Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

once a creator

@mentolbe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,006subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002007926513
TypeChannel
Username@mentolbe
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mentolbe

Growth

1,0061,0331,019.57 August 2026 — 1,033 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,033 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,006 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,002–1,037 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 07:261,006-22
8 Aug 2026, 08:581,028-5
8 Aug 2026, 00:211,033no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:121,033first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 10 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3626.7%
🔥2317.0%
custom 5298780919207844086139.63%
custom 5256053622474553432128.89%
107.41%
custom 530331003094095243996.67%
custom 522006908079861144885.93%
❤‍🔥53.70%
👍42.96%
👏42.96%
custom 526523414513453329832.22%
21.48%
🆒21.48%
👾21.48%
💯21.48%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mentolbe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 13 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 22:21 UTC125 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Бриллиант — не просто предмет роскоши, а сжатая до предела форма смысла, где каждая грань работает на сверкание целого. Так и слоган: он не объясняет, не развёртывает, не утомляет — он мгновенно собирает идею в кристалл, в котором бренд, эмоция и обещание соединяются в ослепительную точку. Если смотреть глубже, бриллиант — это торжество дисциплины над хаосом, а слоган — торжество точности над многословием. В обоих с

9custom 52560536224745534323custom 529878091920784408632

10 Jul 2026, 04:03 UTC132 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @incommhsePhoto

От стратегии для «Золотого кольца России» до проекта для «Спортса»: о чём писали дипломы студенты СПК 🔑 В этом году на программе «Стратегия и продюсирование в коммуникациях» впервые прошли защиты дипломных проектов. Это очень важный и волнительный момент для программы и всей Школы коммуникаций 💜 Уже завтра выпускники СПК получат первые дипломы, а пока предлагаем заглянуть в карточки и узнать, над какими проектами о

🔥6custom 52987809192078440862custom 52200690807986114481custom 53033100309409524391

7 Jul 2026, 05:48 UTC185 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

БСПК, не останавливайтесь! Рекламное искусство в долгу не останется.

11custom 53033100309409524393custom 52560536224745534322💯1

3 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC234 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Юваль Ноа Харари: ИИ давно не инструмент Не все тезисы бесспорны, но из песни (пропетой автором термина бесполезный класс футурологом Харари в Давосе полгода назад) слов не выкинешь. 1. ИИ — автономный агент В отличие от прошлых технологий (от топора до бомбы), которые были лишь инструментами, ИИ — первый в истории самостоятельный агент. Он способен автономно принимать решения и генерировать новые идеи. 2. Взлом я

👍2custom 52560536224745534322💯1

25 Jun 2026, 17:07 UTC272 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Первый выпуск БСПК 👸 Лучшие из лучших рассказывают о своих проектах на сайте Школы коммуникаций НИУ ВШЭ «Для меня это был не просто учебный проект»: состоялись первые защиты дипломных проектов студентов программы «Стратегия и продюсирование в коммуникациях»

9custom 529878091920784408653custom 53033100309409524391

21 Jun 2026, 05:08 UTC316 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

И вот мы стоим на границе, но границы больше нет. ("Более мрачную версию" не надо, Perplexity — так вполне ок.) Кто поймёт/угадает, чей поэтический стиль здесь был запрошен, тому бонус-десятка пожизненное уважение. Первые догадки у меня в личных сообщениях — даже близко нет. Для начала: это XIX век и это не Россия.

🔥5👾2custom 53033100309409524391

20 Jun 2026, 05:26 UTC204 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

О вечном продлении жизни и "скорости убегания" пишет сегодняшний Business Today: Могут ли нынешние 40-летние жить вечно? Известный футуролог утверждает, что старение прекратится к 2032 году Перевод статьи, 20 июня 2026 г.

custom 52652341451345332983custom 53033100309409524392👏1custom 52560536224745534321

19 Jun 2026, 10:01 UTC263 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

«Мой ресурс убеждения ограничен, поэтому ПОВТОРЮ ГЛАВНОЕ: делайте всё возможное, ЧТОБЫ ОСТАВАТЬСЯ ЖИВЫМИ И ЗДОРОВЫМИ ПРЯМО СЕЙЧАС». Разговор о будущем с футурологом Рэем Курцвейлом, полная расшифровка в PDF-файле. Январь 2026 года. ___________ Точность предсказаний и экспоненциальное мышление Когда в 2005 году вышла книга Рэя, эксперты посчитали его прогнозы слишком радикальными; они думали, что предсказанные им п

7custom 52987809192078440863👍2

18 Jun 2026, 12:59 UTC195 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ПОЗДРАВЛЯЮ, ВЫ БЕССМЕРТНЫ™ Прошло три года Вышки, мой первый первый курс прекрасно себя защитил — ему и посвящаю пост: о том, что будет с нами через три года. Наша точка невозврата замерла на отметке 2029, когда, если верить визионерам, мы соскочим со счётчика и станем бессмертными. Я не шучу, какие тут шутки. Дембель из биологической юдоли это славно, но есть нюанс: такой таймлайн без гайдлайна станет самым душны

custom 52200690807986114487👏3custom 52560536224745534323🔥2

17 Jun 2026, 10:34 UTC219 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В конце очередного учебного трека часто происходит что-то знаковое. Переворачиваешь страницу, начинаешь новую. Говорят, формат ВКР может измениться и дипломники станут защищать работающие стартапы, а не бренд-стратегии на сто страниц. Кажется, такое будущее вот-вот наступит. Утром в одну забытую Тг-группу мне написали студенты Вышки. Из-за дипломников не общался с ними с самой зимы — но они обо мне не забыли. И ра

🔥106❤‍🔥5🆒21custom 52560536224745534321custom 53033100309409524391

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mentolbe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 999,896 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“once a creator” (@mentolbe), 1,006 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mentolbe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.