Read our whitepaper on Purified Intelligence, our vision for the future of AI Inference: https://x.com/yilongl_megaeth/status/2120199909152580040 Access Purified Intelligence on MEGA’s new product in December.
👏16❤6

Channel
@megaeth_labs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,198subscribers
-834 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002219190605 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @megaeth_labs |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/megaeth_labs |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 17:17 | 8,198 | -21 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:08 | 8,219 | -27 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:37 | 8,246 | -22 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:34 | 8,268 | -19 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:40 | 8,287 | -43 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:41 | 8,330 | -10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:28 | 8,340 | -26 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:05 | 8,366 | -12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:54 | 8,378 | -39 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 08:16 | 8,417 | -52 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 10:57 | 8,469 | -92 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:35 | 8,561 | -69 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 8,630 | -49 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 8,679 | -22 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 8,701 | -26 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:14 | 8,727 | -46 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 8,773 | -26 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 8,799 | -32 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 8,831 | -38 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:09 | 8,869 | first reading |
42 posts held, back to 15 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 42 (15 April 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 9,582 |
| Reactions total | 202 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
961 reactions across 42 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 441 | 45.9% | |
| ❤ | 362 | 37.7% | |
| 👍 | 54 | 5.62% | |
| 👎 | 43 | 4.47% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 2.08% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 1.46% | |
| 💩 | 13 | 1.35% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 1.14% | |
| 😴 | 3 | 0.312% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 961 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Read our whitepaper on Purified Intelligence, our vision for the future of AI Inference: https://x.com/yilongl_megaeth/status/2120199909152580040 Access Purified Intelligence on MEGA’s new product in December.
👏16❤6
Today, MEGA commits $30m to build new products on the MegaETH blockchain. Starting with a globally competitive AI Inference market launching in December. MEGA has no equity owners. It is aligned with $MEGA. Full announcement: https://x.com/megaeth/status/2120185003716092188 Website: https://mega.holdings/
🔥22❤9
The MegaETH Foundation becomes MEGA. More to come in 2 hours. Thread: https://x.com/megaeth/status/2120155220261188016
❤13🔥4
In 24 hours. https://x.com/megaeth/status/2119822979521778114
🔥11👎2
Our 7-day zkLogin key ceremony is complete, and MOSS zkLogin will be live soon! Thanks to everyone who contributed to the setup. https://x.com/megaeth/status/2118350724585369937?s=20
❤13🔥4
Final call: zkLogin Key Ceremony If you haven’t contributed yet, now’s the time! Your independent contribution helps strengthen the setup’s security by ensuring it doesn’t depend on trusting Mega alone. Ceremony ends Nov 4th at 11:59 PM EST (Ethereum block 26,346,911). https://x.com/megaeth/status/2117258957706408038?s=20
❤8🔥4
MegaETH October Recap! • Fast, self-custodial social login is coming to MOSS - we optimized zkLogin proofs to run ~13× faster than any other EVM. • MNX launched, letting you trade the AI economy.. • Pump.fun now supports MegaETH, a new venue to trade ecosystem tokens. • Euphoria added BTC tap trading and Trade Replays for sharing your best trades. • Brix brought wiTRY to Stablewatch, where you can track its yield an…
🔥18❤5
Under the hood of zkLogin Our teammate Artemis shares the story of an internal competition that made zkLogin for EVM 13x faster, making private, self-custodial onboarding more practical at scale. https://x.com/megaeth/status/2115471920133214615?a=YpFsKhbQA6F9GxHzcKY&s=20
❤10
We took on zkLogin's biggest bottleneck: slow, costly proofs. Our newly optimized prover does it in ~0.13s, nearly 13× faster than Sui's current one. A major step for self-custodial EVM login, but the setup shouldn’t rely on us alone. https://x.com/megaeth/status/2115430738334302557
❤12👍5
MegaETH has a soft spot for teams that refuse to accept the usual tradeoffs. Espresso's latest benchmark pairs enormous throughput with sub-second finality. No small feat. Something's brewing… https://x.com/megaeth/status/2112930930004541834?s=46&t=2B-ZwjlE1OMM9P-Zd7BqCQ
🔥17❤4
MNX is now live on MegaETH. Trade futures on pre-IPO companies, Frontier Lab revenue projections, SF housing, Employment rates — with no funding fees. MNX also offers perps on stocks, metals and other RWAs with more coming soon. If you have an opinion on AI, there will be a market for it on MNX. Trade the Takeoff: https://x.com/MNX_fi/status/2110049233441378738?s=20
🔥12❤7
Emerging market yield, onchain with Brix The Turkish lira carry trade returned ~25% net in USD last year. Brix now brings this market onchain. You can access wiTRY on Stablewatch today, showing: → ~14.9% 30d APY → $181K+ yield paid out over the last 30 days DeFi capital can now directly reach an asset powering the world's fastest-growing economies. https://x.com/megaeth/status/2107841388092211484?s=20
❤15🔥8
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @megaeth_labs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MegaETH MegaPhone 📣” (@megaeth_labs), 8,198 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/megaeth_labs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.