Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for - Б𐌏𐌡⊙𐌕Н𐌀Я -

Channel

- Б𐌏𐌡⊙𐌕Н𐌀Я -

@me_sova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

104subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001851819335
TypeChannel
Username@me_sova
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/me_sova

Growth

1049 Aug 2026, 23:46 — 104 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 04:57 — 104 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 23:4610 Aug 2026, 04:57
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 103–105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:57104no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:46104first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
127.1%
avg views ÷ 104 subscribers
Avg views / post
132
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held12 (13 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,454
Reactions total122
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

130 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52604808146337485685441.5%
custom 52602370537648636373728.5%
1310.0%
custom 536625469651422666864.62%
custom 526053232847149550153.85%
custom 526028484816093272543.08%
🕊43.08%
custom 523330268249145342832.31%
💘21.54%
🤯21.54%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC45 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Арт-маркет прошел настолько бурно, что у меня опять ни одной толковой фотки. Зато много хороших впечатлений и тёплых знакомств 🌟 Спасибо большое всем! А еще вас теперь больше 100! Может устроить какой-нибудь конкурс/розыгрыш по этому поводу?🤨

custom 526023705376486363714🕊42custom 52604808146337485682

7 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC77 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вот я искренне стремлюсь к тому чтобы быть элегантной феей 🌟🌟 (Получается пока только зубной😶)

custom 52604808146337485685custom 52602848481609327254

5 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC102 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаю творить хтонь. Пробую гравером рисовать на камнях. Такие вот чутка дикие подвески 🪨🪨 🤌🤌🤌

custom 52602370537648636377custom 52333026824914534282custom 52604808146337485682

4 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC100 viewsread 9 August 2026

Кстати, в моей творческой студии в этом августе плотничком мастер-классы! Очень буду рад видеть всех желающих 🪹

4 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC98 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @gnesdo_nnPhoto

Дорогие друзья! Приглашаем всех желающих на наш марафон мастер-классов! Каждые выходные этого августа мы организуем для вас творческие вечера с разной тематикой. - 8 АВГУСТА - коллажный вечер🪹 Лёгкий формат творческой посиделки, отличная возможность раскрутить своё воображение и отдохнуть от будней за творческим занятием и чашечкой чая :) 16 АВГУСТА - полимерные украшения 🪹 Создадим свой уникальный стилёвый аксес

custom 53662546965142266685custom 52333026824914534281

4 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC115 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В марте мы с подругой делали из своих статуэток молоды для повторного литья. А недавно я сообразил, что вообще силикон так то термостойкий, а значит можно лить и горячий материал!! Закупил деревянных фитилей, чтобы трещало (это же пень всё-таки) И тадааа вашему вниманию первая партия свечек!! Они будут ждать вас на арт-маркете "Волчок" уже в это воскресенье!!

custom 5260480814633748568112

30 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC174 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52602370537648636377custom 53662546965142266681

30 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC169 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я еду стричься впервые с 2022 года... Настолько страшно не было уже давно 😩

custom 52602370537648636379🤯2custom 52605323284714955012

26 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC212 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мой сигнатурный подход в дизайне можноназвать "шизографикой" Найденная на обочине в поле ржавая раковина превратилась в абстрактную графику 💥

9custom 52604808146337485685

25 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC182 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Пробные странички для эцезиса 📖📖📖 📖📖📖

custom 526048081463374856813

23 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC180 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Смотрите черепуха какая 🦌

custom 526048081463374856810custom 52605323284714955013

13 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC220 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Поделюсь с вами ещё фрагментами всякого. Немного сыренького фотоматериала для нового зина/сборка. Он посвящен синтезу природы и городской среды. Борьбе за жизнь даже в самых неподходящих для неё условиях. Достаточно поэтичная тема, в которой я нахожу сильную поддержку в нынешнее время. Хочу и вам рассказать, как мягкая трава терпеливо разрушает каменистый асфальт. Как дерево мирно обнимает острый металлический забор

custom 52604808146337485686💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @me_sova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,307,539 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“- Б𐌏𐌡⊙𐌕Н𐌀Я -” (@me_sova), 104 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/me_sova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.