Channel
@mega_pump_group
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,475subscribers
-200 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001297239210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mega_pump_group |
| Description | Cryptocurrency's #1 and biggest signal group! @Johncarasca All signals are free! We will never ask for money in exchange for any premium services. #DYOR. None of our signals are financial advice. Trade our signals at your own risk as they can be risky! |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mega_pump_group |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 33,475 | -23 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 33,498 | -34 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 33,532 | -36 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 33,568 | -37 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 33,605 | -28 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 33,633 | -25 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:50 | 33,658 | -17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 33,675 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Hello everyone, in the past, we have always done massive successful pumps on centralized exchanges and helped our members generate millions of $ in profits over the years. Back in 2021 we posted a Dex coin that went up around 50x from 4m marketcap to 200m after our post and we will try to replicate something like that again for everyone. As of today, we are officially announcing that we are going to disrupt the meme…
The market is looking really good for altcoins, our next big signal will be in the upcoming days.
Hello everyone, make sure to join our new telegram for the next buy signal and be part of our upcoming plans that will make our members massive amounts of profits : https://t.me/megasignalscrypto
Quick profits for anyone that bought instantly after our signal , specially those who used leverage ( Up to 150% profit on 10x leverage ). Good level to rebuy here for those who missed the pump
Buying #DEXE here, massive pump incoming
Photo, posted without a caption
Some altcoins are looking good to buy right now. We will be posting one today that is guaranteed to pump at least x2 from it's current price within the next few weeks.
Hello everyone, we have found a really good coin that we will be supporting in the upcoming months and that has a high chance of making us massive amounts of profits. It will be posted within the next few days, stay tuned.
Longing #ETH here with massive size and x5 leverage.
🛎 Pump Signal Announcement!🛎 Date : To be determined Time : 16:00 pm GMT Exchange : On chain ( solana ) Hello everyone, in the past, we have always done massive successful pumps on centralized exchanges and helped our members generate millions of $ in profits over the years. Back in 2021 we posted a Dex coin that went up around 50x from 4m marketcap to 200m after our post and we will try to replicate something like …
Hello everyone, we are in the process of consolidating all our members into 1 group and we might start doing massive pumps again like we used to in the past, stay tuned. https://t.me/megasignalscrypto
Reminds me of when we used to do pumps this big on Binance. Should we start pumping again?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mega_pump_group. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 717,932 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mega Signals Group” (@mega_pump_group), 33,475 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mega_pump_group.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.