Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mohit Agarwal - Divya Agarwal MEPL Students Community

Channel

Mohit Agarwal - Divya Agarwal MEPL Students Community

@meplclasses

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

37,441subscribers

-200 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001205544224
TypeChannel
Username@meplclasses
DescriptionThis is a CHANNEL of MEPL led by Mohit Agarwal Sir and Divya Agarwal Mam where we shall give Notes , Amendment video links & other information.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/meplclasses

Growth

37,44137,64137,5417 August 2026 — 37,641 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,632 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,617 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,597 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,570 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,544 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,524 subscribers14 August 2026 — 37,507 subscribers15 August 2026 — 37,483 subscribers17 August 2026 — 37,441 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -200. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,411–37,671 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:3637,441-42
15 Aug 2026, 19:5537,483-24
14 Aug 2026, 07:5737,507-17
12 Aug 2026, 21:4037,524-20
11 Aug 2026, 23:0537,544-26
11 Aug 2026, 01:3737,570-27
9 Aug 2026, 23:3737,597-20
8 Aug 2026, 21:4137,617-15
7 Aug 2026, 21:1137,632-9
7 Aug 2026, 05:1837,641first reading

Engagement

132 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.851%
avg views ÷ 37,441 subscribers
Avg views / post
319
124 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.402%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
132
of 132 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 124 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held132 (6 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total39,530
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,300
Videos
233
Links
16,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 22 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC566 viewsread 18 August 2026

V.V. Important Update 📢CMA Final - SCM & SFM Batch Announcement | MEPL Classes Watch Now :- https://youtu.be/2C82hI52vu4

17 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC171 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

A cheque is dishonoured for insufficiency of funds. Under Section 138, the payee must issue notice within:

  1. A) 15 days17%
  2. B) 30 days56%
  3. C) 45 days23%
  4. D) 60 days4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

17 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC145 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

A company’s Articles restrict a director from borrowing beyond ₹10 lakh. He borrows ₹20 lakh from an outsider who has no knowledge of the restriction. The loan is generally:

  1. A) Void against the company31%
  2. B) Binding on the company41%
  3. C) Voidable at director’s option22%
  4. D) Illegal6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

17 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC138 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

An agreement without consideration is generally:

  1. A) Valid8%
  2. B) Void65%
  3. C) Illegal12%
  4. D) Voidable15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

17 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC127 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

A minor enters into a contract. The contract is:

  1. A) Voidable14%
  2. B) Void ab initio77%
  3. C) Valid6%
  4. D) Illegal2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

17 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC63 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

A promises to pay B ₹50,000 if B does not marry C. B refuses to marry C. The agreement is:

  1. A) Valid12%
  2. B) Void48%
  3. C) Voidable28%
  4. D) Illegal11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

17 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC59 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

An agent, without authority, purchases goods for himself but subsequently the principal adopts the transaction. The act becomes:

  1. A) Void13%
  2. B) Voidable25%
  3. C) Binding on the principal60%
  4. D) Illegal3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

17 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC636 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇳 INDEPENDENCE DAY SPECIAL OFFER! 🇮🇳 Celebrate Freedom. Unlock Success! 🚀 🔥 Get 15% OFF On All Courses At MEPL Classes! 🎯 Use Promo Code: FREEDOM ⏳TODAY IS THE LAST DAY— Don’t Miss It! 📚 Learn From The Best. Prepare. Perform. Succeed. 🏆 🌐 www.meplclasses.com 📞 9830741471 #MEPLClasses #IndependenceDayOffer #FreedomOffer #15PercentOff #CMA #CA #CS #DivyaAgarwalMam

17 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC118 viewsread 18 August 2026

