10 measurements spanning 8 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,274–13,299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 23:53
13,288
+8
13 Aug 2026, 12:19
13,280
-2
12 Aug 2026, 09:32
13,282
-14
11 Aug 2026, 06:01
13,296
+3
10 Aug 2026, 07:06
13,293
+5
9 Aug 2026, 05:53
13,288
+8
8 Aug 2026, 03:01
13,280
+3
6 Aug 2026, 23:29
13,277
-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:00
13,278
no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:56
13,278
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 12 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.3%
avg views ÷ 13,288 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,630
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.301%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
22 (12 June 2025 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
14,500
Reactions total
37
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
340 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
284
83.5%
👍
28
8.24%
🙏
13
3.82%
👌
12
3.53%
🔥
2
0.588%
👏
1
0.294%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 340reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2025 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❓❓ چه تخصصی رو انتخاب کنیم؟ 🧐
🔺مصاحبه با رزیدنت های رشته های مختلف دستیاری برای انتخاب بهتر.
🧬 رشته پوست
🧬رشته پوست ۲ جدید🔺
🧬 رشته چشم پزشکی ۱
🧬 رشته چشم پزشکی ۲
🧬 رشته رادیولوژی ۱
🧬 رشته رادیولوژی ۲
🧬رشته طب فیزیکی جدید 🔺
🧬 رشته طب فیزیکی ۲
🧬 رشته نورولوژی
🧬 رشته قلب ۱
🧬 رشته قلب ۲
🧬پزشکی ورزشی جدید 🔺
🧬 رشته رادیوانکولوژی
🧬 رشته ارتوپدی
🧬 رشته پزشکی هسته ای
🧬 رشته ENT 1
🧬 رشته ENT 2
🧬 رشته پاتولوژی ۱…
🔺سلام خدمت دوستان عزیز
با توجه به نزدیک بودن زمان انتخاب رشته دستیاری، از همین امروز میتونید برای رزرو مشاوره خصوصی تلفنی انتخاب رشته با دکتر محمدرضا رفیعی، به آیدی زیر پیام بدید.
@Dr_tabatabaie_admin
@medpodcast
دوستان عزیز خسته آزمون دستیاری نباشید
امیدوارم تو آزمون سربلند بوده باشید
اونایی هم که بهر دلیل نتونستن که به چیزی که میخوان برسن، غم شون نباشه
ایشا... با برنامه ریزی دقیق تر و تلاش بیشتر نتیجه ای که لایق شون هست رو میگیرن
🔺هر کس که آزمون رو خوب داده و فکر میکنم با بررسی های اولیه میتونه نمره بالای ۴۸۰ بیاره، بمن پیام بده
با دو هدف:
یکی تحلیل آزمون
یکی در صورت تمایل همکاری برای تدریس و مشاوره
@seyedmrrt
@medpodc…
🔺توصیه های آزمون:
🔹ترتیب سوالات آزمون را برای خود تغییر ندهید
🔹با دیدن سختی زیاد در درس نقطه قوت خود، روحیه رو نبازید. چه بسا نقطه ضعف شما آسون باشه
🔹وقتی برای چک دوباره برگشتید به سوالات، فقط سوالاتی رو که فالت بزرگ و فهم اشتباه داشته اید را گزینه تغییر دهید نه اینکه با دلایل مبهم گزینه را تغییر دهید
🔹امشب قرص هایی که شب های قبل نخوردید را نخورید
🔹حواستون به تایم باشه. به سوال ۱۰۰ رسیدید نباید بیش از نصف تایم ر…
🔺راهنمای نکات ضروری یک ماه مانده به آزمون دستیاری
🔹همه چی حذف... تمرکز مستقیم به هدف باشه
🔹از حاشیه و مجازی فاصله بگیرید
🔺دکتر محمدرضا رفیعی طباطبایی
متخصص پوست و مو
۵ درصد برتر بورد تخصصی درماتولوژی
عضو بنیاد ملی نخبگان
🔺با وجودیکه فعالیت آموزشی مون کم شده ولی نکات مشاوره ای رو در خدمت هستیم و فراموش تون نکردیم...
