Channel
@mazkaz_Rahma
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
296subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003268555098 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mazkaz_Rahma |
| Description | 🤍Арабский ближе, чем кажется... ⚡️Уроки арабского языка с носителями ⚡️От первой Алиф до книг учёных ⚡️Комплексный подход Начни говорить по-арабски уже с первого урока! |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mazkaz_Rahma |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 296 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 296 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,569 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Из мудрости и жемчужин имама аш-Шафи'и Сказал имам аш-Шафии: Мы искали оставление грехов, и нашли его в молитве ад-Духа. И мы искали освещение могил, и нашли его в чтении Корана. И мы искали переход через мост Сират, и нашли его в посте и милостыне. И мы искали тень Трона, и нашли её в любви к праведникам. https://t.me/live_dnevnik
ОФИЦИАЛЬНЫЙ СТАРТ НАБОРА: 🖌«Арабский с нуля» в Markaz Rahma Мы завершили подготовку программы курса. Это прямой путь от незнания букв до уверенного чтения по авторитетному мединскому пособию «Аль-Каида аль-Мадания» (автор — имам Мечети Пророка ﷺ, шейх Абдуль-Мухсин аль-Касим). ✔️ Почему эта система дает 100% результат Ин ша Аллах: Лестница сложности: поэтапный шаг — от букв и связок из 2 слов до свободного чтения…
Отличное пособие для тех, кто делает первые шаги в арабском Для тех, кто только учится читать по-арабски, «Аль Каида аль-Мадания» лучшее пособие. 🌟 В ней поэтапно и удобно выстроена система. сначала вы проходите алфавит, основные правила чтения, учитесь соединять буквы в слова. 🔻А после уже приходит чтение нескольких слов. Сначала связки из 2 слов - закладываем базу. Потом связка из 3 слов - укрепляем навык. Да…
⤵️
Чтобы начать, не обязательно быть мастером. Но чтобы стать мастером, нужно начать».
ПОЧЕМУ АЛЬ - КАИДАТУ АЛЬ - МАДАНИЯ? 1. Это официальный учебный материал, по которому занимаются в кружках по изучению Священного Корана в Запретной мечети в Мечети Пророка Аль-Масджид ан-Набави. 2. Книга написана выдающимся ученым, шейхом, доктором абд аль-Мухсином бин Мухаммадом аль-Касимом — имамом и хатыбом Мечети Пророка ﷺ. Работает имамом более 25 лет. 3. Она создана специально для того, чтобы плавно, бережно…
Ас саламу алейкум ва рахматулахи ва баракатух Ждем ваши самые интересные вопросы и предложения по ссылке: http://t.me/voprosy?start=yppdttr
Книга, которая изменит ваш старт в арабском: На днях нам попалось на глаза очень хорошее пособие для изучения чтения на арабском языка с нуля от шейха Абдулмухсина ибн Мухаммада аль-Касима. Эта книга нам сразу понравилась: материал изложен настолько грамотно, просто и структурировано. Без воды, по полочкам. Эта книга — для тех, кто вообще не знает язык и хочет начать учить его с самого нуля. В ней собрана самая…
ИТОГИ НАШЕГО ОПРОСА: Iجزاكم الله خير каждому за участие в опросе. Ваши ответы показали, что вам действительно важно. Больше голосов набрало направление по Истории пророков, а также огромный отклик получил запрос на мини-курс по заучиванию Корана. Мы всё это проанализировали и сейчас думаем над форматом: как лучше реализовать уроки по истории пророков в виде живых эфиров или отдельного закрытого канала и как структ…
В арабском языке есть удивительный момент. Это когда письменная речь и разговорная живут в параллельных вселенных: Фусха (الفصحى) — строгий литературный язык. На нем пишут книги, читают новости и Коран. Аммия (العامية) — живой разговорный диалект. На нем говорят на улице, дома, на рынках. Говорить на чистой Фусхе в обычном магазине — это примерно как заказывать продукты строгими фразами из XIX века: вас, конеч…
Книги для общего развития и словарного запаса
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой уровень или книгу разберем дальше?
The shares total 214%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mazkaz_Rahma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Книги для общего развития и словарного запаса
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой уровень или книгу разберем дальше?
The shares total 214%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 329,206 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MARKAZ RAHMA | الرحمة” (@mazkaz_Rahma), 296 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mazkaz_Rahma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.