Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

IELTS with Alisher | Mentee Labs

@menteelabs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

93subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004463502133
TypeChannel
Username@menteelabs
DescriptionЕсли у тебя B2 и ты хочешь себе 8.0, этот Телеграм канал для тебя🚀 Писать менеджеру – @imreo
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/menteelabs

Growth

929392.57 August 2026 — 92 subscribers8 August 2026 — 93 subscribers9 August 2026 — 93 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92–93 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 13:1793no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:5393+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:3292first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
277.8%
avg views ÷ 93 subscribers
Avg views / post
258
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (31 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total4,651
Reactions total121
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

121 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥3730.6%
3528.9%
😍3226.4%
🥰97.44%
🙏86.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC16 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔥Writing 5.0 —> 6.5 за меньше чем месяц У меня был Writing 5.0, а для поступления нужно было минимум 6.0. Опыт работы с вами был очень позитивным. Мне нравилось, какой подробный и понятный фидбек я получала после каждого эссе. Уроки проходили легко и комфортно, а больше всего мне запомнилась поддержка перед экзаменом. Когда перед IELTS я сказала, что для уверенности хочу написать ещё одно эссе, меня не стали остан

❤‍🔥2😍1

9 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC26 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Гоу сегодня вечером разберем вот это задание? Попалось на реальном IELTS😨

4❤‍🔥4🙏3

9 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC29 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Еще два невероятно крутых кейса на подходе😻

3❤‍🔥3🥰2😍1

8 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC56 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔥B2 —> Writing 7.0 & Overall 7.5 мне очень понравилось то что вы показали структуру для каждого типа эссе, и как во время уроков показали как можно сделать лучше/альтернативу. я по началу думала что в райтинге больше внимания уделяют крутым аругментам (из за чего я тратила много времени на эссе), но вы показали что легкое эссе с крутой структурой и раскрытой идеей играет больше роли. спасибо за курс, реально помогло

3❤‍🔥2😍2

7 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC78 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Еще один очень приятный кейс на подходе😎 Ученики просто в ударе🔥

😍4❤‍🔥3🥰2

6 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC112 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔥B1+ —> 6.0 Writing, 7.0 Overall Разложили по полочкам структуру эссе и показал, как нормально раскрывать тему в Task Response, чтобы не застревать на уровне 6.0. Фидбек всегда по делу, сразу видно, где косяки в логике или связках. За эти две недели реально набил руку, перестал тратить кучу времени на придумывание аргументов и начал писать более структурировано. Интенсив отличный, за короткое время дает хороший буст

😍3❤‍🔥21

6 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC132 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥰2😍2❤‍🔥1🙏1

6 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC123 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Пост, где объясняю правила

❤‍🔥21😍1

6 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC124 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Возможность получить фидбек на IELTS Writing от Алишера (7.5 Writing) Заполнение формы – https://forms.gle/C9p6FweJRQWTeLv47

2😍2🙏2

5 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC154 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Новый пример райтинга в моем сборнике. Бегом разбирать! TASK 2: In today’s world, private companies, rather than the government, pay for and conduct most scientific research. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Задание попалось на реальном IELTS в августе. @self_founder

3😍2🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @menteelabs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 246,085 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IELTS with Alisher | Mentee Labs” (@menteelabs), 93 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/menteelabs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.