3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,886–1,894 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 19:18
1,893
+5
7 Aug 2026, 13:11
1,888
+1
6 Aug 2026, 14:06
1,887
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
42.4%
avg views ÷ 1,893 subscribers
Avg views / post
803
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held
20 (22 February 2025 – 26 July 2026)
Views total
1,606
Reactions total
52
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
587 reactions across 20 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
227
38.7%
🔥
154
26.2%
🍓
75
12.8%
👍
29
4.94%
😭
20
3.41%
🥰
15
2.56%
🤔
10
1.70%
⚡
6
1.02%
🎄
6
1.02%
👀
6
1.02%
😇
6
1.02%
🤝
4
0.681%
❤🔥
3
0.511%
🆒
3
0.511%
🌚
2
0.341%
🐳
2
0.341%
👏
2
0.341%
👨💻
2
0.341%
👾
2
0.341%
💔
2
0.341%
6 further kinds
11
1.87%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 587reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
374
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 20 we hold a reading for · 65%
Most on one post
104
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @materialgram. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 February 2025 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
v7.0.5.1
Official changelog:
- Rich Text Editor.
- Telegram Communities.
- Invisible Bot Messages.
- Rich Text Formatting for Bots.
- Guardian Bots for Group Chats.
- Links in Poll Options.
- Viewer for Markdown files in .md format.
- Instant View that's really instant.
- Get answers from AI bots in any chat by tagging their @username.
- Connect a bot to your profile with the new Chat Automation.
- Custom AI styles i…
v6.7.7.1
- Better platform detection for photos and profile photos
- Show mutual contacts in contacts box
- Material Design 3 button ripple effect
- Hide AI composer, replace message translate button with it
Official changelog:
- AI Text Editor for messages.
- Enhanced Polls with media, locations and suggested options.
- Bots can create and managed other Bots on your behalf.
- Drawing tools in image editor (brush, ma…
v6.4.0.1
- Enhance platform detection for photos
Official changelog:
- AI Summaries for posts in channels.
- Show who sent your unique collectible gifts.
- Offer stars or TON for unique gifts.
- Support passkey login on Windows.
- Export separate topics message history.
- Export audio files saved to profile.
- Reorder stories in stories albums in My Profile.
- Add your Saved Music to data export.
- Reorder saved musi…
v6.2.3.1
Official changelog:
- Fix crash when viewing messages with hidden senders.
- Fix possible crash when editing contacts.
- Fix layout of character count warning in contact notes.
- Fix icons when editing contacts.
- Fix color of sending messages animation in complex themes.
- Fix crash in chat open on Flatpak build.
v6.2.2.1
Official changelog:
- Comments and reactions in group calls.
- Notes for contacts.
- Suggested birthdays.
- Threads for AI bots.
- Reorder gifts collections and stories albums.
- Reorder gifts inside collections.
- Apply tags instantly when forwarding to Saved Messages.
- Choose which screen to show notifications on.
- Nice text message sending animation.
i don't know why they didn't mention in the changelog that this update adds gift collections in profiles and support for purchasing new (not yet released) gifts
group calls have also been fixed
v5.16.4.1
- Show more info for unique gifts
- 256 bitrate in voice messages
- Hide phone number for non-contacts in top bar
Official changelog:
- Allow removing / charging fee in channel direct messages.
- Don't offer creating checklists in channels.
- Support author channel in gifts.
v5.16.1.1
Official changelog:
- Fix inline keyboard updating in bot messages.
- Fix possible crash in fast chat switching.
- Different minor fixes.
❤8👍3👾2🔥2🤔2
Signed ahtoh
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @materialgram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 494,328 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“materialgram” (@materialgram), 1,893 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/materialgram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
