Channel
@mdjsj8
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,473subscribers
+2,785 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001443417291 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @m22222 @mdjsj8 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 38 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mdjsj8 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:19 | 3,473 | no change |
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 3,473 | -7,218 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 10,691 | no change |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 10,691 | -4,411 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 15,102 | -1,196 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 16,298 | -18,198 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 34,496 | no change |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 34,496 | -23 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 34,519 | no change |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 34,519 | -8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 34,527 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 34,527 | -25 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 34,552 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 34,552 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 34,554 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:11 | 34,554 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:32 | 34,557 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 34,556 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 34,556 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:45 | 34,556 | first reading |
511 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 280 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 511 (25 July 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 240,873 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 02:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 154 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 511 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 511 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#网友投稿：谨慎！海外高薪工作背后，暗藏着怎样的危机 三个多月前，经一位朋友牵线担保，他辞去了吉隆坡的稳定工作，远赴越南芽庄，加入了一家主营日本客户业务的公司，担任主管职位。凭借在芽庄带领团队奋斗了三个多月的成绩，为公司赚取了可观的利润，也因此赢得了老板的赏识与信任，双方的关系逐渐亲近起来。 八月初，公司发放工资时所需的一笔大额资金，老板交由他独自办理换汇，其间他恰好把握了汇率波动的机会，小赚了一笔差额。老板对此并未介意，反而称这是他应得的收入。八月中旬的一个晚上，老板再次安排他与司机一同前往朋友处，取回一笔对方归还的款项。他没多想，便按照老板的指示行事。在司机陪同下，他很快取回了装有现金的包裹📦，并交到了老板手中。 几天后，他请老板的司机喝酒，希望借此机会了解老板的一些喜好，打算在中秋节前为老板准备一份合心意的礼物。 几杯酒下肚，司机话多了起来，透露了老板对上回那个包裹里物品的偏爱。还说那包裹里面除了现金，竟还夹带着一…
#柬埔寨快讯｜金边隆边区一处住所遭执法突袭 逾千部手机与数百电脑零件被扣 9月9日中午12时30分，金边市当局依据市政府领导指示，协同多个相关单位，对位于隆边区的一处私人住所展开突击检查。 行动过程中，执法人员在现场发现一名47岁的柬埔寨籍女性屋主索·索帕妮，并起获手机共7箱，数量达1,145部；另有电脑零配件共16箱，总计471件。 经网络犯罪执法部门进行技术查验后，初步确认上述物品中并未发现与网络诈骗（Online Scam）相关的数据。目前，涉案人员及全部证物已移送经济犯罪打击部门，以便依法继续深入调查。至于该处住宅，则在程序完成后交还屋主照管。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx166
