempolit · 34,524
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 4 September 2026
БУХАНОЧКА W (PHONK REMIX)
@buhanochka_z · 33,531
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 30 September 2026
Каргач 🇷🇺⚡️Ꙃ
@karga4 · 22,192
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
Мёртвые головы
@Dead_heads · 33,249
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 3 September 2026
Рупор Фауста | Z
@Russian_Faus · 78,108
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 August 2026
war webm.
@warwebm · 69,727
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Эхо блиндажей” (@mercOf2k17), 9,116 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mercOf2k17.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.