«Если тебе плюют в спину, значит, ты сидишь за компом, а сзади стоит заказчик и орет». — Коко Шанель-микшер

Channel
•𝗠𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗱•
@meliodiii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002809099532 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @meliodiii |
| Description | Лс(по вопросам): https://t.me/meliodddd |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/meliodiii |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 8 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 5 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 13
- Videos
- 9
- Links
- 7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 37s
- Average length
- 26s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 11 | 40.7% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 14.8% | |
| ☃ | 3 | 11.1% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 11.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 26 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 5
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @meliodiii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 November 2025 to 26 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️ Наконец-то доделал:) 🎊Тема: Шаришь? 💵Время: 19 часов Blender, Hunyuan3D, Premier Pro + AI ассеты (20штук) в Cascadeur чет не пошло, пришлось по старому в блиндири📱 #рефнедели #jccamp
☃3
⚫️⚪️⚫️⚪️⚪️
🔥2
ещё чуть-чуть📱 📁📁📁
🔥2
Идет новый рефнедели 🤪 Шаблон: камера летит вокруг шара идея: 50-летний мужичок-скуф в шортах-трениках пытается безуспешно достать банку пивандрия из сферы👾 свет и аниматик уже есть + накидал сет звуков
🔥5👍2
Я НЕ ПОКАЖУ СВОИ ⚪️⚫️⚪️⚪️ ⚫️ Убирайте вот это закостенелое, не трендовое, абсолютно консервное мышление - я ни кому ни чего не покажу! Закроюсь и ВСЕ ПОТОМ КАК АХУЕЮТ! Не ахуеют. Во-первых ни кто не узнает, что вы делали что-то, потому что вам стало плевать на проект со временем. Во-вторых когда нужна была помощь, вы ее не получили и обосрались как лохи. Простите, но это правда. Мы с вами не мыши, которые знаем чт…
Неделя 6 #рефнедели На этой неделе мы объединились в команды чтобы прочувствовать эту самую командную работу и сделать что-то интересное вместе Тема: «Событие» (ЧП) Тушёнка закончилась, нам пизда :O В проекте участвовали: @bubsen3d - Тим лид, режиссёр, аниматор, цветокор @kioos1 - Режиссёр, окружение(props), SFX, озвучка @ne31oi - окружение, сборка сцены @meliodddd - SFX, аниматор тушёнки, моделлер @lortremart…
🍌2❤1❤🔥1
почти готово
🔥2
смотрю на крест, но вижу твою заботу
💊1
File, posted without a caption
Вот такой был рефборд Также прикрепил трек который очень повлиял на идейность проекта🌟
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬛️ Тема: «FloorTrip» 👾 Blender ~ 18 часов #рефнедели Сделал старую деревянную комнату-мастерскую, с идейным закосом под стимпанк В процессе несколько раз полностью менял композицию, т.к ни один вариант не устраивал. Перерыв помог: попробовал, как эксперимент, сделать все в eevee и добавить стилизацию под комикс — зернистость и работу с Grease Pencil. Это помогло преодолеть застой. Также сильно вд…
❤2❤🔥2👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @meliodiii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@a_vac_cg · 331 postArtalize | CG&AI
@artalize_lab · 4001 postBondarenko.cg
@bondarenko_cg · 501 postПортфель Бубсеня
@bubsen_masters · 531 postТаков CG путь
@CGodyssey · 501 postEdwardsii - 3D art
@Edwardsii3d · 2111 postfaqumeeny
@faqumeeny · 591 postGuiddonBruh
@GuiddonBruh · 661 postIce или HE Ice? / CGI
@he_iceCG · 51 postMA CG
@HWG_Team · 821 postilywadoma
@ilywadoma_ART · 171 postIzmo CG Creator
@izmo_cg_creator · 31 postJCenterS - Компьютерная графика (CG, 3D, LLM)
@JohnCenterStudio · 6,3951 postkovak.exe
@kovakexe · 571 postLeifu Studio 💼
@Leifu_Studio · 81 postLionar3DArt
@lionar3Dart · 191 postMy links
@MelioddddLinks · 21 postРаскаты грома
@raskattwitt · 1521 postInside BlackHole
@Sh4rhole · 1001 postSheri✨3D artist/3d motion✨
@sheri3dartmotion · 5411 postSame_Pictures
@smpictrs · 1331 postTucih
@tucihh · 2,6581 postникита рендерит сиджи
@UE5Tips · 8821 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@meliodiii named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“•𝗠𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗱•” (@meliodiii), 8 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meliodiii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.