🚨 CA FOUNDATION ACCOUNTING — CLASS 7 IS HERE! 🚨 🎯 FAST-TRACK BATCH | TARGET 70+ MARKS 🔥 📅 17th August | Today ⏰ 11:15 AM 🏫 FACE-TO-FACE @ MEPL CLASSES 🔥 Learn Directly At The MEPL Institute 💻 LIVE @ HOME 📺 Join The LIVE Class On The MEPL CLASSES YouTube Channel ⚡ ONE CLASS. ONE GOAL. 70+ MARKS IN ACCOUNTING! 🏆 🚨 DON’T MISS — YOUR 70+ JOURNEY STARTS HERE! ▶️ WATCH LIVE ON MEPL CLASSES YOUTUBE CHANNEL: [https:/

16 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC127 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🚨 CA FOUNDATION SEP'26 ASPIRANTS, THIS IS YOUR ULTIMATE ECONOMICS REVISION BOOST! 🔥 🌟 Ultimate Revision Sessions For CA Foundation Business Economics – Sep'2026 Exams By Divya Agarwal Mam 🌟 📚 From Concept Clarity To Exam-Focused Revision — Get Ready To MASTER Business Economics With Divya Agarwal Mam! 💯 ⚡ High-Impact Revision | 🔥 Important Concepts | 🎯 Exam-Oriented Preparation 🚀 Revise Smarter. Practice Better.

16 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC185 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🚨🔥 CA FOUNDATION SEP’26 ASPIRANTS — THIS IS YOUR SIGN! 🔥🚨 📢 ALL SUBJECTS • FAST-TRACK BATCH • FULL-FLEDGED PREPARATION 🎯 ULTIMATE REVISION. SMART PRACTICE. EXAM-READY PREP! ✅ PYQ • RTP • MTP COVERED ✅ QUESTION SOLVING ✅ COMPLETE REVISION ✅ EXAM-FOCUSED APPROACH ⏳ DON’T WAIT FOR THE EXAMS TO GET SERIOUS! 🚀 START YOUR REVISION. BUILD YOUR CONFIDENCE. CRACK SEP’26! ▶️ WATCH NOW: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLT

16 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC83 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Ultimate Revision Sessions For CA Foundation Business Laws – Sep'2026 Exams By Divya Agarwal Mam 🌟 🚀 Elevate Your Preparation For The CA Foundation Business Law Exam With These Dynamic And Comprehensive Revision Sessions Led By Divya Agarwal Mam. 📚✨ ✅ These Sessions Are Meticulously Designed To Cover All Critical Topics, Ensuring A Thorough Understanding And Effective Practice Before The Exam. 💯📖 🔥 Join Now And

Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @meplclasses. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 19 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTCAnonymous Quiz51 voters

A company’s Articles restrict a director from borrowing beyond ₹10 lakh. He borrows ₹20 lakh from an outsider who has no knowledge of the restriction. The loan is generally:

  1. A) Void against the company31%
  2. B) Binding on the company41%
  3. C) Voidable at director’s option22%
  4. D) Illegal6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTCAnonymous Quiz84 voters

A minor enters into a contract. The contract is:

  1. A) Voidable14%
  2. B) Void ab initio77%
  3. C) Valid6%
  4. D) Illegal2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTCAnonymous Quiz80 voters

An agent, without authority, purchases goods for himself but subsequently the principal adopts the transaction. The act becomes:

  1. A) Void13%
  2. B) Voidable25%
  3. C) Binding on the principal60%
  4. D) Illegal3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTCAnonymous Quiz65 voters

An agreement without consideration is generally:

  1. A) Valid8%
  2. B) Void65%
  3. C) Illegal12%
  4. D) Voidable15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTCAnonymous Quiz132 voters

A promises to pay B ₹50,000 if B does not marry C. B refuses to marry C. The agreement is:

  1. A) Valid12%
  2. B) Void48%
  3. C) Voidable28%
  4. D) Illegal11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTCAnonymous Quiz115 voters

A cheque is dishonoured for insufficiency of funds. Under Section 138, the payee must issue notice within:

  1. A) 15 days17%
  2. B) 30 days56%
  3. C) 45 days23%
  4. D) 60 days4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 878,882 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mohit Agarwal - Divya Agarwal MEPL Students Community” (@meplclasses), 37,441 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meplclasses.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.