Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мечта Слоника 🪷| Украшения из смолы и камней

Channel

Мечта Слоника 🪷| Украшения из смолы и камней

@mechta_slonika

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

226subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002105392246
TypeChannel
Username@mechta_slonika
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mechta_slonika

Growth

2222262246 August 2026 — 222 subscribers7 August 2026 — 222 subscribers15 August 2026 — 226 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 221–227 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:44226+4
7 Aug 2026, 03:16222no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:47222first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.6%
avg views ÷ 226 subscribers
Avg views / post
128
1 post measured
Reaction rate
13.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held10 (10 June 202621 July 2026)
Views total128
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

178 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7642.7%
6938.8%
❤‍🔥116.18%
🥰116.18%
😍52.81%
💘42.25%
🦄21.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC128 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

поменяла сумку ✨🥰 на солнышке ваще красота

🔥8❤‍🔥63

19 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC158 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

тоже хочу показать 🥰

🔥125❤‍🔥4

19 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC141 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Этот обвесик уже успел доехать до Нижнего Новгорода 🥹❤️‍🔥

9🔥1🥰1

15 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC211 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Это нереально красиво!!!😍😍😍 успевайте забрать, пока есть)))

🔥106😍4

14 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC202 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добавила обвесы в подборку «Товары» 🤩 Вот например ссылка на обвес с вишенками 🍒 Можете полистать более подробные фотографии понравившегося вам украшения 🤍

🔥125💘1😍1

14 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC165 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Это был очень долгий путь, который оказался весьма сложнее, чем я думала, но теперь вы можете увидеть результат!🥹 Наконец в ассортименте появились долгожданные обвесы, скоро заполню «Товары» и расскажу про каждый отдельно, но уже очень хочется поделиться!! А какой больше всего понравился вам?🥹❤️ P.S. а еще их можно самостоятельно изменять и миксовать друг с другом ✨

15🔥9💘2🦄2

29 Jun 2026, 15:18 UTC260 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Помните те самые съедобные бусики из детства?🥹 Видели вы или нет, но сейчас они – хит сезона!🔥 Только уже не из конфеток, а из натурального кварца) Нежнейшего цвета, с приятным холодком от камней, идеальные для лета 🥹🥹 Есть вариант и «потолще», и «потоньше», я для вас всё нашла! Ожерелье 1800 Браслет 950

10🔥7🥰2❤‍🔥1

18 Jun 2026, 10:02 UTC313 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥95🥰4💘1

18 Jun 2026, 10:00 UTC261 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Часто спрашивают, можно ли взять украшения комплектом, ответ прост – конечно да! Если вам понравилась какая-то позиция, и хочется в комплект браслет/ожерелье/серьги/кольцо, но в наличии этого нет – обязательно пишите, всегда можно собрать комплект персонально под вас) Вот тут например получился невероятно универсальный набор из цирконов (фианитов) в белом цвете, который подойдет под любую одежду и под любое событие

8🔥5🥰2

10 Jun 2026, 09:58 UTC237 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3🔥3🥰2

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mechta_slonika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 800,488 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мечта Слоника 🪷| Украшения из смолы и камней” (@mechta_slonika), 226 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mechta_slonika.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.