Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ТКАНИ | MDC FABRICS

Channel

ТКАНИ | MDC FABRICS

@mdc_fabrics

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

328subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001752033505
TypeChannel
Username@mdc_fabrics
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mdc_fabrics

Growth

321328324.58 August 2026 — 321 subscribers9 August 2026 — 322 subscribers16 August 2026 — 325 subscribers25 August 2026 — 328 subscribers8 August 202625 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 320–329 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 00:36328+3
16 Aug 2026, 18:06325+3
9 Aug 2026, 03:52322+1
8 Aug 2026, 16:01321first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.01%
avg views ÷ 328 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.1
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held7 (5 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total92
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
763.6%
❤‍🔥218.2%
🔥218.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC6 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Когда сама ткань уже задаёт характер будущему изделию. Трикотаж букле привлекает прежде всего фактурой: объёмное переплетение, выразительная клетка и полоска, сложные сочетания оттенков. Даже в лаконичном крое такой материал будет смотреться интересно. При этом трикотаж мягкий и пластичный — подойдёт для кардиганов, жакетов, костюмов и других комфортных изделий, где хочется совместить выразительную фактуру и удобст

8 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC9 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Трикотаж, который привлекает внимание прежде всего своей фактурой. Букле выглядит выразительно даже в самом простом крое: объемная поверхность ткани сама становится акцентом и делает изделие интереснее. Мягкий и комфортный трикотаж подойдет для кардиганов, жакетов, юбок и комплектов. Состав: 90% полиэстер, 10% хлопок Плотность: 310 г/м² А что бы вы сшили из такого букле?

1

7 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC11 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Комфорт и элегантность — именно то сочетание, которое делает образ по-настоящему универсальным. И правильно подобранный трикотаж легко помогает этого добиться. В этом комплекте мы объединили две разные фактуры: ▫️ Трикотаж букле — для выразительного кардигана. ▫️ Джерси с микроначесом — для мягких, комфортных брюк. Вместе они создают гармоничный образ, в котором фактура становится акцентом, а комфорт остается на п

2

7 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC16 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Если при слове «трикотаж» вы представляете только спортивный костюм — посмотрите это видео до конца. В этом видео — два совершенно разных трикотажа, которые доказывают: трикотаж может быть не только комфортным, но и по-настоящему элегантным. ✔️ Джерси с микрофлисом — плотность 400 г/м². Мягкий, теплый, хорошо держит форму и не пиллингуется. ✔️ Трикотаж букле — с выразительной твидовой фактурой. Приятный на ощупь,

2

6 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

5 тканей — 5 изделий🤍 Один фасон может выглядеть совершенно по-разному — всё зависит от материала🪡 Именно поэтому мы решили показать не только ткани, но и то, как они выглядят готовом изделии. ▫️ Рубашечная с бамбуком — мягкая, лёгкая и комфортная. ▫️ Жаккардовый твид — фактура, которая делает образ дороже. ▫️ Лён с жатой фактурой — для воздушных силуэтов. ▫️ Вельвет на трикотажной основе — уютный, пластичный и выр

1

6 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC15 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🎯 Проверим, насколько хорошо вы разбираетесь в тканях? Сможете угадать, из какой ткани сшито каждое изделие до того, как увидите ответ? Всего 5 изделий и 5 разных тканей. Внимательно смотрите видео и пишите свои ответы в комментария👇 Первый, кто правильно угадает все ткани, получит дополнительную скидку 5% на покупку тканей на нашем сайте🛍️ Поехали! 🤍

🔥21

5 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC19 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

При выборе подкладки важно учитывать не только цвет, но и назначение ткани. Саржа ценится за прочность и износостойкость, жаккард — за декоративную изнанку, а карманная ткань для деталей, которые ежедневно испытывают нагрузку. Собрали в карусели небольшую шпаргалку, которая поможет быстрее разобраться в различиях. Сохраняйте, чтобы она была под рукой во время выбора тканей. В MDC Fabrics представлено более 500 по

❤‍🔥2

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @mdc_fabrics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 591,335 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТКАНИ | MDC FABRICS” (@mdc_fabrics), 328 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mdc_fabrics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.