Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MedConsult Translation

Channel

MedConsult Translation

@medconsult_translation

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,070subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001748124070
TypeChannel
Username@medconsult_translation
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/medconsult_translation

Growth

1,0691,0721,070.57 August 2026 — 1,070 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,070 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,072 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,070 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,069 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,070 subscribers1,0707 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,069–1,072 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 17:551,070+1
14 Aug 2026, 12:571,069-1
11 Aug 2026, 01:421,070-2
8 Aug 2026, 08:581,072+2
8 Aug 2026, 00:171,070no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:031,070first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.1%
avg views ÷ 1,070 subscribers
Avg views / post
237
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,495
Reactions total104
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

104 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3331.7%
👏1918.3%
🔥1918.3%
😁1514.4%
👍109.62%
🤣32.88%
21.92%
💯21.92%
😱10.962%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026

#что_почитать Переводческая скоропись — навык, который часто ассоциируется только с устным переводом. Но на самом деле она помогает развивать умение быстро выделять главное, структурировать информацию и фиксировать смысл, а не отдельные слова. Если вы хотите познакомиться с этой техникой или освежить знания, вот вам рекомендация от опытных переводчиков: «Переводческая скоропись». 📚 @medconsult_translation

Signed Софья

7 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC108 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1

Signed Софья

6 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC130 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сколько в мире профессиональных переводчиков жестового языка? Точного ответа нет. Единого мирового реестра не существует, а многие страны до сих пор не ведут официальную статистику. Тем не менее некоторые данные позволяют оценить масштаб профессии. • По данным ВОЗ, в Европе работает около 8491 профессионального переводчика жестового языка. В среднем это 1 переводчик на 162 пользователя жестового языка, однако разл

3

Signed Софья

5 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC147 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Интересно, есть ли среди нас сурдопереводчики?

  1. Да, это я! 🥇3%
  2. Увы, точно не я 🙂‍↔️94%
  3. Немного понимаю и могу изъясняться на языке жестов 🌺3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Софья

4 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC171 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Спасибо за участие во вчерашнем тесте! ✅ Правильный ответ: пункт 3. Опухолевые клетки не усиливают апоптоз, а, наоборот, приобретают способность избегать программируемой гибели. 🔬 Апоптоз — это активная, генетически запрограммированная гибель клетки. Если клетка получает серьезные повреждения, например накапливает критические мутации ДНК, она может «запустить» программу самоуничтожения. Это один из важнейших механ

🔥52

Signed Софья

3 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC179 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Вопрос из области онкологии. Что из перечисленного НЕ относится к молекулярным основам канцерогенеза? (выберите один вариант) #тестпопнд

  1. Самодостаточность в ростовых сигналах13%
  2. Нечувствительность к ингибирующим рост сигналам8%
  3. Усиление апоптоза и программируемой гибели клеток59%
  4. Неограниченный репликативный потенциал3%
  5. Непрерывный ангиогенез13%
  6. Способность к инвазии и метастазированию0%
  7. Генетическая нестабильность вследствие нарушения репарации ДНК5%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Софья

1 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC230 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Все мы знаем, что место, где мы живем, влияет на настроение. Но может ли оно влиять на здоровье сердца? Ученые из Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute решили проверить это и в течение 20 лет наблюдали за здоровьем более 1200 женщин. Результаты показали, что у женщин, живущих в социально неблагополучных районах, показатели здоровья сердца были на 6–10 баллов ниже, чем у жительниц более благополучных районов. Более

👍3

Signed Софья

31 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC253 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

На каком факультете учились вы? 😊

😁6👏2

Signed Софья

30 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC271 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📢 Друзья, у нас есть небольшая новость о курсе «Конвейер переводов». Многие из вас спрашивали, будет ли в этом году новый живой поток курса. К сожалению, в этом году провести его не получится: автор курса, Евгений Бартов, полностью погружен в работу над другими профессиональными проектами и не сможет сопровождать новый поток в привычном формате. Но есть и хорошая новость ❤️ «Конвейер переводов» по-прежнему доступен

2🔥1

Signed Софья

29 Jul 2026, 06:05 UTC249 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡️Делимся полезной заметкой о том, как не попастя на удочку мошенников, если вы пользуетесь сервисом ПрофиРу: https://t.me/legal_easy/190 Если у вас есть свои собственные советы или истории, связанные с платформами для фрилансеров, будем рады, если вы ими поделитесь здесь. 😊 ✍️ @medconsult_translation

2🔥1

Signed Софья

27 Jul 2026, 23:10 UTC294 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💡 Как переводчик может монетизировать свою экспертизу? Долгое время считалось, что основной способ заработка переводчика — выполнять переводы. Но последние несколько лет показали, что профессиональные знания могут быть ценны и сами по себе. После пандемии многие специалисты стали делиться своим опытом: создавать онлайн-школы, записывать курсы, проводить консультации и вебинары, становиться наставниками. Это коснуло

👍7😱1

Signed Софья

27 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC255 viewsread 8 August 2026

⚡️ Задумывались ли вы о происхождении слова germ 🦠? Делимся познавательной заметкой из блога Татьяны: 🔗 https://t.me/crazytranslatorme/542 ✍️ @medconsult_translation

Signed Софья

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @medconsult_translation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

Интересно, есть ли среди нас сурдопереводчики?

  1. Да, это я! 🥇3%
  2. Увы, точно не я 🙂‍↔️94%
  3. Немного понимаю и могу изъясняться на языке жестов 🌺3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz39 voters

Вопрос из области онкологии. Что из перечисленного НЕ относится к молекулярным основам канцерогенеза? (выберите один вариант) #тестпопнд

  1. Самодостаточность в ростовых сигналах13%
  2. Нечувствительность к ингибирующим рост сигналам8%
  3. Усиление апоптоза и программируемой гибели клеток59%
  4. Неограниченный репликативный потенциал3%
  5. Непрерывный ангиогенез13%
  6. Способность к инвазии и метастазированию0%
  7. Генетическая нестабильность вследствие нарушения репарации ДНК5%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Книжный Вестник
@duosoft_books · 119,627
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MedConsult Translation” (@medconsult_translation), 1,070 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medconsult_translation.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.