3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 344–345 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 06:15
344
-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:50
345
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:43
345
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 5 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 344 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
16.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
15 (5 August 2025 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
37
Reactions total
6
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
47s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
164 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
45
27.4%
custom 5195463835930085418
34
20.7%
👍
33
20.1%
❤🔥
14
8.54%
😁
13
7.93%
🐳
5
3.05%
💯
5
3.05%
custom 5208716326889079903
4
2.44%
💔
4
2.44%
custom 5246917922093286171
2
1.22%
🕊
2
1.22%
custom 5202169521124688434
1
0.61%
🙏
1
0.61%
🤝
1
0.61%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mediatormood. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2025 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ТАЙМ МЕНЕДЖМЕНТ и запрос на него
Сегодня со мной связались из компании ВсеИнструменты и попросили провести для них повторно тренинрг по тайм менеджменту.
Тема актуальна для всех, кто каждый день распределяет свои задачи и расставляет приоритеты.
У меня мягкий подход в этом плане. Его называют Дзен-планированием.
1) Узнаем свой тип в тайм-менеджменте.
Когда и как лично вам удобно выполнять те или иные задачи? Каки…
Копинг-стратегии для мозга
Удивительно он все-таки работает.
В январе этого года я пережила длительный серьезный стресс. Перевозила через пол страны бабушку с деменцией из квартиры с тараканами, где пришлось какое-то время пожить. Это сопровождалось ее нервозностью, поиском потерянных документов и разбором квартиры.. бррр
Результат – по сей день непроизвольно трясу ногой и поджимаются губы. Нервные тики.
И вот на …
То, что мы не принимаем в других — есть в нас самих.
Появился у меня тут знакомый один. И вот столько раз уже от него слышу одну и ту же историю: ДА, ЭТО ХОРОШО, НО МНЕ НЕ КОМФОРТНО.
Да, у меня огромный опыт в этой сфере, и я могу дать крутое коммерческое бизнесу, но чет мне надоело
Да, это офигенная стрижка, но когда волосы отрастают некомфортно
Да, знаю что надо вовремя ложиться, но хочется еще посидеть
Я очен…
Завершился большой проект, в котором я участвовала как бизнес-тренер.
Я получила массу удовольствия и интересного опыта в этой работе.
Благодарна каждому, кто за эти полтора года посещал мои занятия и делился своими знаниями с группой.
Вы очень крутые, спасибо вам😌
ГДЕ НОРМА?
В пятницу проводила очередной тренинг. Темой были техники самоуспокоения. Я принесла серьезные упражнения из DBT-терапии.
Она была создана для людей с пограничным расстройством личности, сейчас используется для помощи людям и с другими психическими расстройствами: биполярное, шизоаффективное и тд. То есть артиллерия-то тяжелая.
А несла я это все для тех, кто стрессует на работе. Думала: ну точно поможет.
…
В этом месяце мы с моим партнером Еленой Зарубиной сделали новый проект — тренинг-центр ДиалогиPRO.
Здесь мы будем анонсировать и проводить тренинги по коммуникации, переговорам и soft-skills (тайм-менеджмент, работа с мышлением и тд)
Кому будет полезно?
➡️ Бизнесу, который хочет взрастит свои команды и вывести коммуникацию внутри коллектива и с клиентами/подрядчиками на новый уровень
➡️ Людям, которые интересуют…
КТО ХОЧЕТ ТРЕНИРОВАТЬ НАВЫКИ?
- Отказывать
- Просить
- Хвалить
- Критиковать
- Конфликтовать
- Выржать свое мнение
Это – базовые навыки коммуникации.
Если хотя бы один из них западает – снижается качество жизни, ведь тогда сложнее корректно общаться и получать свое.
Здесь можно сделать чек-ап своих навыков, чтобы понять, нужно ли вам тренировать что-то https://t.me/mediatormood/230
А здесь вы можете получить по…
ФОРМУЛА ОТКАЗА
Только что отвела еще один тренинг по Dark Side коммуникации: навык отказа.
Тема темная, а улыбок, смеха и ярких эмоций было очень много у всех участников)
Традиционно поделюсь с вами одной из фишек тренинга.
Вот как выглядит формула мягкого отказа:
ПРИЗНАНИЕ ЗНАЧИМОСТИ
⬇️
САМ ОТКАЗ
⬇️
АЛЬТЕРНАТИВА / ОБЪЯСНЕНИЕ /
НЕЙТРАЛЬНАЯ ТОЧКА ЗРЕНИЯ
Например:
-«Мы ценим наше партнерство, и то что вы готовы…
Я ОТДАЛА СВОИХ ДЕТЕЙ
Мне все еще сложно об этом говорить, но решила рассказать, тк это важно для меня.
В 2022 году я, в порыве любви к индонезийскому острову, создала благотворительное волонтерское движение.
Мы ездили в приюты, где детям не на чем спать и привозили кроватки, ремонтировали крышу, там где она протекала, носили малышей на ручках и играли с ними там, где детям не хватает тепла.
Вот уже 2 года, как я н…
ДЕТСКАЯ ТЕМА
Детей у меня нет, но их я очень люблю и с удовольствием вникаю во все процессы.
А процессы, в том числе, завязаны на коммуникации, как мы понимаем.
Так вот.
Недавно моя племянница плакала. Была сильно расстроена одной ситуацией, связанной с лагерем. Вдаваться в детали не буду, это ее слезы.
Я и мама пытались ее успокоить.
Но трагедия не кончалась, а разговор шел по кругу — верный признак того, что нуж…
ЧТО ДЕЛАТЬ В КОНФЛИКТНОЙ СИТУАЦИИ
Если этот конфликт вам ни к чему, а общение с человеком важно – нужно показать, что вы на одной стороне.
Помню как-то было сильное недопонимание с молодым человеком, я прямо брала его за руку, встала рядом и показывала: «Недопонимание там, МЫ ЗДЕСЬ. Давай ВМЕСТЕ придумаем, что с этим делать». Помогло сильно.
Как сделать то же самое, если такая визуализация неуместна?
Нужно показат…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @mediatormood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 64,339 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@mediatormood named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@spasibobali named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PeaceTeam с Натали Демьяненко | Переговоры, коммуникация, медиация” (@mediatormood), 344 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mediatormood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
