3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 478–479 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 05:21
479
+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:32
478
no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:29
478
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
189.7%
avg views ÷ 479 subscribers
Avg views / post
909
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
8 (13 October 2025 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
2,726
Reactions total
64
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
115 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
93
80.9%
🕊
13
11.3%
👍
4
3.48%
👏
2
1.74%
😁
2
1.74%
🤩
1
0.87%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌈به نام خداوند رنگین کمان
💫مهریار مفتخر است که توانست با همراهی شما برنامهی دیگری را درتاریخ ۱۲مرداد۱۴۰۵ در موسسه مهرآفرین برگزار کند:
🦷در این برنامه 60کودک و مادر تحت آموزش بهداشت دهان و دندان و غربالگری و فلورایدتراپی قرار گرفتند
🌱از خانمها و آقایان:
ورودی ۱۴۰۱: امین طالبی، علیرضا حسنی، پریا ریاحی، مهسا آرین، هستی روشنمقدم، نوید یوسفی، محمدمهدی حیدری، فاطمه تازیکی
ورودی ۱۴۰۲: نفس موسیزاده و هومن چاوشی
ور…
کانون خیریه مهریار برگزار میکند:
🌱 غربالگری، آموزش بهداشت و ارتقای سلامت
🦷 حیطههای فعالیت:
▫️ آموزش بهداشت دهان و دندان
▫️ فلوراید تراپی
▫️ غربالگری
🕐 زمان: دوشنبه۱۲مرداد ۱۴۰۵، از ساعت ۱۳-۱۶
📍 مکان: میدان شهدا،خیابان هفده شهریور ،مرکز نگهداری از کودکان مهرآفرین
❕سرویس ایاب ذهاب از درب دانشکده
🌐 جهت ثبتنام، از طریق لینک زیر اقدام فرمایید.
💬 جهت کسب اطلاعات بیشتر، به آیدی تلگرام زیر پیام دهید:
➡️ @MehryarAd
رئیس محترم دانشکدهی دندانپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران
جناب آقای دکتر بهمن سراج
با سلام و احترام؛
با توجه به نگرانیهای ایجادشده دربارهی کنارهگیری و استعفای جناب آقای دکتر محمدعلی کشواد، معاونت فرهنگی دانشکده، به علت فشارهای وارده، از حضرتعالی تقاضا داریم ضمن حمایت از ادامهی فعالیت ایشان، تدابیر لازم را برای حفظ این سرمایهی ارزشمند علمی و مدیریتی اتخاذ فرمایید و اجازه ندهید شرایط موجود به توقف همکاری ایشان با…
📍با سلام و احترام خدمت دانشجویان و پژوهشگران عزیز 📍
📌مرکز پژوهشهای دانشجویی DSSRC با همکاری کانون خیریه مهریار و دانشکده دندانپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران برگزار میکند :
🔹 کارگاه آموزش رفرنسنویسی با نرمافزار EndNote 2025 🔹
(ویژه دانشجویان – در بستر اسکایروم)
🧠 در این کارگاه، شرکتکنندگان بهصورت کاربردی با اصول مدیریت منابع علمی، رفرنسنویسی استاندارد و استفاده حرفهای از نرمافزار EndNote 2021 در نگارش …
کانون خیریه مهریار و کانون جهادی حرکت با همکاری "معاونت فرهنگی و دانشجویی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران"، "مرکز بهداشت جنوب" و "داروخانه جهادی" برگزار می نمایند:
🌱 غربالگری، آموزش و ارجاع دانش آموزان به مناسبت بازگشایی مدارس
🦷 حیطههای فعالیت کانون خیریه مهریار:
▫️آموزش بهداشت
▫️فلوراید تراپی
◽️غربالگری
🕐 زمان: جمعه، ۹ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۴
۸صبح الی ۱۴
📍مکان: مدرسه ای واقع در منطقه ۱۹ شهر تهران
❕امکان استفاده از سرویس ایاب …
به نام خداوند رنگین کمان
#کانون_خیریه_مهریار
#انجمن_اسلامی_دانشجویان
💫مهریار و انجمن اسلامی دانشجویان مفتخرند که توانستند با همراهی شما برنامهی دیگری را در تاریخ ۲۴مهر۱۴۰۴ در موسسه کاهش آسيب نور سپید هدایت برگزار کند
.
🦷در این برنامه ۳۰مادر سرپرست خانوار و ۶۰ کودک کار تحت آموزش بهداشت دهان و دندان و درمان فلورایدتراپی قرار گرفتند
🌱از خانمها و آقایان:
[ورودی ۴٠۳]ترانه متولیان،هلیا سیدی،بهنیا بذرافشان،پارسا سپندار،…
بهنامخداوندرنگینکمان🌈
✨به همت اعضای کانون خیریه مهریار و کمک شما مهریاریان ، ۴۰ بسته لوازمالتحریر اعم از (دفتر نقاشی، دفتر خطدار، مدادرنگی، تراش و پاککن، جامدادی و …) و لباس فرم برای کودکان نیازمند تهیه و آماده شد.
باور داریم که هر مداد میتواند رویایی را بنویسد و هر دفتر، شروعی برای آیندهای روشن باشد.🌻✨
@mehryarcharity✨
🌷به نام پروردگار مهر🌷
#انجمن_اسلامی_دانشجویان
#کانون_خیریه_مهریار
#فراخوان
🦷 انجمن اسلامی دانشکده دندانپزشکی و کانون خیریهی مهریار قصد دارند با کمک دانشجویان ورودی ۱۴۰۱ تا ۱۴۰۳ (کمک درمانگر و آموزش بهداشت و فلوراید تراپی ) و دانشجویان ورودی ۱۴۰۰ و ۹۹ (غربالگری) قدم کوچکی در راه بهبود سلامت دهان و دندان کودکان بردارند.
به همین منظور، از همهی افراد علاقهمند دعوت میکنیم تا همراه و حامی ما باشند.
🗓 این برنامه در …
🕊4❤2🤩1
Signed asmahmti
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @mehryarcharity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,088,494 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كانون خیریه مهریار” (@mehryarcharity), 479 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mehryarcharity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
