/14

Channel
Matrix-Coaching Günter Kerschbaummayr
@matrixcoaching1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,314subscribers
-190 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001218473861 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @matrixcoaching1 |
| Description | Neues Wachstum für eine neue Zeit |
| Created | 28 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/matrixcoaching1 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 12:19 | 12,314 | +1 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 15:50 | 12,313 | -12 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 06:55 | 12,325 | -5 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:28 | 12,330 | -1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 00:08 | 12,331 | +1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:26 | 12,330 | -4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:47 | 12,334 | -8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:47 | 12,342 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:06 | 12,348 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 12,350 | +2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:10 | 12,348 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:48 | 12,350 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 12,351 | +1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 12,350 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:06 | 12,353 | -1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:45 | 12,354 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:11 | 12,359 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 12,363 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:35 | 12,367 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 12,371 | first reading |
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 37.4%
- avg views ÷ 12,314 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,600
- 28 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.09%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 28
- of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 65 (10 July 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 128,851 |
| Reactions total | 2,674 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 21:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,280
- Videos
- ≈217
- Links
- ≈2,220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 42s
- Average length
- 1m 34s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,341 reactions across 64 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5,663 | 77.1% | |
| 🙏 | 626 | 8.53% | |
| 👍 | 538 | 7.33% | |
| 🕊 | 169 | 2.30% | |
| ❤🔥 | 78 | 1.06% | |
| 🥰 | 78 | 1.06% | |
| 🔥 | 77 | 1.05% | |
| 👏 | 47 | 0.64% | |
| 🎉 | 20 | 0.272% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 0.15% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 0.109% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 0.095% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 0.068% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.068% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.041% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.027% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.027% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.014% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.014% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,341 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (42.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Bis zum 13./14. November waren sowohl Merkur als auch Venus rückläufig. Merkur bewegt sich im Skorpion, Venus in der Waage. Tiefe Reflexionen und Gespräche bringen Beziehungen in Balance. Nicht immer sind Menschen bereit für diese Gespräche, vor allem wenn es in die Tiefe oder um blinde Flecken geht. Eine kurze SMS kann eine Beziehung beenden, von der man glaubte, sie sei eine Freundschaft. Und das alles, weil man s…
❤34🙏6
Die Rückkehr zu deiner inneren Weisheit -Wir leben in einer Welt voller Antworten. Doch woher weißt du, welche davon wirklich deine ist? Gerade in einer Zeit, in der sich so vieles verändert, wird es immer wichtiger, wieder Zugang zu jener Weisheit zu finden, die längst in uns liegt. Genau dafür öffnet der SUMMIT OF INNER KNOWING von Clara Fink einen außergewöhnlichen Erfahrungsraum. Das Gespräch mit Clara war bes…
❤16👍1
Habt gute Inspirationen bei diesem Gespräch zum Thema KI. Das Thema ist allgegenwärtig und wird uns noch fordern. Was darf uns bewusster werden. Wie gehen wir damit um? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoCenrqDoy8
❤23🙏7👍6
Das Jahresende naht – nicht nur das! Warum unser Bewusstsein jetzt entscheidend ist. Es braucht dazu neue Energie, und erst dann erschaffen wir eine neue Realität. Natürlich ist das Bewusstsein der erste Schritt, denn dort beginnt der Wandel. Was ist wichtig für dieses Jahr? Was endet, und was will beginnen? Ich gehe hier bewusst nicht zu tief auf astrologische Details ein. Pluto im Wassermann und Uranus im Zeiche…
❤90🙏16👍8❤🔥3👏2
Heute ist ab 17 Uhr mein Beitrag gratis und online verfügbar :-) Das Gespräch mit Kai ist immer wieder erhellend und vielleicht auch für dich ;-) Enjoy! Melde dich gerne gratis an ;-) https://www.digistore24.com/content/719948/55759/Remar007/CAMPAIGNKEY
❤31👏3🙏1
Neumond im Skorpion – ein enormes Schattenspiel: Diese Skorpionzeit ist tatsächlich bemerkenswert anspruchsvoll. Viele Trigger werden unbewusst ausgelöst, und ebenso unbewusst sind die Reaktionen vieler Menschen. Die Wochen davor hatte ich das Thema Beziehungen im Fokus und die Frage, wie wir Gespräche führen, um unterschwellige Energien zu bereinigen. Es ist erstaunlich, in welchen Kreisen das noch immer in einer F…
❤74👍16🙏14❤🔥5🥰4
Auf diesem Kanal taucht immer wieder dieses Bild oder ein Bot auf, er ist nicht erwünscht durch seine fragwürdigen Kommentare und Einladungen! Ich habe ihn längst gesperrt, taucht jedoch immer wieder auf! Meldet das bitte!!!! Danke
👍26🙏12❤3🕊1
Bis am 11.11. ist der Genschlüssel 1 aktiv: Entropie hat mit der Dumpfheit in dieser Welt zu tun, die auf Spaltung und Lieblosigkeit zurückzuführen ist. Das Gefühl von Sinnlosigkeit hält uns im Schattenzustand gefangen. Wo fühlst du dich entwurzelt oder sogar verbannt? Dieses Gefühl führt uns oft in eine Erschöpfung und kann nur erlöst werden, wenn wir uns daran erinnern, was unsere Lebendigkeit ausmacht. Es brauc…
❤84👍6
Wahrnehmung ist das zentrale Themen in dieser Zeit. https://youtube.com/shorts/SQcWYbixzVw?feature=share Ich freue mich auf den kommenden 👉 Live-Online Abend am 9.11. 😉
❤39👍8🙏4
Beobachte dein Leben bis 1.4. 2027! Eine Zeit für wichtige Erkenntnisse, die dir das Leben zeigen wird!! Eine astrologisch seltene Betrachtung - aber von höchster Relevanz: Mars tritt in seine Schattenphase ein. Dies ist relevant bis Mitte 2027 Mit dem Eintritt von Mars in seine Schattenphase beginnt eine Zeit, in der wir genauer hinschauen dürfen: Was treibt uns wirklich an? Wo handeln wir bewusst und wo reagier…
❤111❤🔥5👏4🥰2🐳1
Der aktuelle Gene Key 44 betont die Besonderheit, die in unseren Genen liegt: Vieles an emotionalen Störungen, die wir derzeit erleben, ist transgenerational, liegt also in früheren Generationen abgespeichert. Es liegt in unserer DNA. Diese starke Skorpionenergie, in der der rückläufige Merkur nun auf die Sonne trifft und in 10 Tagen wieder direktläufig wird, lädt uns dazu ein, uns zu erinnern: Welche Muster erle…
❤114🕊7❤🔥5🙏4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @matrixcoaching1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@matrixcoaching1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 November 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@silkeschaefer · 120,142
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
@sunevonews · 40,250
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
@theki_offiziell · 21,231
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
@mediumbirgitfischer · 80,938
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@christinavondreien · 26,811
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
@younity_mee · 60,640
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
@pavlinaklemmlichtbotschaften · 26,730
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Matrix-Coaching Günter Kerschbaummayr” (@matrixcoaching1), 12,314 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matrixcoaching1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.