Для всех сомневающихся))) Нужен хороший план, немного отваги и вера в себя😹 Как ваши дела?
👍14😁9❤7👎1
Signed Екатерина Сова

Channel
@mentor_vkaif
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
191subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001946089079 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mentor_vkaif |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mentor_vkaif |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 191 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 192 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 194 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 194 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
364 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 141 | 38.7% | |
| 🔥 | 102 | 28.0% | |
| 👍 | 55 | 15.1% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 4.67% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 4.40% | |
| 🎄 | 12 | 3.30% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 2.20% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.37% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.549% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.549% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 364 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2024 to 22 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mentor_vkaif. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 September 2024 to 22 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Для всех сомневающихся))) Нужен хороший план, немного отваги и вера в себя😹 Как ваши дела?
👍14😁9❤7👎1
Signed Екатерина Сова
Поезд ушел? Во сколько поздно в 30?40?50? Хочу поделиться вот какими мыслями: ❤️Ко мне на консультации регулярно приходят люди с похожими переживаниями по поводу того, что они упустили: ❤️время, ❤️возможности, ❤️предложения ❤️отношения ❤️права ❤️контакт с собой ❤️удовольствия То есть, не отреагировали вовремя на внешние обстоятельства! Возможно поступали из каких- то правил или привычек, потому что так заведено …
🔥13👍9❤7👎1
Signed Екатерина Сова
Какие вкусняхи любите? Вот те и берите с собой) Почти год меня тут не было. Так на долго я ещё не пряталась)) ну потому что я не справилась… не до конца верила сама себе. За этот год: 1 осталась без основной работы, потом ещё раз без работы 2 Завела собаку 3 Узнала, что заправляться можно и не до полного бака 4 Что количество образований влияет на количество дипломов, без умения «продавать» свои навыки - ты п…
❤32🔥22🥰13
Signed Екатерина Сова
Channel photo updated
С Новым годом) К вам тоже уже пришел?))))
🔥7❤6🎄4
Signed Екатерина Сова
Video message, posted without a caption
🎄8🔥7❤6
Signed Екатерина Сова
Как продают нашему РЕБЕНКУ? Без нашего ведома) Любая продажа это игра, флирт удовольствие от которых должны получать оба участника и участвовать на равных) Иногда можно увидеть вот такую игру: На первый взгляд озвучены 2 очевидных факта : «вещь лучше» и «вы не можете ее себе позволить», которые адресованы «Взрослому» покупателю Нооооооо Скрытый посыл направлен на «Ребенка») такое предложение рождает желание дока…
❤10🔥7🥰3👍1
Signed Екатерина Сова
Худшая продажа с манипуляцией Манипулируй, управляй, пусть купят любой ценой, все потом … Наблюдаю тенденцию обучения продажам: Любым способом вывести человека на разговор и «присунуть». Лишь бы завязать разговор. Этому учат и специалисты это применяют. Рассылка в личку особое мероприятие. Такое общение может быть расценено вашими подписчиками как личное внимание/участие, или как наглое вторжение в личное простра…
❤14⚡4👍4
Signed Екатерина Сова
Вы играли в Лила? Я ни разу. Ни разу не возникала даже идея сыграть. Слышала, видела, но так сказать не испытавала…. Вчера игра нашла меня сама) да еще и с правом участвовать в ведении игры. Из важного: - просела в энергии, потому что очень стараюсь - не думать в моменте, смотреть в перспективу -отдавать надо больше, жадина 🤣 -кайфовать, радоваться - мой социальный лифт порой движется неожиданно, но для этого есть…
❤🔥8❤5🔥4👏1
Signed Екатерина Сова
Привееееет, Давай знакомиться? 😉 Здесь много новеньких, предлагаю узнать друг друга поближе 🤩 Я Екатерина Сова, коуч, хакер продаж через изменение мышления и понимание психологии клиента 😁 Двое серьезных отношений удачно конвертировала в двоих детей и кота))) 😄 Главный принцип: Продажи это легко, если продавать с УМОМ. Точно тут не будет Википедии, здесь я стараюсь создать дружескую атмосферу, где-то посмеемся, г…
👍9❤7🔥4
Signed Екатерина Сова
Диалоги, которые продают Диалог в продажах это не поочередное высказывание друг за другом, как мы привыкли понимать это слово. Диалог- это когда один говорит, а второй показывает, что слушает. И не обязательно второй должен в это время что-то говорить) Физически больно - молчать, когда кто-то говорит, а ты уже знаешь, что ему ответить и надо дослушать до конца! Или не продолжать его мысли и предложения если он за…
🔥8❤7👍6
Signed Екатерина Сова
Много мемов с этим «потому что»)) Для мозга иногда хватает и ответа «потому что» без объяснения . Помните в детстве: - Маааам, ну почему? -Потому что. Все 🤣
💯2😁2❤1👍1🔥1
Signed Екатерина Сова
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mentor_vkaif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что добавить на канал? Интересно ли вам читать/наблюдать Прошу вашего внимания, потому что очень люблю 😻 общаться💥 да и канал хочется сделать интересным прежде всего для вас)
The shares total 200%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2024 to 22 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,388,209 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Катя Сова | Тупиков.NET” (@mentor_vkaif), 191 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mentor_vkaif.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.