Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

vovose

@meowburp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

34subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004402926014
TypeChannel
Username@meowburp
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 7 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/meowburp

Growth

3411 Aug 2026, 03:16 — 34 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 14:07 — 34 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 03:1611 Aug 2026, 14:07
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–35 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 14:0734no change
11 Aug 2026, 03:1634first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
85.7%
avg views ÷ 34 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.1
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held17 (7 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total466
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53413800240522377211436.8%
custom 52311294204497240971128.9%
🕊821.1%
custom 533246633053049897637.89%
custom 535056256105187355725.26%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC18 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll
  1. традиш зарисовки в дневнике и реквестэ кривые89%
  2. стихи записочки может лора чутка33%
  3. пиздуй в основной артканал и рисуй картинки44%

The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTCviews —

vovose pinned «сборник I июнь-август #стихо@meowburp "мытыми 05.06 не хватало всего пуха тополиного снаружи лишь бы падать точкам группой под осеннюю попсу и желаю всем ни пуха ни пера ни тупой стужи пожелаю только выйти прогуляться по лесу все центральные равнины все…»

10 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC18 viewsread 11 August 2026

ну тоесть это не мои мысли не моя бошка я в стихах ток передаю мораль какуют которую хотел бы передать себе когдат

10 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

интересный факт человек от лица которого я пишу эти стишки именует себя как группа руского хипхопа (ЩТК) щитпост телеграм каннал например стихотво васнецова портрет имеет версию полного текста для трека на 2 минуты

custom 53505625610518735571

10 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC18 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

"правка 11.08 лечь? я лёг под девяносто и подумать, сколько раз волю я имел где просто стоило всё под отказ всё, я в плане, от тех мыслей, столько всех этих зараз - сколько было бы где иней падал сотнями на нас ни момента где нет снега - а песчинки летят вновь где кареты и элита - там все мемы про свекровь где уныние и ветер - там все страсти и всё в кровь и уйдут все эти мысли! так дженерится любовь я хотел иметь

custom 53324663305304989762custom 53413800240522377211

10 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC21 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

полночь чувак на улице сидит на скамье и хуярит в дуолинго на всю громкость

custom 52311294204497240971custom 53324663305304989761

10 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC26 viewsread 11 August 2026

мне такая хуйня с 14 лет не снилась

9 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC29 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

очень крутая магма была сёдн давно так не старался в ней как щас

custom 53413800240522377212

9 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC31 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ЭМ ахуеть я только сейчас заметил что у меня голос пиздец поменялся с лета прошлого и зимы этой........ я не могу выдавливать его как раньше и это сука плюс привычка ушла

🕊2custom 53413800240522377211

9 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC31 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

пью кока колу с сумкой кокакола и с пакетом из фикспрайса сижу на остановке под ксб мюзик выгляжу очень загадочно и блестяще и немного гладко

custom 53413800240522377212

8 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC34 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

сборник I июнь-август #стихо@meowburp "мытыми 05.06 не хватало всего пуха тополиного снаружи лишь бы падать точкам группой под осеннюю попсу и желаю всем ни пуха ни пера ни тупой стужи пожелаю только выйти прогуляться по лесу все центральные равнины все поляны и низины думал кто-то будет дождик но не дам я всем уйти правда видим птицы низко гром гремит и бьются шины а об что там бьются шины расскажу вам по пути вс

custom 53413800240522377217custom 52311294204497240971

8 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC34 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

луна ушла за горизонт где путь был самый млечный мой мелкий маленький там зонт потерян был навечно не спрятаться мне от дождя блин, вышел словно с речки где я, дождётся ли меня тарелка, с чаем, гречки я чую - то ли простыня, вот, то ли это нечто... быть может, летняя заря солгала мне про вечер вот я придумать всё не мог, кто виноватым будет возможно я и сам бы смог от ливня скрыться в полдень #стихо@meowburp

custom 52311294204497240976🕊2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @meowburp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters
  1. традиш зарисовки в дневнике и реквестэ кривые89%
  2. стихи записочки может лора чутка33%
  3. пиздуй в основной артканал и рисуй картинки44%

The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,045,181 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vovose” (@meowburp), 34 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meowburp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.