Channel
@med25_26
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,095subscribers
+81 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002548480944 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @med25_26 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/med25_26 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 4,095 | +85 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 4,010 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 4,017 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 4,014 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,806 |
| Reactions total | 89 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
89 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 79 | 88.8% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 6.74% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.25% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 2.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
علبالي الاكتئاب راه مخيّم على الكنال 😂 والطلبة راه لاحقينها غي تحواس 😭😂 لي عندو شحال ما يضحكش هههه: 4 صوالح ما نآمنش بيهم في الحياة: 1️⃣ المغرب عندها 2 كؤوس إفريقيا 🏆🏆 2️⃣ تزوّج والعرس علينا 💍😂 3️⃣ 5 دقايق ونكون عندك 🚗💨 4️⃣ دزاير فيها مستقبل 😭🇩🇿 إذا آمنت بواحدة منهم… راك تحتاج تراجع حساباتك مع الحياة 😂💀
😭6🤣2
🩺 طالب طب؟ سواء راك فالسنة الأولى ولا قربت تتخرج... هاد البلاصة معمولة ليك. جمعنالك أفضل القنوات والمصادر الطبية في مكان واحد 📚 وش تلقى داخل القائمة؟ 🫀 قنوات خاصة بطلبة الطب من السنة الأولى حتى السابعة. 📖 شروحات واضحة، ملخصات، QCM، كتب ومراجع معتمدة. 🎥 أفضل قنوات اليوتيوب والأساتذة لي يشرحو بالفهم، ماشي غير بالحفظ. 🧠 نصائح للمراجعة، تنظيم الوقت، وكيفاش تحضر للامتحانات بذكاء. ⚕️ محتوى طبي موثوق، حالات سريرية، ورسومات…
❤1
Signed MedicalFilesBot
Quelle est la principale protéine responsable de la pression oncotique plasmatique🤔 ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤6
Où se déroulent principalement les échanges gazeux🙃 ?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4
Quel groupe sanguin est considéré comme donneur universel des globules rouges 🙂?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥2❤1
Nhdro 3la biochimie ✨✨⚡️⚡️ Hwa module li twiiil ra7 t9raw Au début 3la les glucides 🍯 mchi 7aja li s3iba normal 🙂🙂 Had lmodul Il est connu par des mots scientifiques twaal momkn tjikom bizarre 🙃 Lprof yfaham raya en plus de cela ymli 3likom chi li tktboh✍✍ Lprof my7bch ychof ktab ta3 résumé wla une autre source fsa3a ta3 lcour ta3h 🤷♂🤷♂ Hwa kan ygol les résum ta3 biochimie fihom les fautes ..Il n'est pas responsa…
❤1
بالنسبة chimie، هو مودول ساهل إذا عرفت كيفاش تقراه. البروف تفهم مليح 👍، وتمشي حبة حبة، يعني ما تجريش في الكور، حط راسك باش تفهم. هو مودول فيه بزاف معلومات راكم أصلًا قريتوها وعارفينها من الليسي. ننصحكم تحضرو الكور وتكتبو مع البروف des notes برك. كي تروح للدار، عاود الكور، وزيد حل معاه الـ QCM ولا التمارين. هكذا راح تكون متقدم فيه، وما راحش تكرهو. بالنسبة للـ QCM تاع الامتحان، ما يكونوش نفس الأسئلة يعني كاين جدي…
❤1
Livre de Pr Si Salah Hammoudi رحمه الله ✨👌 الكتب التي نتفق جميعا على أنّها استثنائية بحق 😭❤️... رحمة الله عليه، أسهب في ذكر التفاصيل ولم يترك جانبا إلا و تطرق إليه ، لذا لا تندهشوا عند استعمال الكتب 😂 ، فقط تعلّموا استخدامها و الاخذ منها بذكاء 👌♥️... عليكم به 🌹✨ https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P3_8M46IKoi3af33p0pq-9axUvGxD0ts/view?usp=drivesdk
❤4
En plus le coefficient de l'anatomie 2 et est module annuel tfawto fih 2 emd m3a emd tfawto exmen tp Pour calculer la moyenne la note de( emd 1 + emd 2) *0.8 + la note de( tp1 +tp2 )*0.2
❤3
🟢نبداو بال anatomie،او مايسمى بعلم التشريح، محبوبة الجماهير 😂، أكثر موديل يحسسك انك راك فكلية الطب فعلا .. وطبعا يعاونك باش تلعبها دكتور قدام العائلة 😏 تقراو 5 تع les chapitres فكل سوماستر : Ostéologie تقراو على العظام Arthrologie علم المفاصل Myologie تقراو على العضلات Angiologie تقراو على الاوردة والشرايين Neurologie علم الاعصاب فالسوماستر 1 على الجزء العلوي 💪🏻 ، فالسوماستر 2 على الجزء السفلي 🦵🏻. تقريكم بروف اسمها …
❤5
على بركة الله نبدأ بمجموعة من نصائح وتوجيهات 😄 خاصة بتلمسان راح نعطوكم نضرة اولية عن كل موديل والبروف لي يقريه😄😉🫶💐
❤4
😄 شباب... السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته أولًا... ألف ألف مبروك! 🎉 ورحبوا بينا ونرحبوا بيكم في الجيش الأبيض... الجيش اللي يكفيه شرفًا أنه اختار رسالة عظيمة، رسالة فيها تعب، مسؤولية، وإنقاذ للأرواح. إذا راك اليوم وصلت لكلية الطب... فاعرف بلي هذي مجرد البداية. 😄 قدّامكم مشوار فيه السهر، القهوة تولّي أعز صديق، ومرات راح تحسو بلي الدروس أكثر من ساعات النهار! 😂 بصح صدقونا... كل دقيقة تعب راح تكون تستاهل، وكل تضحية اليو…
❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @med25_26. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Quelle est la principale protéine responsable de la pression oncotique plasmatique🤔 ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Où se déroulent principalement les échanges gazeux🙃 ?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Quel groupe sanguin est considéré comme donneur universel des globules rouges 🙂?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,090,794 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Simplified resumé by Alaa & Houssam” (@med25_26), 4,095 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/med25_26.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.