Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MELLSTROY CASINO

Channel

MELLSTROY CASINO

@mellstroyijsk

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

27,189subscribers

-2,869 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002166019908
TypeChannel
Username@mellstroyijsk
DescriptionFan community
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mellstroyijsk

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

34.4 average views per post against 27,189 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.127%. Across the 5,894 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,007–31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.37% and 22.1%, with a median of 11.3%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (3 October 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Posts measured92 of 92 published in the window (92 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled3,169
Mature posts only0.127% over 92 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers27,189 measured 2 November 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 5,894 channels · p10 2.62% · p25 5.37% · p50 11.3% · p75 22.1% · p90 44.7%
Position in cohort0.255th percentile · 1/91 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.106% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 2 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

27,18930,05828,623.57 August 2026 — 30,058 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,058 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,019 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,965 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,921 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,882 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,839 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,786 subscribers15 August 2026 — 29,719 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,685 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,645 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,609 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,566 subscribers21 August 2026 — 29,516 subscribers22 August 2026 — 29,482 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29,424 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,378 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,342 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,300 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,265 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,215 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,196 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,145 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,113 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,084 subscribers3 September 2026 — 29,047 subscribers5 September 2026 — 28,971 subscribers9 September 2026 — 28,876 subscribers11 September 2026 — 28,812 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,755 subscribers14 September 2026 — 28,698 subscribers16 September 2026 — 28,636 subscribers19 September 2026 — 28,565 subscribers26 September 2026 — 28,308 subscribers4 October 2026 — 28,053 subscribers9 October 2026 — 27,899 subscribers13 October 2026 — 27,755 subscribers14 October 2026 — 27,716 subscribers15 October 2026 — 27,683 subscribers16 October 2026 — 27,642 subscribers17 October 2026 — 27,599 subscribers19 October 2026 — 27,554 subscribers20 October 2026 — 27,533 subscribers21 October 2026 — 27,507 subscribers22 October 2026 — 27,472 subscribers23 October 2026 — 27,447 subscribers24 October 2026 — 27,414 subscribers25 October 2026 — 27,388 subscribers26 October 2026 — 27,367 subscribers27 October 2026 — 27,333 subscribers28 October 2026 — 27,296 subscribers29 October 2026 — 27,271 subscribers30 October 2026 — 27,251 subscribers31 October 2026 — 27,243 subscribers1 November 2026 — 27,213 subscribers2 November 2026 — 27,189 subscribers7 August 20262 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 87 days, net -2,869. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,759–30,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 09:1927,189-24
1 Nov 2026, 09:2027,213-30
31 Oct 2026, 12:2027,243-8
30 Oct 2026, 15:5627,251-20
29 Oct 2026, 19:2127,271-25
28 Oct 2026, 21:3527,296-37
27 Oct 2026, 19:2827,333-34
26 Oct 2026, 15:3027,367-21
25 Oct 2026, 16:4627,388-26
24 Oct 2026, 13:5627,414-33
23 Oct 2026, 12:2127,447-25
22 Oct 2026, 14:5427,472-35
21 Oct 2026, 08:1827,507-26
20 Oct 2026, 04:4827,533-21
19 Oct 2026, 01:1127,554-45
17 Oct 2026, 23:2827,599-43
16 Oct 2026, 21:5027,642-41
15 Oct 2026, 19:0827,683-33
14 Oct 2026, 16:4727,716-39
13 Oct 2026, 07:1027,755first reading

Engagement

236 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 139 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.126%
avg views ÷ 27,189 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.3
91 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
91
of 236 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 91 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held236 (3 July 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total3,124
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Nov 2026, 15:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,350
Videos
≈321
Links
≈1,840

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
28m 25s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 45 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤457.1%
❤‍🔥228.6%
👏114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 236 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 236 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Oct 2026, 19:28 UTC66 viewsread 2 November 2026
Video

ХАХАХАХАХАХА, МЕНЯ УЖЕ И В ШКОЛАХ МЕМОМ ДЕЛАЮТ 🌟

22 Oct 2026, 09:06 UTC70 viewsread 2 November 2026
Photo

Сугар рашыч сыпанул 3 лямчика Хз выводить или ещё играть 🍫 Для новых участников сделали промокод на 10.000₽: MELST5 🌟Играю тут - @MellstroyGame

21 Oct 2026, 19:12 UTC54 viewsread 2 November 2026
Photo

Это называется старый плюхнул ⚡️ Думаю поставить на вывод занос 🌟Играю сейчас тут - @MellstroyGame

21 Oct 2026, 12:55 UTC46 viewsread 2 November 2026
Photo

Плюхнул все таки олимпус, я рад На 3 ляма отдался старый дед ⚡️ 🌟Играю тут - @MellstroyGame 🌟Ссылка на сайт - MellstroyGame

20 Oct 2026, 16:26 UTC35 viewsread 2 November 2026
Photo

Ещё поймал занос в баксах 🐶 108к $ это примерно 10 лямов ₽ 🌟Играю тут - MellstroyGame (ссылка)

20 Oct 2026, 12:34 UTC33 viewsread 2 November 2026
Photo

5 лямов с последней бонуски👹 Ещё чуть покручу и вывожу балик 🌟Играю тут - @MellstroyGame

20 Oct 2026, 10:41 UTC32 viewsread 2 November 2026
Video

Ответил на смешной вопрос из чата Про договор с Лукашенко 😂

20 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC34 viewsread 2 November 2026
Photo

Бонанза очень хорошо сыграла 🍬 Занос на жеттоне +2.8 лямов 🌟Играю тут - @MellstroyGame 🌟Ссылка на сайт - MellstroyGame

Showing the 12 most recent of 236 posts we hold for @mellstroyijsk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MELLSTROY CASINO” (@mellstroyijsk), 27,189 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mellstroyijsk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.