⚕️ ACP Hospital Med 100 📝 Course Overview: ACP Hospital Med 100 (2025): State-of-the-Art Inpatient Mastery The definitive 100-hour library from the Internal Medicine Meeting 2025. Offering healthcare that’s as unique as your practice, these recordings cover the full spectrum of hospital med, critical care, and perioperative excellence.... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #ACP #Hospital_Medicine #Internal_Medicine 👇 Tap…

Channel
Internal Medicine Resources | Medicine.ac
@medicine_IM
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
62subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003885652431 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @medicine_IM |
| Description | ⚕️ Master Internal Medicine | Medicine Academy 🎥 Premium Internal Medicine Videos & Books 🛒 Explore Courses: medicine.ac/product-category/internal-medicine 📱 Main Hub: @medicine_Academy 💬 WhatsApp: +44 7403 663465 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 20 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/medicine_IM |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 62 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:51 | 62 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 127.8%
- avg views ÷ 62 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 79.3
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 634 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 97
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
What is the critical path?
- 90%
- 140%
- 210%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚕️ Clinical Case Challenge 📚 Source: Prometric — Public Health & Preventive Medicine MCQs 📝 A project has the activity-over-arrow node diagram above, starting at node 1 and ending at node 6. What is the critical path? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎓 Medicine Hub — 465,000+ board questions with full explanations, images and analytics. 🌐 hub.medicine.ac • #Quiz #InternalMedicine_Quiz
⚕️ Bedside Clinics in Medicine with COLOUR Photos and Clinical Integration — Part 1 📝 Course Overview: CBS PUBLISHER • 1ST EDITION Bedside Clinics in Medicine with COLOUR Photos and Clinical Integration — Part 1 Bedside Clinics in Medicine — Part 1 by Arup Kumar Kundu is a comprehensive question-answer format clinical reference designed to build clinical... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #Book #Internal_Medicine #Phys…
⚕️ Harvard 49th Annual Intensive Review of Internal Medicine 2026 📝 Course Overview: HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL • BOSTON, MA • JULY 19-26, 2026 Harvard 49th Annual Intensive Review of Internal Medicine 2026 Intensive Review of Internal Medicine (IRIM) 2026 — the most comprehensive internal medicine review offered by the clinical faculty of Harvard... 💙 Edition: 2026 📁 Category: #Internal_Medicine #Board #Harv…
Which one of the following changes should be made to this patient's medication regimen to help improve his symptoms?
- Increase aspirin to 325 mg daily0%
- Start coenzyme Q10 60 mg once daily0%
- Initiate amlodipine 5 mg once daily0%
- Start lisinopril 5 mg once daily0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚕️ Clinical Case Challenge 🏢 Brand: AMBOSS 📚 Source: AMBOSS Internal Medicine (ABIM) 📝 .nowrap { white-space: nowrap; } .scientific-name { font-style: italic; } .wichtig { font-weight: bold; } A 65-year-old man with a history of hyperlipidemia and gout presents with exertional chest pressure. He had a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction 6 years ago, when an angiogram showed a severe culprit left circumfle…
⚕️ AMBOSS NEJM Knowledge+ Internal Medicine QBank 2026 — PDF Elite Edition 📝 Course Overview: 2026 PDF Edition AMBOSS + NEJM Knowledge+ Internal Medicine (ABIM) 2026 The ABIM NEJM Knowledge+ Study Plan in PDF The AMBOSS Internal Medicine (ABIM) study plan built around NEJM Knowledge+ — a structured, high-yield board preparation pathway — compiled into... 💙 Edition: 2026 📁 Category: #Internal_Medicine #AMBOSS #Board…
⚕️ BoardVitals Internal Medicine QBank 2025 📝 Course Overview: 💎 One-Time Payment. Lifetime Access. Instant Online Access. 📘 Total Questions: 2,130 board-style Internal Medicine MCQs + 303 Shelf questions 💻 Windows compatible. 💡 Mac supported via any modern browser. 📱 New: Run the QBank on your phone with the... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #Board #BoardVitals #Internal_Medicine #Qbank 👇 Tap the buttons below to ex
Which one of the following additional physical findings is most consistent with a diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis?
- Radiation of the murmur to the neck33%
- A bounding carotid pulse11%
- A soft or absent aortic component of the second heart sound33%
- Presence of a fourth heart sound11%
- A loud aortic component of the second heart sound11%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚕️ Clinical Case Challenge 🏢 Brand: AMBOSS 📚 Source: AMBOSS Internal Medicine (ABIM) 📝 .nowrap { white-space: nowrap; } .scientific-name { font-style: italic; } .wichtig { font-weight: bold; } An 81-year-old man with hypertension reports slight dyspnea and chest tightness when walking uphill or climbing stairs during the past year. His blood pressure has been well controlled on hydrochlorothiazide and enalapril. On …
⚕️ Harvard Updates in General Internal Medicine for Specialists 2026 📝 Course Overview: Harvard Updates in General Internal Medicine for Specialists 2026 The definitive 2026 roadmap for specialists. A comprehensive 64-video review of clinical advancements across 35+ medical specialties, from AI integration to modern obesity and cardiovascular care. Harvard Medical School AI in... 💙 Edition: 2026 📁 Category: #Harvar…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @medicine_IM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What is the critical path?
- 90%
- 140%
- 210%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which one of the following changes should be made to this patient's medication regimen to help improve his symptoms?
- Increase aspirin to 325 mg daily0%
- Start coenzyme Q10 60 mg once daily0%
- Initiate amlodipine 5 mg once daily0%
- Start lisinopril 5 mg once daily0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which one of the following additional physical findings is most consistent with a diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis?
- Radiation of the murmur to the neck33%
- A bounding carotid pulse11%
- A soft or absent aortic component of the second heart sound33%
- Presence of a fourth heart sound11%
- A loud aortic component of the second heart sound11%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,115,303 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Internal Medicine Resources | Medicine.ac” (@medicine_IM), 62 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medicine_IM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.