Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MEBЕRT 🟧 START

Channel

MEBЕRT 🟧 START

@mebert_method

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

203subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002035372634
TypeChannel
Username@mebert_method
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mebert_method

Growth

203204203.57 August 2026 — 204 subscribers8 August 2026 — 204 subscribers8 September 2026 — 203 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 32 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 203–204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 10:38203-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:18204no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:03204first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 2 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13m 19s
Average length
2m 40s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3035.7%
2833.3%
👍2226.2%
👏44.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2025 to 12 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2025, 11:46 UTC329 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У стартапа есть 6 секунд, чтобы зацепить инвестора. Готовы? Н76% инвесторов решают за 2 минуты, стоит ли ваш стартап их времени. Большинство фаундеров проваливаются не из-за плохого продукта, а из-за размытого позиционирования. 📊 Цифры: 1,35 млн+ tech-стартапов запущено в 2024 Только 30-40% проходят в Series A 87% успешных стартапов четко определяют свою категорию Среднее время изучения питча: сократилось до 90 сек

5👏1

7 Aug 2025, 09:31 UTC264 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔥 Почему стартапы горят - и выгорают - в США? Только что опубликовал новую статью о том, как международные стартапы теряют миллионы при выходе на американский рынок. 📊 Жесткая статистика: 70% провалов — из-за культурных ошибок $125М — потери только за последние 18 месяцев В 3 раза больше капитала нужно для международной экспансии Реальные кейсы 2024-2025: → Gro Intelligence (Кения) — $125М, закрыт → Koo (Индия) —

🔥21👏1

22 Jul 2025, 08:43 UTC202 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🚀 Чикаго, я снова здесь! Ежегодно возвращаюсь в этот город, и каждый раз он удивляет заново: на улицах витает дух предпринимательства, а каждая башня – портал в мир инноваций. Почему Чикаго — не просто большой город 🏦 Центр урбанистических робототехники и доставки: здесь тестируют автономные роботы и дроны для доставки еды по улицам и по воздуху — проекты вроде Coco Robotics и Zipline уже на практике ускоряют 4 млр

🔥2👏1

16 Jul 2025, 08:51 UTC163 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Зачем вашему стартапу нужна однострочная формулировка — и как её написать, чтобы вас поняли и запомнили. Если вы готовитесь к звонкам с инвесторами, подаёте заявку в акселератор или планируете выход на рынок США — есть одна вещь, без которой никуда. 👉 Чёткая, конкретная, однострочная формулировка позиционирования. Я не раз видел, как сильные основатели теряли внимание уже на 10-й секунде. Не потому что продукт пло

🔥2👍1

14 Jul 2025, 09:39 UTC116 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

ИИ, биотех, геополитика и мир на переломе. На 57-м Wharton Global Forum в Сан-Франциско эти слова — не модные термины, а живые темы, которые определяют, каким будет бизнес, инвестиции и лидерство в ближайшие 10 лет. Самое важное, что я вынес из общения и сессий: будущее принадлежит тем, кто мыслит на стыке дисциплин и на международном уровне. Сегодня уже недостаточно строить компанию только вокруг продукта или прив

🔥3👍2

30 Jun 2025, 09:17 UTC129 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Can the 🇺🇸 U.S. Keep Up with 🇨🇳 China in the AI Race? In this new episode of Neighbor Dialogue, venture capitalist Max Morgunov talks about one of the hottest debates in global tech: 📉 Will the U.S. fall behind China in AI and automation? 🎓 Why is China producing thousands of AI and robotics engineers each year — and what’s the strategy behind it? 🏭 How China's centralized model could power its $30 trillion indus

🔥2

28 Jun 2025, 09:02 UTC127 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

San Francisco. The city where revolutions in tech, finance, and business begin. 🚀 This week, it becomes the home of the 57th Wharton Global Forum — and I’m truly honored to be part of it. Over two days, alumni, faculty, and global business leaders come together to talk about what’s next: AI, biotech, entrepreneurship, the economy, the future of healthcare — all through the lens of bold ideas and real experience. W

👍63🔥2

26 Jun 2025, 07:30 UTC130 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

What’s Next for AI Startups Under the New U.S. Administration? In this new episode of Neighbor Dialogue, venture capitalist Max Morgunov shares insider insights on: - Why $130B+ in AI investments is just the beginning - What the industry expected from the U.S. government — and what actually happened - How tariffs, tax reforms, and deregulation could impact innovation - What startups should know about upcoming chang

3🔥3

18 Jun 2025, 11:14 UTC124 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Who Founds Startups in the US? More Often Than You Think—Immigrants.⚡️ And This Is No Coincidence. When I analyze success stories of technology companies in the US, one pattern strikes me. 👉 Consider this: 55% of technology companies valued at over $1 billion were created by people not born in America. This isn't a statistical anomaly—it's a structural phenomenon I've observed for decades. While guiding clients th

🔥42👏1

12 Jun 2025, 09:27 UTC108 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

You should not expect a simple "yes" or "no" from US startup investors when seeking funding. The process is nuanced, and investors often provide feedback, ask probing questions, or indicate interest in ways that require careful interpretation—especially for founders from Asia or Africa, where business communication styles may differ. ❗️Cultural Differences Matter In many Asian cultures, directness can be perceived

3🔥2

11 Jun 2025, 12:21 UTC82 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

You should not expect a simple "yes" or "no" from US startup investors when seeking funding. The process is nuanced, and investors often provide feedback, ask probing questions, or indicate interest in ways that require careful interpretation—especially for founders from Asia or Africa, where business communication styles may differ. ⚡How to Interpret US Startup Investor Answers ❗️Direct Communication is Valued US

👍32🔥1

10 Jun 2025, 11:12 UTC81 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Silicon Valley has long been synonymous with tech innovation and startup success, but launching a company there is not always the best choice—especially for early-stage startups. Several factors make alternative regions in the US increasingly attractive for founders seeking investment and growth. 🔴 Key Reasons Silicon Valley May Not Be Ideal 🟧 High Costs and Short Runway. Silicon Valley is one of the most expensi

🔥2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @mebert_method. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MEBЕRT 🟧 START” (@mebert_method), 203 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mebert_method.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.