🔺تا آزمون دستیاری و بعدش با ما همراه باشید
@medpodcast
@seyyedmrrt
🔺طبق اخبار رسیده احتمال زیاد امروز نتایج نهایی آزمون دستیاری اعلام خواهد شد.
🔺در صورت تمایل رتبه و قبولی خود رو به آیدی زیر ارسال کنید تا جهت راهنمایی دوستان شما در آزمون های آینده استفاده بشه
اطلاعات شما محرمانه خواهد بود.
@seyedmrrt
@medpodcast
🔺آخرین ویس مشاوره انتخاب رشته
این ویس صرفا برای کمک به داوطلبان انتخاب رشته دستیاری گذاشته شده و قصد توهین به شخص یا رشته وجود نداشته
با دقت گوش بدید تا خدایی نکرده بعدا پشیمون نشید...
#دکتر_رفیعی
#انتخاب_رشته_پارت ۷
🔺رزرو مشاوره تخصصی انتخاب رشته:
@dr_mrt_dermatologist
@medpodcast
🔺دو اشتباه خطرناک و عجیب مشاوران انتخاب رشته که به داوطلبان منتقل شده !!
#انتخاب_رشته_پارت ۶
🔹مشاوره انتخاب رشته خصوصی:
@Dr_mrt_dermatologist
@medpodcast
سلام دوستان
انتخاب رشته از تاریخ ۱۰ تیر تا ۱۵ تیر تمدید شده است.
🔺اگر هنوز ابهامی در تصمیم خود دارید، میتوانید با پیام به آیدی زیر اقدام فرمایید:
@dr_mrt_dermatologist
@medpodcast
🔸اولویت های احتمالی انتخاب رشته دستیاری ۱۴۰۴ به ترتیب محبوب ترین ها
🔹پوست
🔹رادیولوژی
🔹چشم
🔹گوش و حلق و بینی
🔹طب فیزیکی
🔹قلب
🔹نورولوژی
🔹ارتوپدی
🔹پاتولوژی
🔹پزشکی هسته ای
🔹رادیوانکولوژی
🔹نوروسرجری
🔹اورولوژی
🔹پزشکی ورزشی
🔹جراحی
🔹زنان
🔹روانپزشکی
🔹داخلی
🔹اطفال
🔹بیهوشی
🔹طب اورژانس
🔹عفونی
🔹پزشکی قانونی
🔹طب کار
🔹پزشکی اجتماعی
🔺رزرو مشاوره تخصصی انتخاب رشته :
@dr_mrt_dermatologist
#دکتر_رفیعی
@medpodcast
🔺تخمین حداکثر رتبه قبولی رشته های مختلف برای سال ۱۴۰۴ . عدد اول شهر تهران و عدد دوم کل کشور و عدد سوم محروم:
#تخمین
🔹پوست ... ۸۰ و ۱۷۰ و ۶۰۰
🔹رادیولوژی ... ۹۰ و ۴۵۰ و ۸۰۰
🔹چشم ... ۱۵۰ و ۴۵۰ و ۷۰۰
🔹گوش و حلق ... ۱۸۰ و ۵۰۰ و ۹۰۰
🔹طب فیزیکی ... ۲۵۰ و ۴۵۰ و ؟؟
🔹طب هسته ای ... ۶۰۰ و ۱۰۰۰ و ؟؟
🔹قلب ... ۷۵۰ و ۱۷۰۰ و ۲۵۰۰
🔹نورولوژی ... ۶۵۰ و ۱۴۰۰ و ۲۴۰۰
🔹رادیوانکولوژی ... ۹۰۰ و ۱۸۰۰ و ؟؟
🔹پاتولوژی ... ۸۰۰ و ۱۶۰۰ و ۲۴۰۰
🔹ار…
❤20🙏5👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @medpodcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 179,108 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@medpodcast named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dr_mrt_dermatologist named in 67 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
@seyyedmrrt named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Medpodcast” (@medpodcast), 13,288 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medpodcast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.