Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MATICCC666

@matic666

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,568subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001476429444
TypeChannel
Username@matic666
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/matic666

Growth

3,5683,5743,5717 August 2026 — 3,574 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,572 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,568 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,567–3,575 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:533,568-4
8 Aug 2026, 03:143,572-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:323,574first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,083 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,25060.0%
custom 530107250759855048932315.5%
2079.94%
💔1889.03%
custom 5224708023435404637703.36%
💩452.16%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,083reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2025 to 16 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Mar 2026, 10:48 UTC≈3,080 views286 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если телеграмм действительно заблокируют и много, кто не сможет пользоваться им. Хочу заранее поблагодарить вас за участие в жизни нашего уютного канала и чата! Я создал его в 2021 году, 5 лет назад, когда у меня не было ничего и мне было очень плохо в те времена. Сейчас нас тут 3900 человек, каждому благодарен и каждого рад видеть в реальности. Знаю, что ребята из нашего чата знакомились, объединялись, общались, ссо

💔16710711💩1

8 Mar 2026, 15:51 UTC≈4,300 views80 reactionsread 7 August 2026

с др или че там у вас хуй знает

57💩1210💔1

5 Feb 2026, 14:45 UTC≈5,290 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @softestbed

Попадаются видео с этим островом Эпштейна. Да они там похоже все пидарасы

custom 53010725075985504893810💩2

9 Jan 2026, 20:45 UTC≈7,030 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

помогите усатому с усатым..

39custom 5301072507598550489145

7 Jan 2026, 18:50 UTC≈5,320 views93 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

меняю дисциплину и т.д

61💔178custom 53010725075985504897

31 Dec 2025, 21:38 UTC≈5,340 views123 reactionsread 7 August 2026

с новым годом подпищики!🎄

8727custom 53010725075985504899

31 Dec 2025, 13:07 UTC≈5,170 views218 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ребят, я хочу пожелать вам счастливого наступающего нового года. Сейчас много скопированных поздравлений, которые люди просто отправляют своим знакомым, даже не читая их. Это печально. Я бы хотел написать о том, чего я сильно желаю и что лежит глубоко в сердце. Наши друзья, самые близкие и самые удаленные, очень важны для нас, и эту дружбу нельзя выразить простым сообщением, скопированным у другого человека. Хочу ска

15637custom 530107250759855048921💩4

6 Nov 2025, 14:57 UTC≈7,730 views171 reactionsread 7 August 2026

всем гучи я долбаеб ебучий

107custom 53010725075985504893820💩4💔2

14 Aug 2025, 21:11 UTC≈11,400 views66 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

3 фламинго занос

56custom 53010725075985504898💩2

8 Aug 2025, 10:58 UTC≈11,200 views77 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

теперь точно

599custom 53010725075985504899

8 Aug 2025, 10:52 UTC≈8,440 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026

мой запас контента исчерпан.

49custom 530107250759855048995

9 Jun 2025, 14:06 UTC≈8,840 views119 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

свага-присутствует картель-опладирует стоя дрилл-авиация дрипчик-снг не выкупит время-не детское оппы-уничтожены

79custom 530107250759855048924custom 522470802343540463715💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @matic666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 771,290 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MATICCC666” (@matic666), 3,568 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matic666.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.