Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mental Psychology

Channel

Mental Psychology

@mental_psychology

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,368subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001286278990
TypeChannel
Username@mental_psychology
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mental_psychology

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@tvoya_psyholog/1598416 May 2024, 09:08 UTC@mental_psychology/1723 · this entry16 May 2024, 09:08 UTC1.00under a minute
@tvoya_psyholog/1599227 Jul 2024, 23:00 UTC@mental_psychology/1733 · this entry27 Jul 2024, 23:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@mental_psychology/1734 · this entry31 Jul 2024, 10:24 UTC@tvoya_psyholog/1599331 Jul 2024, 10:25 UTC1.0072 seconds
@mental_psychology/1735 · this entry21 Aug 2024, 20:49 UTC@tvoya_psyholog/1599421 Aug 2024, 20:49 UTC1.00under a minute
@mental_psychology/1736 · this entry31 Aug 2024, 22:44 UTC@tvoya_psyholog/1599531 Aug 2024, 22:44 UTC1.00under a minute
@tvoya_psyholog/159974 Nov 2024, 21:27 UTC@mental_psychology/1738 · this entry4 Nov 2024, 21:27 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@tvoya_psyholog11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.99under a minutethis entry (65)
@forever_versia_sebya11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (101)
@kirsanovmed11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (74)
@znay_sebe9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (54)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 14 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 May 2024 to 20 March 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @tvoya_psyholog. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,3681,3721,3707 August 2026 — 1,372 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,372 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,370 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,368 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,367–1,373 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:081,368-2
14 Aug 2026, 00:571,370-2
8 Aug 2026, 08:231,372no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:321,372first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

20 Mar 2025, 10:05 UTC≈2,720 viewsread 7 August 2026

Лучшие мужские каналы! 1) Морячок 2) Good Master 3) Главный👷‍♂️инженер 4) СМЕКАЛКА 5) Бар на диване 6) Сделано Руками 7) Танки Мира 😍 Блог врача Андролога 9) Военная техника

8 Dec 2024, 02:34 UTC≈3,770 viewsread 7 August 2026

Чтобы недотрога взяла твой член в рот, изучи это: Во-первых, недотрог не существует, если девушка не дает — дело только в тебе, во-вторых, есть инструкция после которой даст любая О таком не говорят бесплатно, но канал PLASH разъебал всех псевдо-пикаперов и просто слил это Тебе не нужно сутками качаться в зале, нужно просто взломать женскую психологию Зайди — изучи и трахни: https://t.me/+zk9IwpPYPxtkZjcy

29 Nov 2024, 12:25 UTC≈3,150 viewsread 7 August 2026

Голые фото девочек, уже здесь 👇 http://t.me/+KYSDv5kNaGU0NDcy

6 Nov 2024, 14:15 UTC≈3,200 viewsread 7 August 2026

Не трахай ручку, еби ручку вместе с этим каналом - https://t.me/+2Tu81QoakTYxODIy

4 Nov 2024, 21:27 UTC≈2,840 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ты так и пишешь ей: «Как дела? Может погуляем?»... Мда, а мог бы уже соблазнить её. На канале тебя ждут: – Готовые фразы для соблазнения девушки через переписку – Инструкция, чтобы тра*нуть её у себя дома – Гайд на незабываемое первое свидание – Фразы, которые 100% соблазнят любую девушку Автор написал готовые шаблоны для различных ситуаций. Эти советы обеспечат тебе успех. Любую проблему с девушками решить проще

25 Sept 2024, 18:34 UTC≈2,700 viewsread 7 August 2026

Даже самую неприступную можно смачно трахнуть Запомни, дружище, недотрог не существует. Если дама не дает — значит дело в тебе, слабачок Ладно, держи канал МакТрахер. Здесь автор каждый день еб#т новых баб и показывает, как научиться также Как он это делает — это просто искусство, а самое главное, что попадая к нему в канал, любая девушка откроет для вас свою ракушку Сюда попадают только избранные, добро пожалова

31 Aug 2024, 22:44 UTC≈2,630 viewsread 7 August 2026

Жарить, понравившихся девушек - мечта любого неудачника Потому что те, кто читают Прожарку, не мечтают, а трахают: • Фразы для переписки, после которых она даст • Способ раздвинуть ей ноги на первой встрече • Приём влюбляющий в тебя любую девушку Не мечтай - трахай: t.me/joinchat/ulUKtpjj_kw1YjZi

21 Aug 2024, 20:49 UTC≈2,430 viewsread 7 August 2026

Что ты тут забыл? Саморазвиваешься? Пытаешься стать лучшей версией себя? Не смеши. Ты либо пытаешься бежать от бедности, либо забиваешь голову ненужной информацией Перепрошивай себя и свое мышление, и тогда все свои накопленные знания ты сможешь применить для лучшей жизни И пока ты еще не гребаный пенсионер тебе не надо уделять этому часы в день, достаточно лишь 10 минут в канале Время Мотивации На каждом углу т

31 Jul 2024, 10:24 UTC≈2,080 viewsread 7 August 2026

Даже самую неприступную можно смачно трахнуть Запомни, дружище, недотрог не существует. Если дама не дает —значит дело в тебе, слабачок Ладно, держи канал МакТрахер Здесь автор каждый день еб#т новых баб и показывает, как научится также Как он это делает — это просто искусство , а самое главное, что попадая к нему в канал, любая девушка откроет для вас свою ракушку Сюда попадают только избранные, добро пожалов

27 Jul 2024, 23:00 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 7 August 2026

Даже самую неприступную можно смачно трахнуть Запомни, дружище, недотрог не существует. Если дама не дает — значит дело в тебе, слабачок Ладно, держи канал Ма кТрахер. Здесь автор каждый день еб#т новых баб и показывает, как научиться также Как он это делает — это просто искусство , а самое главное, что попадая к нему в канал, любая девушка откроет для вас свою ракушку Сюда попадают только избранные, добро пожа

22 Jul 2024, 21:59 UTC≈1,540 viewsread 7 August 2026

Влюби в себя человека и он сделает Всё, что ты захочешь! 🔞 Будьте осторожны, данные техники сводят с ума. Психолог который подвергался пыткам простым языком объясняет как: — Как одним лишь взглядом вызывать доверие к себе? «жми» — Как без унижений поставить человека на место? — За 1 минуту сломать любого и достичь желаемого (тут) ⚠️Используй эти техники с осторожностью — 🌟Психология убеждения 🌟Психотропик 🌟 Твоё

22 Jul 2024, 21:58 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 7 August 2026

Влюби в себя человека и он сделает Всё, что ты захочешь! 🔞 Будьте осторожны, данные техники сводят с ума. Психолог который подвергался пыткам простым языком объясняет как: — Как одним лишь взглядом вызывать доверие к себе? «жми» — Как без унижений поставить человека на место? — За 1 минуту сломать любого и достичь желаемого (тут) ⚠️Используй эти техники с осторожностью — 🌟Психология убеждения 🌟Психотропик 🌟 Твоё

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mental_psychology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 392,014 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mental Psychology” (@mental_psychology), 1,368 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mental_psychology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.