Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🏥 Медицина | Студент | Лікар 🇺🇦

Channel

🏥 Медицина | Студент | Лікар 🇺🇦

@medic_s

Not marked by Telegram, checked 28 September 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,544subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002179209301
TypeChannel
Username@medic_s
DescriptionЦікаві факти про медицину https://t.me/med_student_chat Чат для спілкування та взаємодопомоги студентів
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 September 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/medic_s

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 18:229,544first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 9 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.0%
avg views ÷ 9,544 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,290
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held18 (9 September 2026 – 19 September 2026)
Views total41,290
Reactions total662
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,810
Videos
≈1,800
Links
≈16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 33s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

662 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤51377.5%
😁517.70%
🤯385.74%
🤣263.93%
🍓71.06%
👍60.906%
👻60.906%
🐳50.755%
😭40.604%
❤‍🔥30.453%
🎉30.453%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 662 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Sept 2026, 08:35 UTC≈2,270 views137 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Коли сонний вчив анатомію і все перемішалося в голові

❤77😁51❤‍🔥3🍓3🎉3

19 Sept 2026, 05:32 UTC≈2,410 views12 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

М’язи, що беруть участь у згинанні та розгинанні стегна 🔍На анімації зображені кравецький та двоголовий м’язи. Перший - згинає, другий - розгинає. Але насправді в цьому процесі бере участь набагато більше м’язів! ✅ Згинають стегно п’ять таких м’язів: ▪️ клубово-поперековий м’яз; ▪️ прямий м’яз стегна; ▪️ напружувач широкої фасції; ▪️ гребінчастий м’яз; ▪️ кравецький м’яз. ✅ Розгинають стегно п’ять таких м’язів: ▪…

❤12

18 Sept 2026, 17:59 UTC≈1,680 views56 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @students_medic_uaPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

❤51🐳4🍓1

18 Sept 2026, 17:39 UTC≈1,720 views18 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

👇Для більшості людей «камені в нирках» — це просто дрібний, непомітний пісок. Але реальність набагато різноманітніша і часом досить моторошна. Подивіться на ці фото з медичного пабліка: 💥 Гігантські розгалужені утворення (фото 1) — це так звані коралоподібні конкременти. Вони ростуть роками через хронічні інфекції, повністю заповнюючи ниркову миску зсередині. Найпідступніше те, що вони можуть взагалі не викликати го…

❤15🍓3

18 Sept 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,760 views28 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🔥 Коли професія залишає свій слід. 📸На фото — лімфатичні вузли шахтаря з вираженим чорним забарвленням. Ні, це не «чорний гній» і не обов’язково пухлинний процес. 🩺Упродовж років роботи в умовах вугільного пилу частинки вуглецю можуть поглинатися макрофагами та переноситися лімфатичною системою. У лімфатичних вузлах цей пігмент накопичується, формуючи картину антракозу — своєрідного «пилового архіву» професійного мин…

❤24😭4

18 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC≈2,170 views60 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Наслідок прийому ін'єкційних наркотиків.

🤯38❤21👻1

18 Sept 2026, 11:33 UTC≈1,960 views23 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🔺Ракова пухлина в легенях. 🔍Збільшення у 330 разів

❤23

17 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC≈2,110 views21 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Таблетки карбонату лантану на рентнограмі 🔍Пацієнт проковтнув призначені йому таблетки, що зв’язують фосфати, цілими, замість того щоб їх розжувати. 🔺Лантан є високорентгеноконтрастним, що і зумовило такий характерний вигляд на рентгенівському знімку.

❤21

17 Sept 2026, 06:59 UTC≈2,060 views36 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣26❤10

16 Sept 2026, 15:57 UTC≈2,190 views19 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

🔍 Екстравазація нейтрофілів - процес, під час якого ця фракція лейкоцитів залишає судини та переміщується безпосередньо до тканин. Екстравазація нейтрофілів запускається шляхом вивільнення медіаторів запалення для термінового вирішення проблеми (рани, інфекції тощо). ✔️Цей логістичний ланцюг відточений організмом до досконалості.

❤19

16 Sept 2026, 12:58 UTC≈2,260 views33 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

🔺Видалення кісти мочки вуха. Кіста - патологічна порожнина в тканинах або органах, що має стінку та вміст.

❤33

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @medic_s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Медична бібліотека📚
@ifnmu_book · 34,804
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 September 2026
Бібліотека Медичної Літератури
@nmulib · 35,615
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🏥 Медицина | Студент | Лікар 🇺🇦” (@medic_s), 9,544 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medic_s.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.