Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Михаил Смолин

@mbsmolin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

2,270subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001337041582
TypeChannel
Username@mbsmolin
Created21 January 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mbsmolin

Growth

2,2702,2712,270.56 August 2026 — 2,271 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,271 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,270 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,270–2,271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:432,270-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:342,271no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:172,271first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 2,270 subscribers
Avg views / post
249
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held20 (27 April 202623 July 2026)
Views total498
Reactions total106
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

984 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯52653.5%
👍13914.1%
13713.9%
🙏838.43%
❤‍🔥373.76%
😁323.25%
🔥141.42%
👏30.305%
🕊30.305%
🤝30.305%
😢20.203%
🤓20.203%
🤗20.203%
🤔10.102%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 984reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC273 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @russnasledieFile

Памяти М.Б. Смолина Виталий Даренский Мне написать хотелось плач… Строка эпиграфа взята из моего стихотворения, поэтому она не подписана. Стих этот был написан в марте 2017 года во Владивостоке в кафе на Окатовой. Там из окна открывался такой вид на пролив Босфор Восточный и на остров Русский, на котором я там жил, что можно было бы залюбоваться, однако вместо этого вдруг заболело сердце от тоски смертной. Вот так

26🙏20👍2🔥2🤗1😁1

23 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC225 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @arkadymalerPhoto

Сегодня – первая годовщина смерти Михаила Борисовича Смолина (22.02.1971 - 23.07.2025): историка, издателя и просветителя, внесшего огромный вклад в возрождение и распространение русской консервативной и имперской мысли. Я впервые обратил внимание на просветительскую деятельность Михаила Борисовича в середине нулевых годов, как на редактора-составителя и издателя «Энциклопедии имперской традиции русской мысли» (2005

🙏3710🕊3👍1🔥1🤗1😁1

22 Jun 2026, 10:05 UTC799 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О наследственной монархии как гаранте стабильности Наследственный монарх гораздо чаще является ближе нации, чем временный и недавний её правитель. Наследственный государь не добивался своей власти, а получил её от своих предков по праву рождения наследником престола, что не затрагивает никакого чужого самолюбия... Вообще династичность является лучшим средством поддержания и сохранения монархической идеи как в монарх

👍26❤‍🔥14🙏83😁1

20 Jun 2026, 10:01 UTC979 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О беззащитности личности без сильного государства Если государство не способно защитить свою территориальную целостность и политическую самостоятельность, то такое государство не может считаться ни устойчивым, ни суверенным. Оно не может защитить ни самих граждан, ни их свободу. Если не обеспечена безопасность общества, государства, нет безопасности и у каждого в отдельности её члена, гражданина М.Б. Смолин Монархи

💯38👍63😁1

18 Jun 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,880 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хороший семьянин, как правило, становится и хорошим гражданином, т. е. способным воспринимать и свою Родину, и всех сограждан как свою расширенную гражданскую семью. Таким образом, крепость общественная и государственная напрямую зависит от правильно поставленных семейных отношений в стране М.Б. Смолин Монархический русский консерватизм

30💯25👍4🤓2😁2😢1

26 May 2026, 10:02 UTC≈1,160 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кто виноват в Гражданской войне Большевики полностью виновны в замышлении, проповеди и развязывании Гражданской войны в России как начала русского стратоцида, массового уничтожения людей по классовому принципу, проводимого им несколько десятилетий на русской почве. Потеря любви к родственно, кровно ближнему в начале XX столетия, приведшая к революции, приходу большевиков к власти, Гражданской и последующим классовым

💯57👍95😁1😢1🙏1

24 May 2026, 10:03 UTC879 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О «монархическом костыле» президентства К сожалению, "монархический костыль", каковым является институт президентства, для республики не может заменить настоящего государственного здоровья. Президент слишком ограничен в своих действиях и бюрократией, и финансовыми, и политиканскими группами. По-настоящему творческой свободой может обладать только неограниченный самодержавный Государь М.Б. Смолин Монархический русск

💯37👍105😁2

22 May 2026, 10:05 UTC850 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кто виноват в Гражданской войне Большевики полностью виновны в замышлении, проповеди и развязывании Гражданской войны в России как начала русского стратоцида, массового уничтожения людей по классовому принципу, проводимого им несколько десятилетий на русской почве. Потеря любви к родственно, кровно ближнему в начале XX столетия, приведшая к революции, приходу большевиков к власти, Гражданской и последующим классовым

💯2415🔥4👍3😁2

20 May 2026, 10:03 UTC970 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О демократии и безличности Демократия, в которой мы живём, очень любит всякий внечеловеческий прогресс: цифровизацию, компьютеризацию, телекоммуникацию и т.д. Единственное, с чем ни демократия, ни республика не знают, что делать — это с самим человеком и порождаемыми им семьями, социальными слоями, национальностями, убеждениями, мировоззрениями, идеологиями, верованиями М.Б. Смолин Монархический русский консерватиз

💯276🔥2🤔1😁1

18 May 2026, 10:02 UTC≈1,930 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О Ленине как проповеднике Гражданской войны За десять(!) лет до начала реального гражданского противостояния Ленин в своей статье «Уроки Коммуны» писал, что «социал-демократия упорной и планомерной работой воспитала массы до высших форм борьбы — массовых выступлений и гражданской вооруженной войны. Она сумела разбить в молодом пролетариате «общенациональные» и «патриотические» заблуждения… русский пролетариат должен

💯36🙏72👏1😁1

16 May 2026, 10:00 UTC≈3,380 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026

За прирождённый народный "царизм", за патерналистский взгляд на государство нас будут бесконечно склонять, пока мы не поймём, что такая критика носит чисто русофобский характер. В нас критикуется то, что мы не только не должны, но и не можем исправить. Нельзя поменять национальную психологическую сущность, можно только поломать её. М.Б. Смолин Монархический русский консерватизм

💯35👍6🙏5🤝3😁1

14 May 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,450 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О бюрократии и «дешёвом государстве» марксистов Заменить чиновников народными «надсмотрщиками и бухгалтерами», как мечталось марксистам, не вышло, да и платить партийной и советской номенклатуре «заработную плату рабочего» также не получилось. Аппетиты партийцев были значительно выше «рабочей зарплаты». Наивные мечтания Ленина превратились в снежный ком бюрократического аппарата, дублирующего управленческие функции

💯26👍85😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mbsmolin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 794,234 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Смолин, Михаил Борисович (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…июля 2025 года от онкологического заболевания{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/mbsmolin/9641|title=Михаил Смолин|website=Telegram|access-date=2025-07-24}}…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Михаил Смолин” (@mbsmolin), 2,270 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mbsmolin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.