Channel
@mega_pump_group
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,335subscribers
-2,340 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001297239210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mega_pump_group |
| Description | Cryptocurrency's #1 and biggest signal group! @Johncarasca All signals are free! We will never ask for money in exchange for any premium services. #DYOR. None of our signals are financial advice. Trade our signals at your own risk as they can be risky! |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mega_pump_group |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 11:08 | 31,335 | -109 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 00:30 | 31,444 | -104 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:45 | 31,548 | -34 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:06 | 31,582 | -25 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:01 | 31,607 | -53 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:08 | 31,660 | -47 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:46 | 31,707 | -43 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:31 | 31,750 | -54 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:55 | 31,804 | -32 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:00 | 31,836 | -32 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:48 | 31,868 | -34 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:48 | 31,902 | -50 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 31,952 | -68 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:11 | 32,020 | -111 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:58 | 32,131 | -139 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:30 | 32,270 | -166 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:27 | 32,436 | -159 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:28 | 32,595 | -120 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 32,715 | -167 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:28 | 32,882 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 23 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 172 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (23 August 2025 – 25 October 2026) |
| Views total | 43,300 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 10:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Let's go higher. $LIGHT Getting thousands of messages of people asking when the next signal will be. The next signal will be when we are done pushing $LIGHT. Our team and group is currently heavily focused on it. Every coin we post in our channels will be supported and focused on until we make massive profits on them. Our current profit on light stands at 80% from our entry (up to 800% if you used x10 leverage ) b…
This is the power of our group. Massive profits on $LIGHT for those who held strong with us, we are still holding and pushing. As we said, holders will get rewarded.
Photo, posted without a caption
$LIGHT is still having some nice movements , up 40% in 1 day from it's recent bottom after the market crash and still up nicely from our entry. We strongly suggest that you keep trading this coin, it can potentially pump x2-x3 in the short term. We will keep focusing on $LIGHT until we make massive profits on it before moving on to our next signal. Also, make sure to join our new telegram channel , all our big buy …
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
$LIGHT went up 10% after our signal so far ( up to 100% profit if you used x10 leverage ) , it is still in accumulation zone currently and we will make a massive move on it soon.
$LIGHT is still holding up strong despite the market crashing , currently it is up a few % above our entry , holders will be rewarded.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Buying $LIGHT here, it will pump massively soon.
Photo, posted without a caption
We will be posting the futures buy signal in about 30 minutes.
The market is strong and we believe altcoins will keep pumping in the upcoming weeks. It is time. We will be posting a futures buy signal within the next 2 hours, stay tuned.
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @mega_pump_group. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mega Signals Group” (@mega_pump_group), 31,335 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mega_pump_group.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.