Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for General Surgery Resources | Medicine.ac

Channel

General Surgery Resources | Medicine.ac

@medicine_generalsurgery

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003877039063
TypeChannel
Username@medicine_generalsurgery
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 22 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/medicine_generalsurgery

Growth

192019.56 August 2026 — 19 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:3820+1
11 Aug 2026, 16:4719no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:3219first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
215.0%
avg views ÷ 20 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.0
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 March 202611 August 2026)
Views total215
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC24 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Reconstruction using which of the following flaps is most appropriate in this patient?

  1. Estlander0%
  2. Facial artery myomucosal0%
  3. Karapandzic0%
  4. Melolabial0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC23 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🪡 Clinical Case Challenge 📚 Source: Prometric — Plastic Surgery MCQs 📝 A 72-year-old man undergoes wide local excision of a squamous cell carcinoma of the lower lip. Margins are free of involvement. A photograph of the resulting defect is shown. Reconstruction using which of the following flaps is most appropriate in this patient? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎓 Medicine Hub — 465,000+ board questions with full explanations,

10 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC72 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

What is the most likely diagnosis?

  1. Astroblastoma0%
  2. Ependymoma0%
  3. Hemangioblastoma67%
  4. Medulloblastoma33%
  5. Neuroblastoma0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC72 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🪡 Clinical Case Challenge 📚 Source: Prometric — Neurosurgery MCQs 📝 The photomicrograph shown in this image demon­ strates the microscopic appearance of a posterior fossa mass in a 6­year­old patient. What is the most likely diagnosis? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎓 Medicine Hub — 465,000+ board questions with full explanations, images and analytics. 🌐 hub.medicine.ac • #Quiz #GeneralSurgery_Quiz

25 Jul 2026, 22:01 UTC24 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🪡 The Osler Thoracic Surgery Subscription-Based Oral Review (Certifying Exam) 📝 Course Overview: The Osler Thoracic Surgery Subscription-Based Oral Review (Certifying Exam) is designed for: Thoracic Surgeons: Professionals preparing for the American Board of Thoracic Surgery (ABTS) or the American Osteopathic Board of Surgery (AOBS) certifying exams. Surgical Residents and Fellows: Trainees seeking to enhance... 💙

8 Jul 2026, 22:00 UTC33 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🪡 Amboss Shelf Surgery QBank 2025 📝 Course Overview: Amboss Shelf Surgery QBank 2025 Discover the next-generation online learning system designed for medical students preparing for the Surgery Shelf Exam 2025. Works flawlessly on any device with complete online capability. macOS, iPhone and iPad users just open it in... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #Qbank #AMBOSS #Surgery 👇 Tap the buttons below to explore:

1 Jul 2026, 22:00 UTC38 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🪡 Prometric Cardiothoracic Surgery QBank 2025 📝 Course Overview: One-Time Payment. Lifetime Access. Instant Online Access. Prometric Cardiothoracic Surgery QBank 2025 The Prometric Cardiothoracic Surgery QBank 2025 is a structured exam-style question package designed to strengthen clinical reasoning, improve accuracy, and build speed in a Prometric-like testing environment. This... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #Prom

11 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC45 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🪡 The Aesthetic Society — The Business of Launching Your Practice 2025 📝 Course Overview: THE AESTHETIC SOCIETY • SEPTEMBER 13-14, 2025 • VIRTUAL SYMPOSIUM The Aesthetic Society — The Business of Launching Your Practice 2025 The Aesthetic Society — The Business of Launching Your Practice 2025 — A practical, step-by-step program on starting and... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #Board #Dermatology #Plastic_Surgery #Sur

8 Jun 2026, 22:00 UTC36 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🪡 NBME - Surgery Self-Assessment - Form 7 (Offline for Windows & Android) 📝 Course Overview: One-Time Payment. Lifetime Access. Fully Offline.NBME - Surgery Self-Assessment - Form 7 (Offline for Windows & Android)This NBME Self-Assessment runs fully offline on Windows & Android using the Medicine Academy proprietary Quiz Engine. Delivered via Google Drive with lifetime, unlimited... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #NBM

3 Jun 2026, 22:00 UTC37 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🪡 CanadaQBank – Qbank For RCSFE 2025 (Offline for Windows & Android) 📝 Course Overview: CanadaQBank – QBank for the RCSFE 2025 – Offline (Windows & Android) A complete and exam-focused RCSFE (Royal College Surgical Foundations Exam) 2025 QBank designed for Canadian surgical residents and IMGs. Includes high-yield basic science, surgical fundamentals, anatomy, critical care,... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #Qbank #Ca

2 Jun 2026, 22:00 UTC29 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🪡 Amboss QBank - EOR - Surgery 2025 (Offline for Windows & Android) 📝 Course Overview: AMBOSS QBank – EOR – Surgery 2025 (Offline for Windows & Android) AMBOSS QBank – EOR – Surgery 2025 is a focused End-of-Rotation surgical question bank designed to strengthen perioperative decision-making, diagnosis, and management across core surgical domains. This offline... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #AMBOSS #Qbank #Surgery

29 May 2026, 22:00 UTC27 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🪡 Amboss QBank - EOR - Surgery 2025 (Offline for Windows & Android) 📝 Course Overview: AMBOSS QBank – EOR – Surgery 2025 (Offline for Windows & Android) AMBOSS QBank – EOR – Surgery 2025 is a focused End-of-Rotation surgical question bank designed to strengthen perioperative decision-making, diagnosis, and management across core surgical domains. This offline... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #AMBOSS #Qbank #Surgery

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @medicine_generalsurgery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz1 voter

Reconstruction using which of the following flaps is most appropriate in this patient?

  1. Estlander0%
  2. Facial artery myomucosal0%
  3. Karapandzic0%
  4. Melolabial0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz3 voters

What is the most likely diagnosis?

  1. Astroblastoma0%
  2. Ependymoma0%
  3. Hemangioblastoma67%
  4. Medulloblastoma33%
  5. Neuroblastoma0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,145,664 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“General Surgery Resources | Medicine.ac” (@medicine_generalsurgery), 20 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medicine_generalsurgery.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.