📅 28 сентября — 3 октября 🩺 Практический курс по офисной гистероскопии в клинике «Mediofarm EKO» совместно с MEDBOOK Открыт новый набор для врачей, которые хотят углубить знания и получить практические навыки под руководством опытного специалиста. В программе: 🔹 Современная диагностика и лечение внутриматочной патологии 🔹 Практическая работа и участие в процедурах 🔹 Разбор клинических случаев 🔹 Индивидуальный формат …

Channel
MEDBOOK.UZ
@mediccare_uz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,960subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001399207489 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mediccare_uz |
| Created | Between 1 July 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mediccare_uz |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 1,960 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 1,959 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 1,961 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:03 | 1,960 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 1,961 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 1,959 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 1,958 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 1,961 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 1,962 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 1,954 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 1,953 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 1,951 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 1,951 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 20s
- Average length
- 47s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 55.6% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🗓️24 августа Medbook запускает ПЕРВЫЙ онлайн-поток 🚀 «ACR BI-RADS vs 2025» Раздел: Ультразвуковая диагностика Теперь присоединиться к обучению можно из любого города и страны — без необходимости приезжать на офлайн-курс. Во время обучения у участников будет общий чат с преподавателем и коллегами. Можно будет задавать вопросы, обсуждать сложные моменты, делиться клиническими ситуациями и получать обратную связь. 💬 👩⚕…
❤3🔥1
С 14 по 22 сентября MEDBOOK совместно с командой MEDIOFARM ECO проведёт интенсив: «Вспомогательные репродуктивные технологии» Для врачей, которые хотят не собирать знания по кусочкам, а увидеть целостную систему работы с бесплодием и программами ВРТ. От диагностики бесплодия → до ЭКО и переноса эмбрионов Будем разбирать весь путь: 🧬 нарушения гемостаза и репродуктивная функция 🧬 патология кариотипа при бесплодии 🧬 п…
👍1
📣Medbook открывает набор на новый онлайн-курс 🔥 «ACR BI-RADS vs 2025» Раздел: Ультразвуковая диагностика BI-RADS — это не просто цифра в заключении. Как корректно описывать находку? Какую категорию присвоить? Когда рекомендовать наблюдение, а когда — дальнейшую диагностику? На курсе разберём систему структурно, понятно и на клинических примерах, чтобы знания можно было применять в работе. ⭐️⭐️⭐️ Преподаватель: Каюм…
❤2👍2
Напишите свой вариант — возможно, именно по вашему запросу мы добавим отдельный блок в программу. Спасибо за ваши ответы! Мы хотим создать не просто курс о пептидах, а актуальную образовательную программу, которую врач сможет применять в своей профессиональной практике.⬇️⬇️⬇️
Что вам важнее всего получить от курса? 📖❕
- Базовое понимание56%
- Современные научные исследования53%
- Доказательная база68%
- Практические подходы76%
- Схемы применения85%
- Мифы и реальные возможности пептидов38%
The shares total 376%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие направления пептидов вам интересны?🤔
- Эндокринология62%
- Метаболическое здоровье47%
- ЖКТ24%
- Сердечно-сосудистая система29%
- ЦНС и нервная система38%
- Иммунитет35%
- Геронтология и anti-age32%
- Спорт и биохакинг24%
- Косметология и регенерация29%
The shares total 320%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Насколько вам интересна тема пептидов?
- Очень интересна 👀37%
- Интересна, но мало знаю 🤔47%
- Уже использую в практике📋10%
- Пока не интересна 🧠13%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Дорогие коллеги! 👩⚕️👨⚕️ Мы готовим новый образовательный курс «Пептиды в современной медицине» и хотим собрать программу на основе ваших реальных запросов. Ниже — небольшой опрос. 📋
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @mediccare_uz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что вам важнее всего получить от курса? 📖❕
- Базовое понимание56%
- Современные научные исследования53%
- Доказательная база68%
- Практические подходы76%
- Схемы применения85%
- Мифы и реальные возможности пептидов38%
The shares total 376%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие направления пептидов вам интересны?🤔
- Эндокринология62%
- Метаболическое здоровье47%
- ЖКТ24%
- Сердечно-сосудистая система29%
- ЦНС и нервная система38%
- Иммунитет35%
- Геронтология и anti-age32%
- Спорт и биохакинг24%
- Косметология и регенерация29%
The shares total 320%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Насколько вам интересна тема пептидов?
- Очень интересна 👀37%
- Интересна, но мало знаю 🤔47%
- Уже использую в практике📋10%
- Пока не интересна 🧠13%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@vrachi_uzbekistana · 23,419
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 18 September 2026
@kalinchenko_dlya_pacientov · 40,399
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
@tibtoifa · 42,219
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
@tibbiyot_haqida · 57,582
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MEDBOOK.UZ” (@mediccare_uz), 1,960 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mediccare_uz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.