Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Annie was here ִֶָ🍂་༘࿐

Channel

Annie was here ִֶָ🍂་༘࿐

@me_dear_Ennie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

260subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001157203175
TypeChannel
Username@me_dear_Ennie
Descriptioneng | ua ЛЮБІМБА @kimimimiki
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 October 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held5
On Telegramt.me/me_dear_Ennie

Growth

259268263.512 September 2026 — 268 subscribers14 September 2026 — 267 subscribers25 September 2026 — 259 subscribers7 October 2026 — 260 subscribers12 October 2026 — 260 subscribers26012 September 202612 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 258–269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 14:22260no change
7 Oct 2026, 16:15260+1
25 Sept 2026, 23:57259-8
14 Sept 2026, 05:37267-1
12 Sept 2026, 13:47268first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 6 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.1%
avg views ÷ 260 subscribers
Avg views / post
83.5
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held16 (6 October 2026 – 12 October 2026)
Views total1,253
Reactions total90
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Oct 2026, 14:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,650
Videos
≈150
Links
≈238

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1617.8%
🔥1516.7%
💘1415.6%
❤‍🔥77.78%
🥰77.78%
🍓66.67%
custom 530980901653948706055.56%
custom 530985052739837791944.44%
custom 531009316728082272833.33%
custom 541141507504080688533.33%
🤗33.33%
💋22.22%
😁22.22%
custom 530771710117836433811.11%
custom 530804216148319028111.11%
🤪11.11%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @me_dear_Ennie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 October 2026 to 12 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Oct 2026, 05:13 UTC38 views3 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Я уникала роботи з пір'ям як могла

❤‍🔥2🍓1

11 Oct 2026, 19:52 UTC47 views8 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

У мене дилема яку сукню робити.... Піміжіть

💘5❤‍🔥1🍓1🤗1

11 Oct 2026, 11:16 UTC58 views5 reactionsread 12 October 2026

ЦЕ ОДИН ЕКЛЕР, ТУПА ТИ СОВА

🔥3🥰1😁1

11 Oct 2026, 11:16 UTC58 views2 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Я оказується знаю французький краще за тупий доулінго, який un Éclair перекладає як блискавка

❤2

10 Oct 2026, 13:59 UTC96 views7 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Одного дня я стану цією палеткою..

custom 53098505273983779194💘1🔥1custom 54114150750408068851

10 Oct 2026, 08:37 UTC158 views9 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥4custom 54114150750408068852❤1🤗1custom 53077171011783643381

8 Oct 2026, 21:25 UTC84 views9 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Я після уваги в англомовному Невермор фд просто не можу змиритись з думкою, що десь я не діва яку всі обожнюють.😭

❤3🍓3💋2🤪1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @me_dear_Ennie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ТРУХА⚡ Тернопіль
@truexaternopil · 27,393
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Annie was here ִֶָ🍂་༘࿐” (@me_dear_Ennie), 260 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/me_dear_Ennie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.