Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

RETURN OF THE 100X

@memewars25

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

38,884subscribers

-202 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002177891504
TypeChannel
Username@memewars25
DescriptionGet access to exclusive weekly meme opportunities and discover the next 100x project! 🚀 NO VIP here; we prioritize FairPlay! Join us and let’s thrive together! DYOR Inquires: @alt_supporter Feedback: @returnofthe100xchat
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/memewars25

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@memewars25/21801 · this entry7 May 2026, 17:23 UTC@apingdegen/231887 May 2026, 17:24 UTC1.00under a minute
@memewars25/21803 · this entry7 May 2026, 17:45 UTC@apingdegen/231907 May 2026, 17:45 UTC1.00under a minute
@memewars25/21806 · this entry7 May 2026, 18:12 UTC@apingdegen/231937 May 2026, 18:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@memewars25/21807 · this entry7 May 2026, 18:59 UTC@apingdegen/231947 May 2026, 18:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@memewars25/21813 · this entry7 May 2026, 20:15 UTC@apingdegen/231997 May 2026, 20:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@memewars25/21818 · this entry8 May 2026, 04:37 UTC@apingdegen/232068 May 2026, 04:38 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@apingdegen10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (91)
@memetakeovers10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (91)
@SolVigilantes10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (91)
@pepeknowsbest10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (91)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 May 2026 to 8 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @pepeknowsbest. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

38,88439,08638,9857 August 2026 — 39,086 subscribers7 August 2026 — 39,086 subscribers8 August 2026 — 39,063 subscribers9 August 2026 — 39,025 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38,982 subscribers11 August 2026 — 38,943 subscribers12 August 2026 — 38,884 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -202. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,854–39,116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:5238,884-59
11 Aug 2026, 06:1138,943-39
10 Aug 2026, 07:2338,982-43
9 Aug 2026, 07:1339,025-38
8 Aug 2026, 04:5439,063-23
7 Aug 2026, 14:4539,086no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:3939,086first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,940
Videos
31
Links
651

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

8 May 2026, 05:17 UTC≈5,530 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🦠 Pandemic mode continued as $HENTAI continued to spread all across the blockchain and the trenches! In our last update, we were just shy of a $2 million market cap—and we’ve now officially cleared it 💨 Despite multiple dips, we’ve bounced back each time and come back even stronger! $HENTAI Updated ATH Stats below: ⬇️ • $6.0M in volume (past 24 hours) • ATH increase of 1,190x 🔥 • $2.3M peak market cap • Trending

8 May 2026, 05:00 UTC≈3,510 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$HENTAI Is INFECTIOUS to the Max 🦠 - Launched just 1 day and 4 hours ago - $6M in 24-hour volume—crazy! - Funds keep pouring in nonstop - Still rocking the DEX Top 5 - Biggest buzz this week—and we’re only getting started New all-time high update coming soon—stay tuned! 👀

8 May 2026, 04:37 UTC≈3,140 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$90K has already been raised for $APPLE, and the chart is holding support like a champ 👑 That fox mascot is unbelievably memeable—once the “surgery” kicks off, we’ll be streaming every step! If $APPLE makes it through alive, we could potentially hit a $10 million market cap 🤯 👀 Everything will stay transparent and public This project still has plenty of runway ✅ Never sleep on our insider drops—they’re top-tier

7 May 2026, 20:42 UTC≈2,410 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🦠 Our $HENTAI bags are officially in pandemic mode! Viruses are green. Charts are green. Early members portfolio’s are green. From early infection to moonshot — this hentai virus doesn’t stop ✅ $HENTAI Updated ATH Stats below: ⬇️ • $3.5M in volume (past 24 hours) • ATH increase of 884x 🔥 • $1.7M peak market cap • Trending #5 on Dexscreener • Over 1,500 holders CRAZY THAT WE CALLED THIS ONE SPOT ON! 💯 #Return1

7 May 2026, 20:25 UTC≈1,830 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

THE MOST MONUMENTAL SWING SINCE THIS TOKEN DROPPED 19 HOURS AGO! $HENTAI nearly blasted to a $2 million market cap, and now it’s racking up $3.2 million in trading volume—sitting at #5 on DEX leaderboards 🔥 On-chain indicators are red-hot, and there’s serious money on the table 🤑 👀 Keep an eye on established coins, but don’t sleep on momentum narrative driven plays like $HENTAI 👈 Stay locked with the #Return100x

7 May 2026, 20:15 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 ANOTHER NEW ATH—WE’RE BREAKING ALL THE RECORDS! $1 MILLION VALIDATION IS IN THE BOOKS, BABY! 😎 Check out that fat green candle—it’s a full-blown pandemic in our portfolios. If this thing spreads like COVID did, we’re in for stratospheric gains. $HENTAI just leveled up again 🔥 LOCK IN THOSE PROFITS AND DUMP YOUR MOONBAGS! 💰🤑

7 May 2026, 19:15 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🦠 $HENTAI just keeps spreading! If it isn’t one ATH, it’s the next—lol Every pump and bounce just cements this play ✅ $HENTAI Updated ATH Stats below: ⬇️ • $2.1M in volume (past 24 hours) • ATH increase of 351x 🔥 • $700K peak market cap • Trending #9 on Dexscreener • Over 1,500 holders Don’t let the eye-watering charts fool you—what shoots up parabolically can crash just as hard 💯 🚨 The smartest move? Cash out

7 May 2026, 18:59 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🦠 $HENTAI Massive Gains Insider Success Spotlight ✨ One member transformed a $200 ape into more than $19K+ by jumping in early on our $HENTAI token! The key was timing—those who enter right at the drop often experience exponential returns 🤑 On the next call, a major investor plans to ape $10K, and several other large whales are gearing up to follow suit… That level of commitment from big players is an encouraging

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @memewars25. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 400,721 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RETURN OF THE 100X” (@memewars25), 38,884 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/memewars25.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.