Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Максимъ Марусенковъ

Channel

Максимъ Марусенковъ

@maxmarusenkov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

364subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001855007191
TypeChannel
Username@maxmarusenkov
Created8 January 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/maxmarusenkov

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3643663657 August 2026 — 365 subscribers8 August 2026 — 365 subscribers8 August 2026 — 366 subscribers16 August 2026 — 365 subscribers24 August 2026 — 364 subscribers31 August 2026 — 366 subscribers9 September 2026 — 365 subscribers19 September 2026 — 364 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 364–366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:39364-1
9 Sept 2026, 21:16365-1
31 Aug 2026, 04:05366+2
24 Aug 2026, 16:25364-1
16 Aug 2026, 21:03365-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:26366+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:31365no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:56365first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

295 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14348.5%
👍7926.8%
🔥3010.2%
😢196.44%
👎82.71%
😁72.37%
✍51.69%
🤔41.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 May 2026, 14:13 UTC242 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

сладко бо медвеныи сотъ. и добро сахаръ обоѥго же добрѣи книжныи разумъ. (Сборникъ Чудова монастыря, к. ХІѴ в., 287б).

👍7

21 May 2026, 19:50 UTC356 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дѣлате(л) землю мѧгчитъ, а филосо(ѳ) д҃шу. (Пчела, ХІѴ—ХѴ вв., 56). Дѣлатель—земледѣлецъ.

❤5👍3

20 May 2026, 19:55 UTC376 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Гигантскіе администраторы» (c) Хорошее интервью Александра Бутягина.

👍3❤1

20 May 2026, 17:01 UTC304 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Лучшимъ рѣшеніемъ вопроса о Санктъ-Петербургѣ/Петроградѣ, конечно, сталъ бы Санктъ-Петербургъ въ Петроградской губерніи. И Екатеринбургъ въ Екатерининской губерніи по аналогіи.

👍19❤3🔥3

11 May 2026, 10:38 UTC400 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Въ сознаніи, для котораго отрицаніе Бога утрачиваетъ сколько-нибудь серьезное значеніе, атеизмъ уступаетъ мѣсто а-теизму [нонъ-теизму], т. е. религіозному индифферентизму, безрелигіозности. Сознаніе этого типа формируется въ тѣхъ областяхъ дѣятельности, которыя становятся автономными по отношенію къ религіи; напр., наука объясняетъ изучаемыя ею явленія такъ, какъ если бы Бога не было, оставляя вопросъ о Богѣ за пред…

👍4👎4❤2🔥2

10 May 2026, 13:31 UTC340 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Послѣ этого подкаста заинтересовался работами «христіанскаго атеиста» Барта Эрмана (Bart D. Ehrman). У насъ же любятъ ссылаться на вѣрующихъ ученыхъ, особенно естественниковъ, какъ будто фактъ ихъ вѣры способенъ хоть какъ-то ослабить конфликтъ науки и религіи. Здѣсь обратный случай: крупный спеціалистъ по исторіи и текстологіи Новаго Завѣта перешелъ отъ консервативнаго евангельскаго христіанства къ «прогрессивному» (…

👎4👍3🔥1🤔1

10 May 2026, 13:15 UTC273 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

...но какое же оно (злато) все-таки красивое. Въ частности, на обрѣзахъ и переплетахъ старинныхъ книгъ, для покрытія и тисненія которыхъ использовали твореное и сусальное золото, а не фольгу, какъ сейчасъ.

👍9❤3

7 May 2026, 20:23 UTC335 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

злато бо ѥсть несытыхъ д҃шь брашьно (Сб. словъ и поученій к. ХІІ—н. ХІІІ в., 13 об.).

✍1👍1

20 Mar 2026, 19:34 UTC≈1,140 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Александръ Сергѣевичъ заглядывалъ въ Академическій словарь лишь «встарь»*, а я вотъ заглядываю черезъ день-другой. И каждый разъ попадается что-нибудь любопытное, пока долистаешь до искомой статьи. Въ этотъ разъ глазъ зацѣпился за второе значеніе слова «ще́голь (що́голь)»: «Говорится иногда и о такомъ, кто любитъ покупать или держать у себя дорогія или лучшей доброты вещи. Щеголь на вина, на платье, на лошадей». Со…

❤18🔥4👍3

21 Feb 2026, 21:59 UTC545 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Утѣшьтесь, васъ Царь наградитъ». Похвальная грамота «За честную царскую службу. Достойному—достойное». Бумага, хромолитографія, тисненіе. 52×34 см. Хромолитографія Теодоръ Киббель. Художникъ Владиміръ Амосовичъ Табуринъ (1864—1919). (Какая же красота!..).

❤25👍6🔥3

14 Feb 2026, 09:56 UTC856 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Русское правописаніе» Якова Карловича Грота досталось мнѣ въ очаровательной версіи—съ карандашнымъ рисункомъ кота Василія, исполненнымъ однимъ изъ прежнихъ владѣльцевъ въ 1894 году.

❤42🔥6👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @maxmarusenkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Максимъ Марусенковъ” (@maxmarusenkov), 364 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maxmarusenkov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.