Channel
@memedger
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001247747761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @memedger |
| Description | Что хотел сказать автор? |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/memedger |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 6 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 6 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
31 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 41.9% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 35.5% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2023 to 14 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С начала августа случился прорыв чана с вакансиями, еле успеваю на собесы гонять. Намутила чисто аналитический канальчик, там иногда ною про то что получила по жопе на тех интервью за слабые софтскиллы: @scooby_data
❤2
вообще у меня новый прикол с Т-Банком - я им отклик, они мне - отказ. Решила что ради прикола буду откликаться все равно. В чем тут прикол не могу сказать.
❤🔥1
влиться в общество или быть счастливым?
Вот так застеснялся презики в аптеке купить - потом ребятёнка нянчишь
Поднимаю кстати гадкую тему: я заказала О ГОСПОДИ прокладки на озоне и сегодня забирала их в ПВЗ, складываю их в авоську, короче их видно. Сзади меня в очереди стоит бабка и говорит "Девушка вы что так понесете?? Это же НЕПРИЛИЧНО!!!!! Это ГИГИЕНА!! Мужчины смотрят! “ блять что нахуй? Нахуя на этом внимание акцентировать? Ну да, несу прокладки, точно так же могла туалетную бумагу в руке нести или зубную щетку. Че за …
Не нужен, кстати? 🤨
Приготовьтесь, что если мы случайно встретимся, а вы где-то в айтишке трудитесь, я начну изрыгать даунские шутки из разряда 'Вашему отделу аналитик не нужен?' и 'Как это не хотите джуна-аналитика? Джуна все хотят, не придумывайте. Дал бог джуна даст и на онбординг'
❤2
Я приделала комментарии, теперь получается диалог 😁
Btw, вчера мне пришел первый отказ по новому резюме 😣
Пришел пруф что я аналитик! Яндексоиды, узнаете кого-нибудь?))))
🔥1
Поставьте сюда лайкосик какой-нибудь если вам интересно про пункт 6 - обещаю хиханьки и хаханьки в канале
❤4
Пока что неделю в статусе безработного гнома: качаюсь на качелях "я никогда не найду работу и умру от голода - я всегда найду бабки и такого гениального специалиста как оторвут с руками". За время, прошедшее с последнего поста: 1. закончила учебу в Практикуме. Я теперь офишали аналитик данных, пруфы пока не пришли на почту, просто поверьте на слово. 2. Оформляю портфолио в гитхабе как настоящий программист, только н…
❤🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @memedger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Менеджер слабого звена” (@memedger), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/memedger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.