Channel
@melcrtv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
49subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001956813950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @melcrtv |
| Description | Канал про бизнес, упаковку проектов, продюсирование брендов, маркетинговые инструменты и немного личный блог автора или много😁 Автор канала: Ильясов Евгений Маркетолог, основатель студии МЕЛ 🌐 https://melcreative.ru По вопросам 👉@checkevg |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/melcrtv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 49 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 49 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
221 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5424972470023104089 | 83 | 37.6% | |
| custom 5438496463044752972 | 55 | 24.9% | |
| custom 5456140674028019486 | 43 | 19.5% | |
| custom 5427168083074628963 | 40 | 18.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2025 to 10 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, требуется Ваше мнение. Решил я значит публиковать экспертные REELS и снял пилотный ролик, но чет не могу понять, нравится мне или нет, дайте обратную связь, смотрели бы такое? Цепляет?🫣
custom 54249724700231040895custom 54271680830746289633custom 54561406740280194862
Сегодня пост-разбор и яркий пример, как делать не стоит 🚫 Хочу поделиться ситуацией, которая, думаю, знакома многим. Сегодня утром пришло сообщение от некоего литературного агентства Writer’s Way – без моего согласия, просто так, рано утром, когда я еще сладко сплю. Представительница агентства, Елена, написала, что они нашли меня через канал Егора Пырикова и их заинтересовал мой опыт в качестве основателя (какого б…
custom 54384964630447529722custom 54249724700231040891
Надо бы пост какой нибудь полезный написать, но уже завтра🥱 А пока предлагаю вам полюбоваться ночным морем🌊
custom 54249724700231040898custom 54384964630447529725custom 54271680830746289632custom 54561406740280194861
«Мудрость дня» в Международный день чая 🫖 Все, кто меня знает, в курсе: я не просто люблю чай — он по жизни меня сопровождает, как надежный друг и партнер… ⏱ Сегодня, хочу поделиться тремя бизнес-уроками, которые преподал мне этот древний напиток: 1️⃣ Горячий, но не обжигающий Хороший чай заваривается при правильной температуре — слишком горячая вода убивает вкус, а слишком холодная не раскрывает его. Так и в биз…
custom 54249724700231040896custom 54384964630447529725custom 54271680830746289634
Наконец … мы едем в отпуск🏝️ ура … но это больше, чем отпуск
custom 54384964630447529727custom 54249724700231040896custom 54561406740280194861
🕰️ Было время, когда «ХАЙП» называли «ажиотажем»… На фото я с сыном за чтением книги: «Реклама: она пришла, чтобы остаться» показываю ему, что все новое - это переработанное «старое». Листаю коммерческие объявления 1900-х и хохочу: всё то же самое, только слова другие! ➡️Тогда: «Ажиотажный спрос на швейные машинки "Зингер"!» ➡️ Сейчас: «Хайп вокруг новых айфонов — успевай купить!» Что изменилось? Словарь: «феном…
custom 54384964630447529725custom 54561406740280194864custom 54249724700231040893custom 54271680830746289631
Надо бы какой нибудь полезный пост написать, но чет не охото. Пожалуй, завтра сделаю… Доброй ночи 😴 ❤️ Кота нашего зовут Василий, он же Василискус, он же Васко Да Гама
custom 54249724700231040898custom 54271680830746289634custom 54384964630447529724custom 54561406740280194863
В чае ценится глубина вкуса, плотность и аромат, а не скорость его заваривания ☕ В бизнесе — то же самое: не спеши показать результат, вложи душу, дайте идеям настояться… 🧘♂️ Настоящий успех, как элитный улун, раскрывается постепенно ☕ Вся рубрика по хэштегу: #мудростьдня@melcrtv
custom 54249724700231040897custom 54561406740280194865custom 54271680830746289634
‼️ Для тех, кто не читал! Посты можно найти по хэштегу: #мудростьдня@melcrtv
custom 54249724700231040896custom 54271680830746289633custom 54561406740280194862
Соскучились по рубрике «Мудрость дня»? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 54561406740280194865custom 54384964630447529724custom 54271680830746289633
Video, posted without a caption
custom 54249724700231040898custom 54384964630447529727custom 54271680830746289635
😎 Выступил сегодня в качестве приглашенного эксперта в прямом эфире на канале Екатерины Дворниковой Подняли тему: «Почему сайт в формате Telegram MiniApps необходим каждому бизнесу в 2025 году?» Приятного просмотра! Кстати, это был мой дебют, я доволен, больше волновался 😁
custom 54561406740280194866custom 54271680830746289635custom 54384964630447529724custom 54249724700231040893
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @melcrtv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Соскучились по рубрике «Мудрость дня»? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2025 to 10 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Жека МЕЛ | Креативный маркетинг” (@melcrtv), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/melcrtv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.