Channel
@mentalsh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,393subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001916124541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mentalsh |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mentalsh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 1,393 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 1,394 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 1,397 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 1,397 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,851 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,851 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,851reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2025 to 21 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mentalsh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 February 2025 to 21 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🍄 Когда мы слишком долго сдерживаем себя, сила воли иссякает, и в итоге может возникнуть сильный стресс, который осложняет работу и общение 🤍 Чтобы этого избежать, важно осознанно выявлять, что именно вызывает напряжение в жизни и взаимодействиях. Это позволит предотвратить накопление проблем и реагировать на них до того, как ситуация станет критической
❤131
Video, posted without a caption
❤112
🍄 Асинхронные контакты, такие как подписки в мессенджерах и социальных сетях, помогают поддерживать связь и создают возможность для небольших взаимодействий, что способствует сближению 🤍Эти «социальные соприкосновения» облегчают личные встречи, поскольку у вас уже есть темы для обсуждения, а также снижают социальный барьер, особенно для тех, кто испытывает трудности в установлении прямого контакт
❤85
🍄 Может произойти ситуация, когда привычные подходы перестают работать. Это может произойти на работе, в отношениях, в дружбе или в быту — момент, когда ты понимаешь, что прежний механизм окончательно сломался и двигаться нужно новыми путями. 🤍 Хотя это болезненно, признание: «Я так больше не могу» приносит освобождение, позволяя высвободить энергию на поиск новых решений и активировать творческое мышление
❤87
Video, posted without a caption
❤102
🍄 Маленькие системные шаги являются наиболее надежным способом достижения долгосрочного успеха. Такой подход позволяет постепенно выстраивать привычки и достигать целей, не перегружая себя 🤍 Постепенные изменения влекут за собой устойчивые результаты и помогают избежать выгорания
❤92
🍄 Не обязательно эмоционально синхронизироваться с каждым человеком, с которым ты общаешься в течение дня. Важно понимать, что некоторые взаимодействия могут быть поверхностными и не требуют глубокой эмоциональной связи. 🤍 Фокусируясь на тех, кто действительно важен, можно сохранить эмоциональную энергию и избежать перегрузки
❤100
Video, posted without a caption
❤104
Video, posted without a caption
❤79
🍄 Плохое начало дня не определяет его плохой исход. Даже если утро было неудачным, есть возможность изменить настроение и ситуацию в течение дня. 🤍 Важно помнить, что каждый момент дает шанс на позитивные изменения
❤95
🍄 Когда к вам приходят с советом, прежде чем действовать, ответьте себе на 2 вопроса: - Хотел ли бы я жить так, как живет этот человек? - Хотел ли бы я иметь такие же отношения / работу / деньги, как этот человек? 🤍 Если ответы на эти вопросы отрицательные, стоит поискать другие пути
❤90
🍄 Отношение к внешности и телу окружающих напрямую влияет на то, как мы воспринимаем себя. Когда привычка критиковать других находит отклик внутри, важно менять эту практику, замечая положительные качества у окружающих. 🤍 Фокусируясь на том, что нравится в других, легче начать видеть и ценить свою красоту
❤80
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mentalsh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 730,929 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гриб моральной поддержки” (@mentalsh), 1,393 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mentalsh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.