Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 萌豚通讯社(Mengtun News)

Channel

萌豚通讯社(Mengtun News)

@mengtunnews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,475subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001219605792
TypeChannel
Username@mengtunnews
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mengtunnews

Growth

1,4751,4951,4856 August 2026 — 1,495 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,495 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,493 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,492 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,491 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,487 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,483 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,481 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,477 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,475 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 30 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,472–1,498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 04:011,475-2
1 Sept 2026, 21:271,477-4
26 Aug 2026, 15:541,481-2
23 Aug 2026, 21:081,483-4
20 Aug 2026, 05:411,487-4
16 Aug 2026, 22:061,491-1
13 Aug 2026, 08:151,492-1
10 Aug 2026, 03:211,493-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:371,495no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:161,495first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 September 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16m 50s
Average length
1m 41s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

344 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁9928.8%
🤡6017.4%
🤮3911.3%
🤔308.72%
🎉226.40%
👍174.94%
😢154.36%
👏123.49%
😱92.62%
💩82.33%
🥰82.33%
72.03%
🤬72.03%
💯51.45%
🤣41.16%
👎20.581%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 344 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2022 to 21 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 May 2024, 01:43 UTC≈2,380 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ProgressiveLighthouse

Genocide Joe:国际刑事法庭检察官申请获得起诉以色列领袖们的逮捕令实在是让人无法接受。 以色列不愧是美国的宗主国,听说Netanyahu即将成为国际通缉犯后大孝子急坏了,忙着撒泼打滚告诉全世界他心里有老父亲,Trump没兴趣也做不到像Biden一样对以色列有这种邪教徒一般的狂热支持,他凡事论一个钱字,以色列出不起钱就会被Trump踢开,只有Biden宁可丢掉政治资本和人心也要力挺以色列。 媒体之前不是多次报道Biden对Netanyahu十分不满,私底下屡次爆粗吗?就跟那可前可后灵活跳动的红线一样,Biden对Netanyahu本身的暧昧态度就耐人寻味,他是唯一一个宁愿输大选坐牢也要支持以色列的政客。他的这份孝心实在是难能可贵,要是Trump不满足他以身殉道支持以色列的心意实在是说不过去。 #GenocideJoe #ICC #Netanyahu #LockThemUp

🤡6🥰42🤔1

20 May 2024, 13:48 UTC≈1,900 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

国际刑事法院(ICC)的首席检察官@KarimKhanQC宣布,将申请针对本雅明·内塔尼亚胡和以色列国防部长约阿夫·加兰特的逮捕令。 检察官Karim A.A. Khan表示,内塔尼亚胡和加兰特都对一系列“战争罪”负有刑事责任,包括对平民实施饥饿、故意造成严重伤害、故意杀害以及有意对平民进行攻击。他在ICC的声明中写道:“我们认为所指控的反人类罪是作为针对巴勒斯坦平民人口的广泛和系统性袭击的一部分。根据我们的评估,这些罪行至今仍在继续。”检察官表示,他的办公室拥有大量证据,包括视频和幸存者的采访。 此外,检察官还指控哈马斯领袖Yahya Sinwar,并将对其发布逮捕令。Sinwar被认为是10月7日袭击的幕后主使。 https://twitter.com/IntlCrimCourt/status/1792511246769570084

4🤣4

14 May 2024, 01:52 UTC≈1,640 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

https://twitter.com/HoyPalestina/status/1790139237666291864

🎉3👏3💯1

14 May 2024, 01:50 UTC≈1,290 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

荷兰警察暴力殴打阿姆斯特丹大学抗议种族灭绝的学生 https://twitter.com/martijntjesmits/status/1790020165276442749

👍3💯3👏2

14 May 2024, 01:28 UTC≈1,130 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

今天在西岸的塔尔库米亚(Tarqumiya)过境点,以色列右翼人士阻止了前往加沙的救援卡车并销毁救援物资。 https://x.com/BarakRavid/status/1790015282490101762

🎉4👎2

13 May 2024, 11:48 UTC≈1,120 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

美国共和党参议员Graham发表言论说:“广岛和长崎的原子弹投掷导致了战争的结束。为了保卫以色列,需要类似的进一步的攻击加沙。” #短评 Graham的言论已被“大翻译”到了日推 https://twitter.com/atsyjp/status/1789228860170805677

🤬4💯1

13 May 2024, 05:32 UTC960 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

星巴克因为支持以色列被抵制,今年以来股价下跌近30%,市值蒸发几百亿美元。 #短评 就算是因为反工会被抵制了也是好死的。 https://twitter.com/LadyVelvet_HFQ/status/1789144700756120012

🎉9🤮3

12 May 2024, 08:50 UTC≈1,170 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

一年半过去了,调查一下现在各位的立场

  1. 反对川普,支持拜登30%
  2. 川普拜登都反对,但更反川普31%
  3. 川普拜登都反对,但因为以色列拜登必须下台27%
  4. 我本来就是川粉17%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🤮2

12 May 2024, 08:31 UTC971 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

一直都在,没更新因为太忙加上太懒,,,

🥰4🤮1

6 Nov 2022, 10:28 UTC≈14,800 views88 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

川普再次吹嘘和习的关系:我与习总统的关系非常好,现在他是终身总统,我称呼他为国王。 #Trump https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1589044885239234562

🤡54😁34

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mengtunnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 May 2024, 08:50 UTCAnonymous Poll208 voters

一年半过去了,调查一下现在各位的立场

  1. 反对川普,支持拜登30%
  2. 川普拜登都反对,但更反川普31%
  3. 川普拜登都反对,但因为以色列拜登必须下台27%
  4. 我本来就是川粉17%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2022 to 21 May 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“萌豚通讯社(Mengtun News)” (@mengtunnews), 1,475 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mengtunnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.