Channel
@meds0l65
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,640subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002008608263 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @meds0l65 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/meds0l65 |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:02 | 4,640 | +7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 4,633 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 4,632 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:44 | 4,626 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 4,628 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 4,628 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,099 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Multipare 38 ans, IMC 38, DT2. 36 SA. HTA 145/92 apparue à 35 SA. Pas de protéinurie. CPK normale, plaquettes 180 000, créa 70. Échographie fœtale normale. Q1 : Selon la définition 2026, a-t-elle une prééclampsie ? A. Non, car pas de protéinurie B. Oui, HTA + facteur de risque maternel constitutionnel = dysfonction maternelle C. Non, il faut attendre ≥160/110 Q2 : Dans le phénotype tardif, quel est le facteur décl…
Femme de 27 ans, UDIV, consulte pour sueurs nocturnes profuses depuis 1 semaine, fatigue, et splénomégalie à l’examen. Pas de fièvre. NFS : GB 1800/mm³, lymphocytes 900/mm³. 8% de lymphocytes atypiques. Scanner : adénopathies axillaires + splénomégalie. PET-Scanner : adénopathies hypermétaboliques. On suspecte un lymphome. Rapport sexuel à risque il y a 9 jours. Résultats : VIH 4ème génération : Négatif PCR ARN VIH …
Primigeste 28 ans, 29 SA. HTA 160/100, protéinurie 2g/24h, RCIU <3e percentile. Doppler : IP des artères utérines ↑. Biologie : sFlt-1/PlGF = 150. Q1 : Quel est le mécanisme principal expliquant le RCIU dans ce phénotype précoce ? A. Hyperperfusion placentaire avec œdème villeux B. Remodelage incomplet des artères spiralées → hypoperfusion chronique C. Thrombophilie maternelle avec thrombose des villosités Q2 : Qu…
Posted without readable text
🩺 Cétoacidose diabétique : mise au point de la prise en charge aux urgences Revue de la prise en charge clinique experte dans _Annals of Emergency Medicine_. Ce n’est pas une nouvelle recommandation : c’est une synthèse pratique de ce que disent l’ADA, Diabetes Canada et la Joint British Diabetes Society, avec les points où on se trompe le plus. 🔎 Le fait marquant Un patient sur trois ayant fait une CAD aura un ép…
*🔎 الحقيقة الأساسية* واحد من كل ثلاثة مرضى مصابين بالحماض الكيتوني سيتعرض لنوبة متكررة، معظمها خلال أسبوعين من الخروج. عبء المرض يتركز في مجموعة صغيرة عالية الخطورة — حيث تلعب المحددات الاجتماعية دورًا مثل الإدارة الحادة. *⚠️ الأخطاء التشخيصية الشائعة* ليس كل المرضى لديهم pH منخفض. اضطرابات الحمض-القاعدة المختلطة موجودة في حوالي ثلث الحالات: التقيؤ يسبب قلاءً استقلابيًا، أو تنفس كوسمول يسبب قلاءً تنفسيًا. التمسك بتع…
🧠 Méningites : Rendement d’un algorithme diagnostique étagé en contexte à ressources limitées Étude prospective à l’Hôpital Nacional Dos de Mayo, Lima – 103 adultes suspects Résumé clé de l’étude 1. Principe : 3 niveaux avec règles d’arrêt. Dès qu’un test est positif → on traite et on arrête. Niveau 1 : Biochimie LCR, Gram, encre de Chine, BAAR, cultures, ADA Niveau 2 : Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra + CrAg test rap…
J3 du post-partum. Accouchement normal à 39 SA sans HTA. Céphalées + HTA 155/100 + protéinurie 1g/24h. Créatinine 90. Q1 : Le mécanisme le plus probable est : A. Nouvelle maladie hypertensive B. Dysfonction endothéliale et angiogénique résiduelle du placenta C. Glomérulonéphrite aiguë Q2 : Le rapport sFlt-1/PlGF est-il utile ici ? A. Oui, validé spécifiquement pour le post-partum B. Données limitées, mais peut ai…
Homme de 42 ans, consulte pour épigastralgies chroniques depuis 8 mois. ATCD : Ulcère duodénal traité il y a 3 ans par "trithérapie classique" dont il ne se souvient plus. Allergie à la pénicilline : urticaire. Tabagisme 10 PA. FOGD : Bulbite érythémateuse. Biopsies : _H. pylori_ positif. Test de résistance non disponible. Traitement empirique par BQT pendant 14j bien pris. Contrôle 6 semaines après : Test respiratoi…
Mme D., 58 ans, ATCD : Cancer du poumon non à petites cellules stade IV métastatique osseux et hépatique. Traitement : Carboplatine + Paclitaxel + Pembrolizumab. Dernière cure J-18. J0 - Arrivée aux urgences 14h Motif : Dyspnée d’aggravation rapide + œdème du visage depuis 48h + fièvre 38.9°C depuis ce matin. Examen clinique : - TA 95/60, FC 118, FR 28, SpO2 91% AA - Œdème cervico-facial ++, turgescence des jugulai…
Femme 45 ans, sepsis abdominal post-op. J1 : Créat 220 µmol/L, KDIGO 2, hyperkaliémie 5.8 mmol/L, acidose pH 7.28. Test furosémide : 1.5mg/kg IV car avait déjà eu du furosémide. Question 1 : Résultat : 150 mL en 2h. Comment classer la patiente ? Question 2 : L’interne propose de poser un KT de dialyse "car le test est positif". Êtes-vous d’accord ? Pourquoi ? Question 3 : Évolution J2 : diurèse 1mL/kg/h, K 4.9, p…
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaAHlVCBPzjYuEf9mK2O
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @meds0l65. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Med.solution🩺🩸🧬” (@meds0l65), 4,640 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meds0l65.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.