Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Medsira🫀🩺

Channel

Medsira🫀🩺

@medsira

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,959subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001653590032
TypeChannel
Username@medsira
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 September 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/medsira

Growth

2,9592,9752,9673 September 2026 — 2,974 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,975 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,971 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,967 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,959 subscribers3 September 202617 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 14 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,957–2,977 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 20:192,959-8
13 Sept 2026, 23:572,967-4
10 Sept 2026, 05:552,971-4
4 Sept 2026, 20:362,975+1
3 Sept 2026, 22:222,974first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.95%
avg views ÷ 2,959 subscribers
Avg views / post
235
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total4,702
Reactions total79
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 22:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7291.1%
💯67.59%
😭11.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC218 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026

بصح ديروا فبالكم بلي البروغرام تاع السرفيس يتبدل من بوزيسيون لبوزيسيون و من عام لعام يعني قادر تخيروا سرفيس ع أساس فيد تلقاوه رجع شارجي

10

28 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC219 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

نعم 🫠 تقريييبا كاينة فكل سرفيس

28 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC223 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

umc مليحة فأي بوزيسيون صاحتلك 💯

2

28 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC211 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

شخصيا جينيكو مانحبهاش من عند ربي جربي اسطاجي فيها و شوفي اذا مازالك تحبيها ديريها هي سنوات الريزيدانا تعب بزاااف بصح تبان مليحة فالبريفي

1

28 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC218 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

من رأيي orl باسكو فيسيرال بوزوران ع حسب وش نعرف في عامنا خدموا تقريبا كل يوم و ليغارد شاك 9 لكن orl سيستام دوغارد برك

3

28 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC190 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

اتبالي تبدلت بين ليبوزيسيون ، كاين لي خدموا حتى 12 و كاين لي حكموهم يخدموا حتى 4 المهم مافيهاش ليغارد

4

28 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC194 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

umc p2 هيه نورمالمون تبقالك عادي بصح جينيكو فاللخر والله مانكذب عليك اذا مادرتيهاش p4 ديريها p3 و كملي بالبيدياتري وشوفي وش يبقالك فسرفيس شيغيغجيكال أخف واحد فيدي بيه (ايفيتي فيسيرال ، نوروشير ، طروماطو)

4

28 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC248 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

Ped B تابع + نسيت نقول فيها 3 غارد فقط

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @medsira. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

صوتيات تدبر وتجويد معلمات احفظ معنا المجانية
@Quran_VO · 34,240
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Medsira🫀🩺” (@medsira), 2,959 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medsira.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.