Channel
@mcap_singapore
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,253subscribers
-83 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001394650462 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mcap_singapore |
| Description | We invest where the next paradigm begins. https://linktr.ee/MechanismCapital 🌐 @mechcapital 🇻🇳 @mcap_hanoi 🇯🇵 @mcap_tokyo 🇦🇪 @mcap_dubai Proudly backed 120+ projects. Not investment advice. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mcap_singapore |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 13,253 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 13,260 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 13,270 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 13,277 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 13,279 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 13,290 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 13,292 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 13,308 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 13,318 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 13,325 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 13,334 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 13,336 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (25 May 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,852 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
CLARITY ACT has received a new key deadline — September 15th! 🚨 The US Senate is leaving for the August recess, and Majority Leader John Thune confirmed that after returning, the senators will continue working on the law on the regulation of cryptocurrencies. #USA #News #Crypto
Ripple has unlocked 1 billion XRP as part of its planned August escrow release. At the current exchange rate , the amount of unblocked funds is about $1.08 billion . This program has been in effect since 2017 and is used to predictably manage the XRP supply. At the same time, Ripple traditionally returns most of the unlocked tokens back to escrow, rather than releasing them to the market. After the August unblocki…
A Chart Showing How Money Loses Value #usd #history
🤿️ Back in 2010, Satoshi Nakamoto already understood that quantum computers could become a threat to blockchains. Now, that threat is gradually becoming more than just a theory, and Starknet is preparing in advance. 🛡 The team says the network will become fully quantum-resistant across every layer long before quantum attacks become a real problem. This means Starknet's security is being built not only for today, b…
Moonshot AI introduced Kimi K3, a model with 2.8 trillion parameters and a context of up to 1 million tokens, which beat Claude and GPT in the code writing test. ➠Kimi K3 is distributed for free and with open weights, the model can be downloaded, run on its own servers and modified without paying the developer – a blow to the thesis that advanced AI will remain scarce, expensive and American. The full release is sc…
Michael Burry says the biggest source of demand for U.S. stocks has disappeared. Net equity issuance by U.S. companies has turned positive again for the first time since 2021. Companies are now issuing more new shares than they are buying back. For most of the past 20 years, share buybacks steadily reduced the overall supply of shares in the market, providing a powerful tailwind for stock prices regardless of corp…
The head of the SEC: "The President, in fact, challenged us to turn the United States into the cryptocurrency capital of the world. So that's what we're doing." The SEC has published a regulatory agenda with plans for 2026 with a strong focus on cryptocurrency and tokenization. Main points: ➠For broker-dealers, the SEC is going to review three key rules at once: minimum liquid capital requirements, protection of …
Ethereum founder has unveiled the network’s development roadmap for the coming years - and it’s incredibly ambitious. ⚡Ethereum is preparing for its biggest transformation since The Merge. Key priorities: 🔐 Quantum-safe upgrades to protect against quantum computers 🧠 Integration of recursive STARK proofs ⚡ Significantly faster transaction finality 📈 Scaling the network to entirely new levels 🕵️ Built-in privacy as…
History repeating itself ❔ #Bitcoin #Crypto #Markets
🤔 Since Donald Trump took office as President of the United States on January 20, 2025, here's how a $10,000 investment in each of the largest cryptocurrencies would have performed. If you had invested $10,000 in each asset that day, here's what you'd have today: 🔸 BTC - $6,126 (-38.7%) 🔸 ETH - $5,380 (-46.2%) 🔸 XRP - $4,267 (-57.3%) 🔸 SOL - $2,560 (-74.4%) 🔸 DOGE - $2,131 (-78.7%) 🔸 AVAX - $1,800 (-82.0%) 🔸 ADA - …
💎 Looks like Pavel Durov made his move just in time... He literally erased the chart of TON's former glory. 🧹 Are we really about to see $GRAM at $0.10? #TON #GRAM #Telegram
⚒ Binance has removed the Proof of Work (PoW) tag from all coins that are mined using hardware The move has already sparked discussions across the crypto community, especially among supporters of traditional mining-based cryptocurrencies. #Binance #Crypto #PoW
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @mcap_singapore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 409,152 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇸🇬 Mechanism Capital” (@mcap_singapore), 13,253 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mcap_singapore.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.