Канал переименован. Теперь я — “Даша Нашлася”. Суть та же: находки, фото, мысли. Просто теперь у этого места есть имя.🤩 Добро пожаловать 🤩 #welcome #блог #находки #обзоры и #фотки
❤2👍1custom 54588939413382850501

Channel
@memooflash
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003192575138 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @memooflash |
| Description | Life style и beauty прямиком из Москвы📍 Мой взгляд на мир — в каждом кадре. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/memooflash |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 9 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 9 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
18 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 38.9% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 27.8% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5458893941338285050 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| custom 4920519387057750702 | 1 | 5.56% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 21 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Канал переименован. Теперь я — “Даша Нашлася”. Суть та же: находки, фото, мысли. Просто теперь у этого места есть имя.🤩 Добро пожаловать 🤩 #welcome #блог #находки #обзоры и #фотки
❤2👍1custom 54588939413382850501
Channel name was changed to «⋆. 𐙚 Даша Нашлася 𝜗𝜚˚⋆»
Я нашла какое-то идеальное лип комбо. Абсолютно случайно, совместила супер бюджетный продукт с люксом😍😍😍 Я в восторге!!! Нетипично? Да. А почему бы и нет? 🐒 Арт. тинта на вб: 114428288 Карандаш брала в Sephora (но в мск точно есть на сайте USmall и должен быть в ЗЯ, но дороже) #липкомбо #huda #luxvisage #бьюти #косметика
👍1🔥1custom 54588939413382850501
И так, я сходила в «Улыбку радуги»! 🩷🩷🩷 Про этот магазин часто молчат, сейчас модно говорить лишь про ЗЯ (не отнять, он хорош), РИВ ГОШ и Летуаль. Да, радуга попроще. Но хочу рассказать и показать, что стоит брать и что не стоит! 1) unsexy тюбик (подходит в рубрику #напротивЛюкса) крема для рук. «Оливково-глицериновый» от Невской косметики (когда нибудь я мне пришлют что-то на рекламу, обязательно) — простой, дешёвый…
❤1custom 49205193870577507021
Ем блины, собираюсь на улицу… Из окна — там нет обещанного вчера пиздеца. В любом случае надо идти… Я же люблю зиму.❄️ ❄️ Что надо сделать? Хочу сделать мини обзор на магазин, который часто обходят стороной, сделать распечатки по работе, забрать Алик (там снова всякая ерунда) и самое главное попробовать новое меню в БК (там КиШ с этого дня, посыпка какая-то для картошки, соус вкусный). Так что, погнали в метелицу…👋👋👋…
👍3🔥1
Витрина ♥️ как я люблю вдыхать эти ароматы … #новаязаря @novayazaria #любовь #vintage #aesthetic #parfum #краснаяМосква
❤2🔥1
Огуречный крем для лица… 🥒🤩 Жду тепла, чтобы им пользоваться. (Я бы сказала — это рубрика #напротивЛюкса) Крем для жирной и комби кожи от Невской косметики (кстати, им уже 186 лет) — лёгкий, свежий, идеально подходит для жирной и комбинированной кожи.🤩 Что он делает? ✅ Увлажняет ✅ Тонизирует ✅ Выравнивает цвет лица ✅ Повышает упругость И да, пахнет действительно, как свежий огурчик с грядки… Не липнет, не тяжёлый —…
👍2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @memooflash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@memooflash named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⋆. 𐙚 Даша Нашлася 𝜗𝜚˚⋆” (@memooflash), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/memooflash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.