#越南资讯： 一个“快递来电”骗走近4亿盾：谎称误开通每月400万套餐，7人被逮捕 9月8日，谅山省公安机关通报了一起冒充快递客服的电信诈骗案，嫌疑人阮文后等7人已被立案拘留。该团伙自8月5日起作案，累计骗取多名被害人金额接近4亿越南盾。 该团伙专门搜集网购用户的个人信息，伪装成快递员拨打诈骗电话，声称受害者付款时不小心开通了某项服务，每月会自动扣除400万越南盾。 一旦受害者因担心损失而要求取消，电话会被转接给假扮仓库管理员或物流总公司职员的同伙，随后一步步诱骗受害者将钱转入指定的银行账户。 这个团伙分工非常细，事先准备了手机、电话卡、银行卡以及虚假的Facebook账号。阮文后负责租用场地、购置作案工具、分配任务并瓜分赃款，还要从中抽取50%的犯罪所得。 8月28日下午，警方突击搜查了谅山省武礼社欢中村的一间高脚屋，当场抓获9名正在冒充快递员拨打诱骗电话的嫌疑人。 据了解，阮文后此前曾前往柬埔寨的诈骗窝点工作，回国…
西港地下彩票“头号人物”落网 据柬埔寨当地媒体报道，西港省警察局于昨日展开突击执法行动，成功抓获本地规模最大的地下彩票庄家“汤先生”。目前，该嫌疑人已被警方暂时羁押于省警察局，正接受进一步讯问，后续将依照法律程序严肃处理。 与此同时，西港警方正持续加大排查力度，重点打击地下彩票、网络斗鸡等危害社会治安的非法赌博活动，相关涉案人员将面临法律严惩。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx166
#群友热议：人在异乡，守住这张嘴，尽量别讲这3类话，日子越过越舒心。 漂泊在外这些年，见过不少吃了“嘴亏”的人，细看之下，他们大多并非心存恶意，甚至有些人骨子里相当厚道，只是偶尔逞一时之快，嘴巴没个把门的，才让生活悄悄绕了弯路。 每个远行的人都该认清一个现实：泼出去的水，说出去的话，是永远收不回的。哪怕事后打再多的圆场，裂痕也早已在那里了。 要说身处异国最要不得的三句话，无外乎往下这三种。 头一件就是气话。人在异邦，谋生的压力、生活的孤独感全得自己往肚子里咽，属实不易。有人习惯把啥都闷着扛着，从不寻个出口，可能积蓄太久，理智终有绷不住的一刻，以致撂下种种狠话。要么隔着屏幕冲家人发泄，要么把积怨已久的同事故交，陡然得罪个彻底。 放狠话那几秒，心里像是开了闸，痛快了，可代价往往超乎想象。亲人之间容易落下难以消解的芥蒂，而身边的同事朋友也没有义务替你消化情绪，只会觉得你阴晴不定，渐行渐远。 其次要避免的，就是与己无关的闲言…
#老挝警方突查地下赌场：2人落网，40张德州扑克桌被缴 老挝公安部近日通报，执法部门针对万象市内一处藏匿于饭店中的非法赌博窝点展开清剿行动，现场逮捕2名涉案人员，并查获大批赌具设备。 据披露，此次突击检查于2026年9月5日实施。公安部特勤力量依法对万象市斯沙达那县蓬斯暖村一家名为“Phouangpha”的饭店进行搜查。行动中，警方当场控制2名嫌疑人，分别涉及1名老挝公民与1名韩国籍人员。 执法人员清点涉案物品时发现，该窝点经营规模颇为庞大，现场查扣的赌博设施包括：德州扑克专用赌桌多达40张、筹码7840枚、扑克牌976副、台式电脑6台、圆桌12张，以及大型LED显示屏1套。 值得注意的是，搜查过程中警方还发现一份以“Keoaloun Sengdara”（男，36岁，个体经营，登记地址位于万象市赛色塔县旺赛村）名义申办的“扑克棋牌类体育俱乐部”设立许可文件。该文件是否被用于掩盖非法赌博活动，目前已成为调查重点。 案件后…
#柬埔寨资讯：巴维市警方突击检查酒店，查获枪支及涉毒物品 9月9日，柬埔寨柴桢省巴维市执法部门采取联合行动，针对巴维市诺贝尔酒店（Nobel Bavet Hotel）展开突击检查，疑与该处涉及网络诈骗活动有关。 警方在酒店2220号房间内，查获6名越南籍人员（1女5男），现场起获笔记本电脑4台、手机11部，以及1支K59型手枪。据悉，其中一名越南籍男子被认定为枪支持有人。 与此同时，警方亦在1105号房间发现疑似毒品及吸毒工具。目前，涉案人员及相关物证已移交警方部门作进一步调查处理，2220号房间已被临时封闭。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx166
#人间清醒实录：又是不想努力的一天。 本月战报：目标数——零；额外收入——零；战斗意志——零；工资单到账——满格。 一套丝滑小连招。领导画了宏伟蓝图，我点头如捣蒜；主管喊口号冲刺，我面带微笑充耳不闻；工资条到手，我只想默默说声感谢。我的职业操守就是：KPI随缘，基本工资至上；梦想可以有，但摸鱼必须专业。 我的职场人设很清晰：拒绝内卷，拒绝狼性，坚决捍卫基本工资底线。只要我心态够稳、演技够真、水杯够烫，工位就是我的舒适区。铁打的营盘流水的兵，公司裁员我不慌，先跑为敬。 PS：心态到位了。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx166
#快讯：今日木牌诺贝尔酒店展开执法检查，现场逮捕3名男性及1名女性，均为中国籍，并查获多部手机、电脑等设备。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx166
#网友投稿：缅甸水沟谷曾经的亚太轻钢别墅区如今已彻底消失。在持续不断的网络诈骗打击行动下，该地区多个园区被相继清理、拆除，昔日热闹的建筑群落，现已化作一片空旷废墟。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx166
#群友反馈：提醒所有在波贝开展作业的团队，近期务必提高警惕，注意周边环境变化，加强安全防范，确保人员与财产万无一失。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx166
#群友爆料：3月27日拜林女省长带队突击清查，我和同乡等一百多名网络推广人员被当场抓获。我们几个人共同完成了三千多万的流水，却连一分钱佣金都没见到。代理史陈太郎早已卷着钱飞往国外挥霍。 代理当初说公司会出面保释，真到了里面却没人管我们。后来我们被遣送回国内，辛苦做出来的业绩也被代理吞掉。发在线消息不回复，接着他连Telegram账号都注销了。你要是想跑，那这辈子都别回国了。三天之内再没有答复，我们几个老乡就直接登门，向你家人问声好。 在拜林“财神”楼一天干18个小时，这是拿命换来的钱，你就这样亏心收下。我们走到今天这个地步，你也清楚原委。公司说你卷钱跑路，我们只能找你家人讨说法。三天不给说法，我们就把你、你家人、公司管理团队以及老板的照片全部曝光到大事件平台上，让全网都看清你们的行径。 我们已经被家里花关系花钱保出来，现在只要求：把用命换来的辛苦钱还给我们。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx166
Showing the 12 most recent of 511 posts we hold for @mdjsj8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“马达加斯加大事件 西港日记 亚太新闻 柬埔寨大事件” (@mdjsj8), 3,473 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mdjsj8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.