Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +353. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 207,831–208,290 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 23:59
208,237
+55
12 Aug 2026, 01:34
208,182
+59
11 Aug 2026, 02:01
208,123
+77
10 Aug 2026, 01:51
208,046
+28
9 Aug 2026, 00:54
208,018
+69
8 Aug 2026, 03:52
207,949
+65
7 Aug 2026, 13:46
207,884
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 13 April 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2,430 reactions across 7 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
656
27.0%
❤
575
23.7%
👍
411
16.9%
❤🔥
111
4.57%
💩
95
3.91%
🎉
67
2.76%
🤗
61
2.51%
🍾
56
2.30%
💯
46
1.89%
🤝
44
1.81%
😭
39
1.60%
🍌
30
1.23%
🥰
29
1.19%
👾
24
0.988%
😈
23
0.947%
☃
22
0.905%
🏆
21
0.864%
👨💻
19
0.782%
💊
15
0.617%
🤩
14
0.576%
11 further kinds
72
2.96%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,430reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2023 to 11 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
102
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 7 we hold a reading for · 71%
Most on one post
84
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mbbpw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 April 2023 to 11 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎉 Встречайте нашего бота с нейросетями!
Мы запустили новый проект, и вот, что он умеет:
💃 ии фотосессия – заменит фотосессию с профессиональным фотографом
🎨 нейро-фотошоп – изменяйте или добавляйте любые детали на фото с помощью текста
📸 создать картинку с нуля – создавайте изображения из текстового описания
📼 создать видео с нуля – создавайте видео из текстового описания
👨🎨 Данный бот подойдёт вам, есл…
🤯 Вот и подходит к концу 2024...
Спасибо, что были с нами весь этот год!
🎉 Мы несказанно рады, что уже более 500,000 пользователей сделали выбор в пользу нашего сервиса. Мы будем работать ещё усерднее, чтобы и дальше улучшать качество предоставляемых услуг :)
Весь год мы старались поддерживать хорошее настроение у вас и ваших друзей. В новом году мы продолжим радовать вас новыми розыгрышами!
🎁 Оставайтесь с нами и…
🎁 Большой розыгрыш от команды проекта!
📆 25 июля бот случайным образом выберет 50 победителей, которые получат бесплатный доступ к боту
🔥 1 место
Подписка* на 60 дней или 10 пранк-звонков
❤️ 2–3 место
Подписка* на 30 дней или 5 пранк-звонков
🧡 4–10 место
Подписка* на 7 дней или 3 пранк-звонка
💛 11–25 место
Подписка* на 24 часа или 2 пранк-звонка
💚 26–50 место
Подписка* на 60 минут или 1 пранк-звонок
* – подписка в…
💰 Как создать бота в нашей сети и начать зарабатывать?
• Создайте нового бота через @BotFather – вы получите токен в формате 12345:ABCDEF.
• Пришлите данный токен нашему боту (из сообщения выше).
• Откроется меню настроек вашего бота, в нём выберите подходящий вариант/дизайн бота.
• Поздравляем! Ваш бот запущен! 🎉
✅ Максимально пассивный доход до 🤩🤩🤩 с пополнений в вашем боте.
✅ Расходы, обслуживание, приём …
👋 Привет! Команда проекта на связи.
Что умеет бот Мирай?
🎉 Звонок-розыгрыш – разыграйте друга заготовленной записью и получите запись разговора с реакцией на пранк!
📞 Анонимный звонок – анонимная конференц-связь между двумя номерами. Ваш номер будет скрыт от получателя.
💌 Анонимное SMS – отправляет анонимное сообщение с вашим текстом указанному абоненту. Если на SMS ответят, бот пришлёт вам ответ.
📡 Статус …
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mbbpw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
17
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
17
vacant every time we have ever looked
@mbbpw named 17 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@anuubis888 named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@artemca3355 named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@ben_crut named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@cs16_imba named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@ded_52222 named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@dronkugatorno named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@ezqbt named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@ferrari192 named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@ksushka_mikrovolnovka named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@lilililiillliilli named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@nisoulz named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@odbokat named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@sexyqw4ck named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@tihrey named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@ultra_wise named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@yeatleaked12 named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@zetmo00 named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МИРАЙ – ПЕРЕХОДНИК” (@mbbpw), 208,237 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mbbpw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.