Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Уничтожитель Медиек

@mediaxkill

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

34subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003984705893
TypeChannel
Username@mediaxkill
Created11 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mediaxkill

Growth

3410 Aug 2026, 20:45 — 34 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 00:16 — 34 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:4511 Aug 2026, 00:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–35 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:1634no change
10 Aug 2026, 20:4534first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 20:02 UTC181 viewsread 11 August 2026

VS Mortyx — 5:0 ✅ Хороший соперник. Спасибо за дуэль. Без негатива, удачи в следующих играх.

13 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC185 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Скоро игра против Мортикс. Как думаете, кто победит? 👀

  1. Я65%
  2. Мортикс35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC200 viewsread 11 August 2026

VS Nuroffen — 5:1 ✅ Неплохая игра. Уважение за то, что принял вызов. Без конфликтов и без негатива.

13 Jul 2026, 18:34 UTC983 viewsread 11 August 2026

Многие уже сделали выводы обо мне. Поэтому решил больше ничего не доказывать словами. Этот канал — только про дуэли, результаты и новые вызовы игрокам. Первые результаты уже есть. Дальше — больше. Если интересно наблюдать за этим — добро пожаловать: https://t.me/mediaxkill

13 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC218 viewsread 11 August 2026

VS Staroy — 5:0 ✅ Сильные игроки доказывают всё в игре. Спасибо Staroy за дуэль. Без лишних слов и без негатива.

11 Jul 2026, 22:53 UTC198 viewsread 11 August 2026

VS Admiral — 5:0 ✅ Также сыграл дуэль с ним. Без конфликтов и без негатива. Результат остаётся в истории. Двигаемся дальше.

11 Jul 2026, 22:51 UTC200 viewsread 11 August 2026

VS Hisoka — 5:3 ✅ Первый дуэль на этом канале. Hisoka — сильный соперник, дал достойный отпор. Именно с такими игроками интересно играть. Никакого негатива между нами нет. После дуэли каждый остался при своём, без конфликтов и лишних слов. Уважение тем, кто отвечает не сообщениями, а своей игрой. Дальше — только новые вызовы и новые результаты.

11 Jul 2026, 22:01 UTC218 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Добро пожаловать. Этот канал — про дуэли против медийных игроков. Раньше меня знали как сильного игрока. Потом были поражения, и многие перестали воспринимать меня всерьёз. Не собираюсь оправдываться - собираюсь доказывать игрой. Здесь будут: дуэли с медийными игроками, результаты без оправданий, новые вызовы сильнейшим. Если ты медийный игрок и уверен в себе — пиши. Посмотрим, кто окажется сильнее. Громче всего смею

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mediaxkill. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTCAnonymous Poll57 voters

Скоро игра против Мортикс. Как думаете, кто победит? 👀

  1. Я65%
  2. Мортикс35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 13 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 914,116 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Уничтожитель Медиек” (@mediaxkill), 34 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mediaxkill.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.